CaughtInThe
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2017
- Messages
- 83,692
- Reaction score
- 67,712
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
...and Ukrainian adults as Russian citizens are conned into thinking everything about the Ukrainian invasion and occupation is good and just and they're helping the Ukraine. Tucker is a disgrace to the United States of America.
Don't ever. Ever. Let a republican use that "both sides" BS.
View attachment 67380089
More Tucker hate?<>
Tuning in to Tucker could be for a drinking game. Every time Tucker makes his "did I just pee my pants face?", they take a drink.It's amazing, but democrats in the 25-54 demographic actually prefer Tucker Carlson over Rachel Maddow.
Carlson’s show is the #1 most-watched show among Democrats in the key demographic of 25-54 year-olds.
The data, from the month of October, showed that Carlson pulled in 101,000 viewers who self-identified as Democrats in the 25-54 demographic. MSNBC’s ‘The Rachel Maddow Show’ and Fox’s ‘The Five’ were tied for second place, each attracting 88,000 viewers in the key demo who self-identified as Democrats.”
source: https://usafeatures.news/2022/02/03/carlson-gets/
I wouldn't hang my hat on that source. Take a look at which sources the article cites.It's amazing, but democrats in the 25-54 demographic actually prefer Tucker Carlson over Rachel Maddow.
Carlson’s show is the #1 most-watched show among Democrats in the key demographic of 25-54 year-olds.
The data, from the month of October, showed that Carlson pulled in 101,000 viewers who self-identified as Democrats in the 25-54 demographic. MSNBC’s ‘The Rachel Maddow Show’ and Fox’s ‘The Five’ were tied for second place, each attracting 88,000 viewers in the key demo who self-identified as Democrats.”
source: https://usafeatures.news/2022/02/03/carlson-gets/
I went clicked back four links trying to find the original info and finally gave up.I wouldn't hang my hat on that source. Take a look at which sources the article cites.
She's full on pushing Russian disinformation, along with Tucker.Here's the full segment in question, so watch it and decide for yourself:
Patriots don't like traitors.
And Tulsi should just hop on over to the GOP.
You have no idea what Biden is or isn't doing. None of us has.More Tucker hate? He seems to be taking president Trump in their crazy fantasy world?
What is Biden doing? Pretty much nothing! Everything is spiraling out of control while
Biden fiddles?
Did Tulsi say something progressive, neoliberal, or neoconservative?
She says nothing progressive, IMO.
Her words about the situation and the Administrations response are pretty harsh, but what was the "disinformation" she was pushing?She's full on pushing Russian disinformation, along with Tucker.
More Tucker hate? He seems to be taking president Trump in their crazy fantasy world?
What is Biden doing? Pretty much nothing! Everything is spiraling out of control while
Biden fiddles?
and yet Fox News "thinks" they know exactly what he is or isn't doing.You have no idea what Biden is or isn't doing. None of us has.
More Tucker hate?
That is absurd.It's amazing, but democrats in the 25-54 demographic actually prefer Tucker Carlson over Rachel Maddow.
Carlson’s show is the #1 most-watched show among Democrats in the key demographic of 25-54 year-olds.
The data, from the month of October, showed that Carlson pulled in 101,000 viewers who self-identified as Democrats in the 25-54 demographic. MSNBC’s ‘The Rachel Maddow Show’ and Fox’s ‘The Five’ were tied for second place, each attracting 88,000 viewers in the key demo who self-identified as Democrats.”
source: https://usafeatures.news/2022/02/03/carlson-gets/
Nice story, but lies. While there should be 'talks', they hold basically no chance of ending this, as Ukraine and the results have indicated, so her suggestion is useless; and if she claimed the government is wildly promoting no-fly zones, that's a complete lie, they've done the opposite, refusing no-fly zones against great pressure from both Zelensky and the public.Tulsi Gabbard is exactly right about the perils of establishing a No-Fly Zone. She should be called in as a consultant for the Pentagon, who appartently cannot figure this out for themselves. (@ 3:14 in the video)
". . . On the No-Fly Zone that's being proposed and encouraged by these so-called foreign policy experts. Look - they're trying to act tough, Tucker, they're trying to say you know we've got to do something and I get it. There is so much suffering that we're seeing on our televisions all day and all night and I get that the American people are frustrated because we want to see this end.
Instead of our leaders doing the responsible thing and saying "okay, let's do our best to try to facilitate a negotiated outcome to actually end this conflict" - - a window of opportunity that president Zelinski opened up - you know - what - just 24 . . . 36 hours ago instead of doing that they're focused on "hey let's just do something look tough - enact a no-fly zone" which would not help the Ukrainian people it would make things worse - it's not going to help the American people - it'll make things worse.
It'll drastically escalate this crisis, and put our pilots directly against Russian pilots, putting us in conflict at war with Russia the other nuclear armed powers, pushing us - shoving us towards this brink of nuclear catastrophe and nuclear war that that would destroy the world . . . "
Tulsi Gabbard is a very wise person. Tucker was smart to have her insights on the Ukraine conflict.
Her big claim to fame is 'anti-war'. Which sometimes is progressive, like opposing the Iraq war.She says nothing progressive, IMO.