• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Chicago's Black Ghetto

"Thug, thug, thug."

That is all conservatives call Trayvon. I grew up in the 80's Trayvon wasn't a thug, Trayvon was a kid. Sure did Trayvon smoke weed? I'm sure, just like the snotty nosed white kids in Westwood or Bel Air. Trayvon was a kid who prbably did juvenile things. What is a real thug? A real thug robs people for everything and leaves them with just a pair of shoes. A thug is not dress apparel or how you talk or walk, this is where a lot of white folks get it mixed up. Thugs rob people for a living. Trayvon was with his dad buying skittles and tea.

In my opinion I don't care if Trayvon was buying products to nake cocaine, the point is Trayvon was minding his own business. If I am a resident in the neighborhood as long as another resident is maintaining the peace its not my business to butt in. But Zimmerman on the other hand...

St Trayvon of Skittles wasn't shot because he smoked weed or how he was dressed or how he walked or talked.This is where a lot of black folks get it mixed up in their rush to defend anything another black person does.

St Trayvon of Skittles was shot because he thought he was tough and attacked a "creepy ass cracker" who just happened to be carrying.
The worst and last mistake he ever made.
He should have kept his hands to himself.
 
As was pointed out earlier, you can be killed by one punch. How many are you willing to take? If someone was on your chest pounding your head on concrete how long would you let them do it?

St Trayvon of Skittles should have kept his hands to himself.

Well Trayvon unfortunately lost his life and yes, maybe if he kept his hands to himself he would have lived. But you know what Zimmerman's life is over anyway. Do you honestly think he can go anywhere and be public? Nope. Zimmerman's death began the moment Trayvon stopped breathing.
 
St Trayvon of Skittles wasn't shot because he smoked weed or how he was dressed or how he walked or talked.This is where a lot of black folks get it mixed up in their rush to defend anything another black person does.

St Trayvon of Skittles was shot because he thought he was tough and attacked a "creepy ass cracker" who just happened to be carrying.
The worst and last mistake he ever made.
He should have kept his hands to himself.

At the end of the day Zimmerman is a coward and people that think like Zimmerman are cowards to me.
 
Well Trayvon unfortunately lost his life and yes, maybe if he kept his hands to himself he would have lived. But you know what Zimmerman's life is over anyway. Do you honestly think he can go anywhere and be public? Nope. Zimmerman's death began the moment Trayvon stopped breathing.

zimmerman's fate is no concern of mine, but I think he can disappear any time he wants. The world is a big place.
 
At the end of the day Zimmerman is a coward and people that think like Zimmerman are cowards to me.

People are growing tired of the disproportionate levels of negro crime and violence and more and more are waking up and are prepared to defend themselves if attacked.

That isn't cowardice.
 
This is white puritanical garbage.

I was a child.

My mother was struggling between jobs not to mention my mother had cancer. Yeah I had a lot of options. Yeah at two years old I was old enough to invest in buying houses.

It would help Hypersonic if you mentioned which hood you lived and grew up in and what era.
 
"Thug, thug, thug."

That is all conservatives call Trayvon. I grew up in the 80's Trayvon wasn't a thug, Trayvon was a kid. Sure did Trayvon smoke weed? I'm sure, just like the snotty nosed white kids in Westwood or Bel Air. Trayvon was a kid who prbably did juvenile things. What is a real thug? A real thug robs people for everything and leaves them with just a pair of shoes. A thug is not dress apparel or how you talk or walk, this is where a lot of white folks get it mixed up. Thugs rob people for a living. Trayvon was with his dad buying skittles and tea.

In my opinion I don't care if Trayvon was buying products to nake cocaine, the point is Trayvon was minding his own business. If I am a resident in the neighborhood as long as another resident is maintaining the peace its not my business to butt in. But Zimmerman on the other hand...

This is where you are wrong.

How can you equate punching a man with minding his own business?
 
At the end of the day Zimmerman is a coward and people that think like Zimmerman are cowards to me.

We we can all sleep well at night knowing your opinión is meaningless.

The next time you are in a fight, and I am sure there will be a next time, just put your hands at your side and let the person kill you. That is what you think Zimmerman should have done, so by allmeans you should too.
 
The Black Ghetto on the Southside of Chicago has been a White man created and enforced segregated community since the 1920's.

What's your beef? So every white person is responsible for the crime on the south side of Chicago? Brilliant. You must have a 50 pound brain (sarcasm).
 
"Thug, thug, thug."

That is all conservatives call Trayvon. I grew up in the 80's Trayvon wasn't a thug, Trayvon was a kid. Sure did Trayvon smoke weed? I'm sure, just like the snotty nosed white kids in Westwood or Bel Air. Trayvon was a kid who prbably did juvenile things. What is a real thug? A real thug robs people for everything and leaves them with just a pair of shoes. A thug is not dress apparel or how you talk or walk, this is where a lot of white folks get it mixed up. Thugs rob people for a living. Trayvon was with his dad buying skittles and tea.

In my opinion I don't care if Trayvon was buying products to nake cocaine, the point is Trayvon was minding his own business. If I am a resident in the neighborhood as long as another resident is maintaining the peace its not my business to butt in. But Zimmerman on the other hand...

Trayvon was a thug, now a dead thug. Or thug wannabe by his facebook stupidity.
I guess Trayvon would still not be a thug if he had beat Zimmerman to death though, right?
 
Zimmerman lost a fight. I've lost fights before. We all do. It is the nature of the world but I don't believe in killing kids. Zimmerman should've rested comfortably in the fact that although he lost a fist fight, he knew he had the power to take life. Zimmerman was and is a coward.
Stop with your idiotic spin.
It was not a fight.
It was an attack.
That is the evidence.
There is a big difference between the two. Obviously you didn't know that.

Zimmerman acting justly, after help he called for didn't come, is not the act of a coward.
But IMO, I would say your saying so is the act of a coward.


"Thug, thug, thug."
:naughty
Apparently you are confused as to what was said.
Read it again because you are still confusing the two which you were told not to.

Attacking a person are the actions of a thug.
So stop trying to confuse the two.


That is all conservatives call Trayvon.
Wrong! So stop exaggerating.


I grew up in the 80's Trayvon wasn't a thug, Trayvon was a kid. Sure did Trayvon smoke weed? I'm sure, just like the snotty nosed white kids in Westwood or Bel Air. Trayvon was a kid who prbably did juvenile things. What is a real thug? A real thug robs people for everything and leaves them with just a pair of shoes. A thug is not dress apparel or how you talk or walk, this is where a lot of white folks get it mixed up. Thugs rob people for a living.
Your definition, and the generic definition, do not match.

thug
THəg/
noun
noun: thug; plural noun: thugs; noun: Thug

1. a violent person, esp. a criminal.
synonyms: ruffian, hooligan, vandal, hoodlum, gangster, villain, criminal;
informal: tough, bruiser, hardman, goon, heavy, enforcer, hired gun, hood
"one of Capone's thugs"

2.historical
a member of a religious organization of robbers and assassins in India. Devotees of the goddess Kali,
the Thugs waylaid and strangled their victims, usually travelers, in a ritually prescribed manner.
They were suppressed by the British in the 1830s.
Google Search: Define+Thug


Trayvon was with his dad buying skittles and tea.
Still showing you do not know the evidence of this case. Your statement is blatantly false.


In my opinion I don't care if Trayvon was buying products to nake cocaine, the point is Trayvon was minding his own business. If I am a resident in the neighborhood as long as another resident is maintaining the peace its not my business to butt in. But Zimmerman on the other hand...
Exactly. You don't care!
You don't care about the facts because instead of recognizing the facts, you choose to see something that doesn't exist.
Even in this comment you either ignore to spin, or just do not know the facts.
Trayvon was not minding his own business.
Looking into homes is not minding his own business. Nor is acting out violently like a thug.

So as your point is wrong, you have no relevant point.
 
Liberals have run Chicago forever, why is there a black ghetto?
 
Liberals have run Chicago forever, why is there a black ghetto?
Didn't you just establish that Liberals have run Chicago forever?
 
What's your beef? So every white person is responsible for the crime on the south side of Chicago? Brilliant. You must have a 50 pound brain (sarcasm).
Not any more than every white person is responsible for slavery. Your brain obviously lacks certain functions, like recognizing cause and effect.
 
Not any more than every white person is responsible for slavery. Your brain obviously lacks certain functions, like recognizing cause and effect.

The OP says it's all white peoples fault...
Save that "cause and effect" dodge. It doesn't work.
 
Stop with your idiotic spin.
It was not a fight.
It was an attack.
That is the evidence.
There is a big difference between the two. Obviously you didn't know that.

Zimmerman acting justly, after help he called for didn't come, is not the act of a coward.
But IMO, I would say your saying so is the act of a coward.


:naughty
Apparently you are confused as to what was said.
Read it again because you are still confusing the two which you were told not to.

Attacking a person are the actions of a thug.
So stop trying to confuse the two.


Wrong! So stop exaggerating.


Your definition, and the generic definition, do not match.

thug
THəg/
noun
noun: thug; plural noun: thugs; noun: Thug

1. a violent person, esp. a criminal.
synonyms: ruffian, hooligan, vandal, hoodlum, gangster, villain, criminal;
informal: tough, bruiser, hardman, goon, heavy, enforcer, hired gun, hood
"one of Capone's thugs"

2.historical
a member of a religious organization of robbers and assassins in India. Devotees of the goddess Kali,
the Thugs waylaid and strangled their victims, usually travelers, in a ritually prescribed manner.
They were suppressed by the British in the 1830s.
Google Search: Define+Thug


Still showing you do not know the evidence of this case. Your statement is blatantly false.


Exactly. You don't care!
You don't care about the facts because instead of recognizing the facts, you choose to see something that doesn't exist.
Even in this comment you either ignore to spin, or just do not know the facts.
Trayvon was not minding his own business.
Looking into homes is not minding his own business. Nor is acting out violently like a thug.

So as your point is wrong, you have no relevant point.

Cowards call losing a fight an attack. That is my opinion. Zimmerman is a coward, a dangerous coward at that. Why debate this with me?
 
Cowards call losing a fight an attack. That is my opinion. Zimmerman is a coward, a dangerous coward at that. Why debate this with me?

LMAO you googled thug just because its in the dictionary it must be true. I once outsmarted a professor about his own book, it doesn't mean I know more than the teacher, it means I had more understanding about that particular subject
 
Cowards call losing a fight an attack. That is my opinion. Zimmerman is a coward, a dangerous coward at that. Why debate this with me?
You have already been told. It was not a fight but an attack.
There is a difference. Learn it.


BTW, I am not debating you.
I am correcting you.
Learn the difference.
 
You have already been told. It was not a fight but an attack.
There is a difference. Learn it.


BTW, I am not debating you.
I am correcting you.
Learn the difference.

I call it a fight you call it an attack. No witnesses to the supposed attack. You werent corr3cting me, you was defending a coward.
 
I call it a fight you call it an attack. No witnesses to the supposed attack. You werent corr3cting me, you was defending a coward.
Wrong!
The witness is Zimmerman.
Supported by physical evidence of injury, supported by a lack of injury to Trayvon.

There is no evidence to counter that which is known.

It was an attack, not a fight.


And wrong again, as you were being corrected with factual information.
There is no debate here. You are wrong and have been shown to be wrong at every turn.
 
Cowards call losing a fight an attack. That is my opinion. Zimmerman is a coward, a dangerous coward at that. Why debate this with me?
LMAO you googled thug just because its in the dictionary it must be true. I once outsmarted a professor about his own book, it doesn't mean I know more than the teacher, it means I had more understanding about that particular subject
:lamo
He quotes himself, but replies to what I provided.
:doh

You are wrong again. Words have meanings.
In this case a "thug" is a violent person.
Trayvon was acting violently.
 
Cowards call losing a fight an attack. That is my opinion. Zimmerman is a coward, a dangerous coward at that. Why debate this with me?

A fight would imply both sides agreed to it. An attack is one person hitting another person without reason.

Can you provide any evidence that Zimmerman agreed to the fight?

You really think all cops are cowards?

If Martin would have attacked a pólice officer, and that pólice officer had no back up, like he did Zimmerman, he would have been shot just the same.
 
Not any more than every white person is responsible for slavery. Your brain obviously lacks certain functions, like recognizing cause and effect.

Lacks certain functions that yours has like making up facts out of thin air and making sweeping generalizations so that everything fits perfectly into your hate filled version of the world.
 
Back
Top Bottom