- Joined
- Nov 6, 2019
- Messages
- 11,731
- Reaction score
- 5,174
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Congratulations on your self-sufficiency. Not serious here, but if you were to tell me what you do for a living or where you live, I bet I could point out what the government does that benefits you. Live in a flood plain -- FEMA; farmer with a lot of land -- dams and subsidized water, Ag schools that develop new techniques and pesticides, labor with fewer benefits, other farm subsidies; contract with the government -- Trump's rule that your safety record doesn't matter (hopefully will end under Biden); head of a business -- the right to incorporate to shield you from some liability; employer in many conservative states -- right to work laws.
I am not saying any of the above are bad things, (except right to work laws) but neither are benefits given to poorer people.
So, why do you compare infrastructure and other policies designed to encourage expanding an economy, to mailing out checks to people sitting at home watching Oprah and Family Fued? Farming creates jobs, food supply chain, and a TAX BASE which further aids in paying for government services. Who benefits from mailing out EBT cards than the person going to buy junk food because they are too lazy or stupid to cook their own food? Maybe that helps fast food places; do we really need more of those?
Think of the government as a big sow, with each of us sucking at a teat. There is a natural tendency to assume that we get nothing, unlike the other lazy so-and-so.
Government is a big sow, and that is why we need less of it. Better for people to stand on their own two feet. "Give a man a fish, feed him for a day. "Teach a man to fish, feed him for the rest of his life"---as the saying goes.
As to the stigma of welfare, years ago I worked for the United Farmworkers Union. The growers whose union contracts I administered nice guys with one exception,felt that it was them alone against the land, the weather, and acts of God. But they had subsidized labor under different rules than other workers for two decades after the "temporary" wartime bracero program, subsidized water, soil analysis and pesticide development from Ag colleges available to them, and they spoke as if unaware of all that. At one meeting of union staff, Cesar Chavez mused that "we don't need all these welfare programs, just the right to organize."
I don't like subsidize either, but most of those were hold overs from a time when they figured agriculture was of strategic national interest. But again, a big difference I think it supporting an economy than an individual. Individuals aren't economies, they only drain society of resources. But I'm not totally hard hearted. I just don't agree with mailing out checks where people are not subject to any conditions on that money. With farm subsidize there were at least some conditions to be met where their not? But give most welfare people a check, and they can spend it on junk food and lottery tickets. If people are hungry, then have them go to food banks and get sack of rice and flour, not give them a means to make more poor decisions.
If that farmer doesn't use a subsidy correctly he goes out of business.
And don't get me started on unions. This isn't 1890 coal mining country. Unions are not much different than criminal protection rackets i.e., the mafia.
Problem with parts of conservative ideology is that it opposes welfare benefits on the one hand, and on the other, opposes rules that allow workers to freely organize and contract with employers.
People are free to organize, but who benefits the most from that other than the rich union bosses who know how to butter their own pockets well. I always negotiated my own salary in every job. Why settle for chicken feed union scale when you can shoot for the stars? And for unskilled workers, they are just basically attempting to extort pay far beyond what the market would dictate for uneducated unskilled people. Fruit pickers aren't aerospace engineers, they are a dime a dozen. All union farm labor does is force farmers to find cheaper labor, usually illegal labor.