- Joined
- Feb 3, 2017
- Messages
- 21,509
- Reaction score
- 10,427
- Location
- NY
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Other
See, there are plenty of tough situations that don't require anyone to be shot to death.
That officer is a suicidal fool and a real chump. If the 4 had rushed him they could have shot him to death with his own sidearm.
But he is the type of police officer cop-hating Democratic politicians want, who see the only reason police should have sidearms is to give criminals an opportunity to take it and kill the cop with, for which in any lethal confrontation with criminals they want to cop to be the one killed. That officer is an idiot. He accomplished absolutely nothing other than endangering his own life and others if any one of them got his sidearm - all for no purpose whatsoever.
Other than endangering his own life, explain what he accomplished? NYC police should have a simple goals. 1.) Confront and arrest no one and 2.) avoid or leave any dangerous situation. That way they are safe - physically and legally.
There is word that describes the cop’s actions: restraint.
Four on one is gun time. Period.
No, his conduct was incompetence and taking unnecessary risks for no purpose whatsoever.
I'm confused. Do you mean to suggest that four attackers on one victim is NOT a deadly force scenario? How would you overcome four people attacking you at once? How Kung Fu are you?:lol:
Just go back to your cabin and eat raw fish... or meat... you are too tough for a civilized society...
I'm confused. Do you mean to suggest that four attackers on one victim is NOT a deadly force scenario? How would you overcome four people attacking you at once? How Kung Fu are you?
But I may be misinterpreting your post...
There is word that describes the cop’s actions: restraint.
I am a little kung fu but mostly shotokan and jui-jitsu... that said, it seems you answered your own question. This cop overcame four people attacking him with his stick... no deadly force needed.
Why was the cop alone?
There should always be at least two cops together -- in every American city nowadays.
Don't blame the mayor of NYC. Blame the foolish liberals who elected him!
No, his conduct was incompetence and taking unnecessary risks for no purpose whatsoever.
That officer is a suicidal fool and a real chump. If the 4 had rushed him they could have shot him to death with his own sidearm.
But he is the type of police officer cop-hating Democratic politicians want, who see the only reason police should have sidearms is to give criminals an opportunity to take it and kill the cop with, for which in any lethal confrontation with criminals they want to cop to be the one killed. That officer is an idiot. He accomplished absolutely nothing other than endangering his own life and others if any one of them got his sidearm - all for no purpose whatsoever.
Other than endangering his own life, explain what he accomplished? NYC police should have a simple goals. 1.) Confront and arrest no one and 2.) avoid or leave any dangerous situation. That way they are safe - physically and legally.
See, there are plenty of tough situations that don't require anyone to be shot to death.
See, there are plenty of tough situations that don't require anyone to be shot to death.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?