- Joined
- Sep 29, 2007
- Messages
- 29,262
- Reaction score
- 10,126
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
So are you saying that MSM is more like Mahr, than like Hannity? Thanks for admitting the bias.
j-mac
Not at all what I said.
Then by all means please clarify.
j-mac
OP_link said:About 293,000 Democrats are registered in Delaware, compared with about 183,000 Republicans.
Mahr is a buffoon.
Wow, after seeing that video, she makes Sarah Palin look like a genius.
And the savaging begins. Seems like a decent person. She has strong conservative views but she is not an idiot.
Am guessing the media and the left will be making this the showcase contest in the mid-terms and O'Donnell will be this year's pinata. (not unlike Palin was a couple of years ago)
But in all fairness, Rove got things started with his remarks last night. Not sure what that dumb **** was thinking.....:roll:
.
"strong conservative views"..... I see, so you are saying that the conservative movement would turn over Jews to Nazi's.... I see. How about her views on masturbation, is that conservative views too?
From I gathered out of that round table she would leave it up to god.
But you were saying that it was hypoctritical of people who complain about choosing the "lesser of two evils" to bemoan this result, when the opposite is true.
The results are making voters statewide choose between two candidates they don't view favorably, preventing them from having a choice of a person who they view favorably.
It is the state GOP's feelings on this that are irrelevant, since from the point of view of those bemoaning the choice of the "lesser of two evils", this applies to the electorate as a whole.
Once again, if the lesser of two evils is the one who disagrees with you less, this is going to be the choice you will have in every election where you are not personally on the ballot.
Thanks to O'Donnell primary voters, statewide voters will now have to choose between two candidates they see as less non-evil than Castle, and they will probably end up choosing the one the O'Donnell primary voters see as being the greatest evil. It's essentially a lose-lose situation.
Stop defending her gezzz, you are embarrassing yourself.
What she said is indefensible and you know it.. If it had been a left wing candidate you would have been all over it..
Good God, come on, you guy's aren't this obtuse are you? I know you aren't saying it, I am asking it....So how about you answer it?
j-mac
Oh BTW, ABC is reporting:
So I guess it's on.
j-mac
So she would what.. stand there silent till god did something? You mean like god did not stop the holocaust? So is she saying that because God did not stop the holocaust, then it was God's will to exterminate the Jews, gays, mentally handicapped, communists/socialists and gypsies?
Is that a real strong conservative view?.
And you'd defend it while throwing in attacks against Israel? Are you done godwining the thread now with worthless additions?
If it had been a left wing candidate you would have been all over it..
You made an accusation to another member that they would be acting differently if a liberal had said what its been suggested this candidate said. I was making a similar accusation to you that if it was a liberal that had said it rather than running through here godwining the thread you'd instead be supporting them and throwing out your own attacks on Israel in the process. I'm not changing talking about the exact same hypothetical you stated here:
Doing the same thing you did there, stating what you think a poster would've been doing had it happened on the other side.
As to her statements, what she meant by them, and her stance on Jews, I'll make my own personal call on it for myself when I get home and can research it in a far more independent and full portion then the disingenuous words of someone who routinely, ruthlessly, and continually attacks and pushes propoganda about Israel around now suddenly acting like such things offends his sensabilities.
a few things are clear:
gop turnout in delaware was double what was expected in this closed primary
the more the establishment rips on TEA the better it tastes to american voters
ms odonnell is HOT, she's getting flooded with donations, just since last nite---her website crashed today
this race is gonna be close, if she loses it won't be by much
and that in itself is terrifying to the party in power, that a tea party extremist has a real chance to take joe biden's bench in the blue hens
something is happening in america, something big
we are witnessing the awakening of an exciting NEW gop
it is likely to pilfer pelosi's place, and it's going to come very close upstairs, at the least
worry
Nice spin. The reality is that the Tea Party pretty much ensured the Democrats will keep the Senate. For that I owe them a measure of thanks. Thank you Palin and Tea Party....
The tea party's success has made it more likely that voters in Delaware will have a Senator from the democratic party, and have just diminished the Republican Party's chances of taking over the senate.
2 Insurgents Could Hurt G.O.P. Chances for Senate Takeover - NYTimes.com
People have to vote their conscience, but they've not only impacted Delaware, they've also impacted the rest of the U.S.
I find it humorous, personally. Of course, I'll be voting for Charlie Crist, Independent, for Senator. I wonder whether he will reaffiliate with the republican party when he gets elected, or if he'll become a democrat.
According to Nate Silver, this means that the Reps have a 21% chance of taking the Senate instead of the 26% chance they had yesterday. Not sure what you're basing your argument on, but the numbers disagree.
Nice spin. The reality is that the Tea Party pretty much ensured the Democrats will keep the Senate. For that I owe them a measure of thanks. Thank you Palin and Tea Party....
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?