• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Democratic Sen. Alex Padilla is forcefully removed from Noem’s news conference and handcuffed

And with Noem there to say they are there to overthrow the government, questions should arise.

I asked before for evidence, in her words, of this claim.


.
 
Perhaps your opinion doesn't matter.

If all you got is a criticism of my writing you're posts are not worth my time \

Good bye.

Get your attention fix somewhere else
Huh? I am maybe disagreeing with what happens in the fall because taco tends to taco.
So he hurts things but not badly enough so we limp along or something.

Its the future. I dont predict things. Nor do I care about fragile egos.
 
He simply wanted a confrontation. He got it.
He wanted answers, which he had previously asked the Administration but had not received.

Manhandling him, tackling him to the ground, and handcuffing him was not appropriate. And it sure as hell shouldn't be acceptable, even to MAGA.
 
So he can barge in and interrupt her... that is common decency and fine... but she is the unprofessional rude one by continuing with her speech while he is fighting police? Double Standard Partisan "logic", anybody?
Her security detail. That she didn't stop the men from manhandling the Senator, tackling him to the ground and handcuffing him is on her.
 
He wanted answers, which he had previously asked the Administration but had not received.

Manhandling him, tackling him to the ground, and handcuffing him was not appropriate. And it sure as hell shouldn't be acceptable, even to MAGA.
MAGA had nothing to do with it.

This is all so repetitious. The guy wanted an answer to a question. The guy felt entitled to disrupt a press conference to ask his question. And yet, at his own press conference afterwards he refused to take questions. The guy is no king. He's just a hypocritical senator who provoked a spectacle.
 
He wanted answers, which he had previously asked the Administration but had not received.

Manhandling him, tackling him to the ground, and handcuffing him was not appropriate. And it sure as hell shouldn't be acceptable, even to MAGA.
MAGA had nothing to do with it.

This is all so repetitious. The guy wanted an answer to a question. The guy felt entitled to disrupt a press conference to ask his question. And yet, at his own press conference afterwards he refused to take questions. The guy is no king. He's just a hypocritical senator who provoked a spectacle.
1,032

Where did I state that MAGA had anything to do with noem's allowing her security detail to manhandle, tackle to the ground, and handcuff a US Senator from California who asked a question during her presser?
 
Her security detail. That she didn't stop the men from manhandling the Senator, tackling him to the ground and handcuffing him is on her.

She was speaking. She had lights in her face. Ever given a speech?

A bunch of guys in the audience are kinda shoving each other. You think she could tell exactly what was happening? Even if she did, so what? She was speaking. HE is responsible for physically resisting. HE could have, he should have, just waited. But you want to blame a calm speaker and condone a disruptive person in the audience.

This is actually a head scratcher... the absolute refusal to just admit that he got it wrong.

If a child is speaking and another kid interrupts them in class, the teacher stops the disruptive kid. This seems like a no brainer... every parent understand this... but not you and not a few others... you want the bully to be able to bully and if he can't, you are upset about it? ****ing Weird.

.
 
He wanted answers, which he had previously asked the Administration but had not received.

I want answers!! RIGHT NOW!!


ANSWER MY QUESTION. Stop eating... ANSWER ME!!!

Seem reasonable?

 
1,032

Where did I state that MAGA had anything to do with noem's allowing her security detail to manhandle, tackle to the ground, and handcuff a US Senator from California who asked a question during her presser?
This is what I questioned:

"And it sure as hell shouldn't be acceptable, even to MAGA."

So tell me how that relates to the incident.
 
She was speaking. She had lights in her face. Ever given a speech?

A bunch of guys in the audience are kinda shoving each other. You think she could tell exactly what was happening? Even if she did, so what? She was speaking. HE is responsible for physically resisting. HE could have, he should have, just waited. But you want to blame a calm speaker and condone a disruptive person in the audience.

This is actually a head scratcher... the absolute refusal to just admit that he got it wrong.

If a child is speaking and another kid interrupts them in class, the teacher stops the disruptive kid. This seems like a no brainer... every parent understand this... but not you and not a few others... you want the bully to be able to bully and if he can't, you are upset about it? ****ing Weird.

.
Her security detail. She likely heard the question. She likely heard the 3-4 guys' attacking the Senator as they tackled him to the floor and handcuffed him. She likely heard him announce who he is.

And she has eyes, which means she likely saw everything.

She was in charge. Her guys. Her responsibility.
 
The guy wanted an answer to a question. The guy felt entitled to disrupt a press conference to ask his question.
This is America.

As an American he is indeed entitled to disrupt a press conference to ask a question of a government rep.

When did you lose your patriotism?
 
This is America.

As an American he is indeed entitled to disrupt a press conference to ask a question of a government rep.

When did you lose your patriotism?
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
 
He wanted answers, which he had previously asked the Administration but had not received.

Manhandling him, tackling him to the ground, and handcuffing him was not appropriate. And it sure as hell shouldn't be acceptable, even to MAGA.
I want answers!! RIGHT NOW!!


ANSWER MY QUESTION
. Stop eating... ANSWER ME!!!

Seem reasonable?
Post #1,035


He had previously asked for answers re the Administration's sending armed troops to LA. He had received none.

If you don't believe that the Administration should provide requested information re sending armed troops - without the governor's request for the military - there's nothing I can say to convince you otherwise.
 
This is America.

As an American he is indeed entitled to disrupt a press conference to ask a question of a government rep.

When did you lose your patriotism?
This was not a public event where civil disobedience was tolerated. Even at a public event disruptors frequently get the boot out of there. My patriotism? Geez, that was a sophomoric burn.
 
This was not a public event where civil disobedience was tolerated. Even at a public event disruptors frequently get the boot out of there. My patriotism? Geez, that was a sophomoric burn.
1,041

?????

What "civil disobedience"? There was none on the part of the Senator from California who was seeking to gather information at the presser - where people ask questions.
 
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
And so Padilla sought to deny Noem her freedom of speech by disrupting her speech? Ok. I buy that.
 
And so Padilla sought to deny Noem her freedom of speech by disrupting her speech? Ok. I buy that.
Noem was acting as a government agent. People can question her. It isn't illegal to interrupt her asking a question, especially as you are being manhandled and dragged away for daring approach to ask a question.
 
And so Padilla sought to deny Noem her freedom of speech by disrupting her speech? Ok. I buy that.
Post #1,043


Nah. Those giving pressers are interrupted. These interruptions are not "denying free speech rights".

(See this on zerohedge or fox?)
 
1,041

?????

What "civil disobedience"? There was none on the part of the Senator from California who was seeking to gather information at the presser - where people ask questions.
That's right. Because the press conference was not open to the public. Why can Padilla expect to ask a question when at his own press conference outside the federal building he refuses to take them?
 
This was not a public event where civil disobedience was tolerated.
Sure itvwas. It was avpress event with a hiv rep.

he had every right to rudly ask a question.

This is America not Russia or China.


Even at a public event disruptors frequently get the boot out of there. My patriotism? Geez, that was a sophomoric burn.
What happened to the patriotism on the rigjt.

Its the weirdest thing in my lifetime what has happened to you people
 
Post #1,043


Nah. Those giving pressers are interrupted. These interruptions are not "denying free speech rights".

(See this on zerohedge or fox?)
Re: (See this on zerohedge or fox?)

Get your information from reruns of the Howdy Doody Show?
 
Dud you fail high school civics.

Noem was acting as a government agent. People can question her. It isn't illegal to interrupt her asking a question, especially as you are being manhandled and dragged away for daring approach to ask a question.
If ever you have an opportunity to attend a press conference or any event inside a secure federal building, go ahead, stand up, move toward the speaker and see what happens. I don't care who the official is or their party affiliation. You just try it.
 
Back
Top Bottom