- Joined
- Jan 10, 2015
- Messages
- 14,012
- Reaction score
- 3,439
- Location
- Southern Oregon
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Clint Eastwood says the Democrats used the Gold Star family as pawns at the convention.
We got Clint leaving Craig's in WeHo Wednesday night, and he had criticism for both parties. He clearly thinks Trump crossed the line in his now-famous feud with the Khan family, but he thinks the Dems share in the blame for putting the grieving family on display for political gain.
Clint Eastwood Says Democrats Exploited Khan Family | TMZ.com
I think people on the whole are beginning to have doubts about victim culture. For sure using a victim to attack Trump then claiming that Trump cant defend himself against an attack..... because well, its a victim.....leaves a sour taste.
We need to get back to open and honest debate, with no special privileges for victims, or anyone else....let the ideas rise or fall under their own power, on their own worth.
This is the same strategy as BLM, Thugs attack the cops but the cops cant defend themselves because if they do they are guilty of systematic racism.
well that was revealing.It really started early 90's with the feminist assertion that questioning/doubting/challenging a womans story that she is a sexuall assault victim is an act of "re victimizing" her. Our choices according to them are silence and active support for the alleged victim...with silence being the asshole move...according to them.
I object.
I refuse to obey the command.
True/Not True is the test that matters to me, not the speakers victim status, that to me is irrelevant.
Clint Eastwood says the Democrats used the Gold Star family as pawns at the convention.
We got Clint leaving Craig's in WeHo Wednesday night, and he had criticism for both parties. He clearly thinks Trump crossed the line in his now-famous feud with the Khan family, but he thinks the Dems share in the blame for putting the grieving family on display for political gain.
Clint Eastwood Says Democrats Exploited Khan Family | TMZ.com
well that was revealing.
Getting in front of millions of people, and expecting the tragic loss of a son will shield you from accounting for the total lies you say is outrageous.
Mr. Khan needs to sit down and move on.
The Hillary for Prez forces, and their partners in the Media, should be shamed into silence for using this family, and thinking they could get away with it unscathed and unchallenged.
The DNC expoited the Khan Family just as much as the RNC exploited Patricia Smith.
Clint Eastwood says the Democrats used the Gold Star family as pawns at the convention.
We got Clint leaving Craig's in WeHo Wednesday night, and he had criticism for both parties. He clearly thinks Trump crossed the line in his now-famous feud with the Khan family, but he thinks the Dems share in the blame for putting the grieving family on display for political gain.
Clint Eastwood Says Democrats Exploited Khan Family | TMZ.com
If someone supports a particular candidate, and is invited to speak at the convention, why shouldn't they?
All this crying is making you people look thoroughly owned.
WHO?
You see I hope the problem with your equivalence theory...
Khizr Khan at the Democratic National Convention and Patricia Smith at the Republican National Convention: What's different | cleveland.comClinton's response: Clinton extended her sympathy to Smith, and refrained from politicizing Smith's remarks during an interview on Fox News.
"My heart goes out to both of them," Clinton said. "Losing a child under any circumstances, especially in this case. Two State Department employees, extraordinary men both of them, two CIA contractors gave their lives protecting our country, our values...
"I don't hold any ill feeling for someone who in that moment may not fully recall everything that was or wasn't said."
Who has suggested Khan didn't have a right to accept an invitation to speak?
This distortion of facts is making "you people" look thoroughly controlled by people telling you what to know and think.
What Khan shouldn't expect is to be shielded by his dead son so he could tell lies and distortions to the millions of people watching.
Saying that victims and alleged victims should not get extra rights to talk or extra protections from the consequences of talking is in complete violation of Victim Culture, which rules with an iron fist, as Trump is finding out.
Hillary Clinton did not attack Patricia Smith the way Donald Trump attacked the Khan Family. Which is why there isn't as much media attention on Patricia as there is o the Khans.
If Donald Trump had kept his big mouth shut, there wouldn't be all this major media attention on the Khans.
The media's foolish moralizing on Donald TrumpBut hold on: Isn't the real problem with Trump's counterattack that it involved a personal smear of the couple — and especially of Ghazala Khan, who stood silently by her husband's side while he delivered his speech? About this silence, Trump remarked to ABC News' George Stephanopoulos, "If you look at his wife, she was standing there. She had nothing to say. She probably, maybe she wasn't allowed to have anything to say." In an interview with Maureen Dowd, he repeated the insinuation: "I'd like to hear his wife say something."
This is not slander.
This deserves the "lol what?" treatment.
lol what?
If someone supports a particular candidate, and is invited to speak at the convention, why shouldn't they?
All this crying is making you people look thoroughly owned.
Yep, but since Trump does not support Victim Culture he is not likely to conform to Victim Culture.
But, of course he does, and did so by whining like a total ***** that he was 'viciously attacked'.
He comes off as a total candy-ass who can't take even the slightest bit of heat.
Getting in front of millions of people, and expecting the tragic loss of a son will shield you from accounting for the total lies you say is outrageous.
Mr. Khan needs to sit down and move on.
The Hillary for Prez forces, and their partners in the Media, should be shamed into silence for using this family, and thinking they could get away with it unscathed and unchallenged.
Not to mention the hypocrisy of trying to lecture anyone on the US constitution when you believe and have written documents proclaiming that all law should be subservient to Sharia Law.
I think people on the whole are beginning to have doubts about victim culture. For sure using a victim to attack Trump then claiming that Trump cant defend himself against an attack..... because well, its a victim.....leaves a sour taste.
We need to get back to open and honest debate, with no special privileges for victims, or anyone else....let the ideas rise or fall under their own power, on their own worth.
This is the same strategy as BLM, Thugs attack the cops but the cops cant defend themselves because if they do they are guilty of systematic racism.
It really started early 90's with the feminist assertion that questioning/doubting/challenging a womans story that she is a sexuall assault victim is an act of "re victimizing" her. Our choices according to them are silence and active support for the alleged victim...with silence being the asshole move...according to them.
I object.
I refuse to obey the command.
True/Not True is the test that matters to me, not the speakers victim status, that to me is irrelevant.
well that was revealing.
The DNC expoited the Khan Family just as much as the RNC exploited Patricia Smith.
Saying that victims and alleged victims should not get extra rights to talk or extra protections from the consequences of talking is in complete violation of Victim Culture, which rules with an iron fist, as Trump is finding out.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?