• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Chicago's Black Ghetto

No because I know how to fight. Only time I use a weapon if the guy uses a weapon.

So after he smashes your head into the cement once and disorients you, you would let him kill you instread of pulling the gun and saving your life.

This is why the human race is in trouble.

The survival instinct has been bred out of people.

At least Zimmerman still had his.
 
I blame racism on Hobbits who arrogantly segregated themselves 10,000 years ago. It's their fault. Damn hobbits for all the trouble they cause.

ku-xlarge.jpg

...and notice;
africans have no neanderthal dna, yet they're still called homo sapiens.
 
As for Trayvon the sad part out of all this is conservatives focus on him being a supposed thug rather than a 17 year old human being who was killed by a wannabe cop.

An unarmed 17 year old human being who was killed by a wannabe cop. ;)
You both are not objective about this at all, and have allowed your bias to to twist the truth for you and engage in vitriol.


Although wanting to be a cop is not a bad thing, your use of it is meant to be demeaning.
But where you fail is in the knowledge that Zimmerman wanting to be a cop was at the time no longer the true.

Had either of you bothered to inform yourself of the actual facts, you would know that.
So you are both making false statements in an attempt to vilify Zimmerman. That is called pathetic.

It is as bad, if not worse then, painting a picture of Zimmerman as violent because of his coming to the aid of a friend against a perceived violent person who was an unbeknown undercover officer.



And these vitriolic statements of yours calling him a wanna-be, is exactly why you have retaliation of the same form against Trayvon.


As for Trayvon the sad part out of all this is conservatives focus on him being a supposed thug rather than a 17 year old human being who was killed by a wannabe cop.
Attacking a person are the actions of a thug.
So stop trying to confuse the two.


An unarmed 17 year old human being who was killed by a wannabe cop.
The same goes for you calling him unarmed.
The fact is, he was using his body as a weapon to attack another human.
 
Difference between us is I own 3 guns

Sigma stainless steel 9mm made by S&W

Glock 20

Glock 34

I have no problems shooting someone in the face if they are defacing my property. It has nothing to do with being tough. It is how I was raised. I am college educated, I have no problem getting rough. The point is I dont target kids. Trayvon was a kid nothing more. Zimmerman didnt know how to fist fight so he lost. Then he shoots a kid. He is a ***** to me.

only 3????? lightweight.... :laughat:

FWIW: Trayvon was not a "kid". he was a punk-ass thug. and typical of his ilk, he wanted to get physical at the first sign of the slightest disrespect. too bad for him the guy he jumped was packing
 


You both are not objective about this at all, and have allowed your bias to to twist the truth for you and engage in vitriol.


Although wanting to be a cop is not a bad thing, your use of it is meant to be demeaning.
But where you fail is in the knowledge that Zimmerman wanting to be a cop was at the time no longer the true.

Had either of you bothered to inform yourself of the actual facts, you would know that.
So you are both making false statements in an attempt to vilify Zimmerman. That is called pathetic.

It is as bad, if not worse then, painting a picture of Zimmerman as violent because of his coming to the aid of a friend against a perceived violent person who was an unbeknown undercover officer.



And these vitriolic statements of yours calling him a wanna-be, is exactly why you have retaliation of the same form against Trayvon.


Attacking a person are the actions of a thug.
So stop trying to confuse the two.



The same goes for you calling him unarmed.
The fact is, he was using his body as a weapon to attack another human.
Yeah yeah...Trayvon was armed with his hands and feet. We've heard that nonsense over and over again. Z's lucky to have gotten away with killing an unarmed man. He would not have fared well in a Florida Penitentiary.
 
I've noticed the same thing in the South even going back over thirty years ago.

When you look at the Left Coast, in particular Los Angeles County the extremely navy blue areas like L.A.'s Westside, Beverly Hills, Pacific Palisades, Santa Monica and Malibu are kept segregated on purpose.

The libs actually raised taxes to continue segregation by spending tens of billions of dollars to build a subway so those of color wouldn't move into their neighborhoods so they could be close to their daytime jobs of being toilet cleaners, nannies, and gardners.

Cali is a great example. I always thought of it as a third world country, a Brazil within our own borders, because of the amazing amount of segregation, wealth disparity and "death squad" like, aggressive law enforcement. Not sure why it has a reputation of being Left Wing---the place is as Far Right as Pinochet's Chile.
 
Yeah yeah...Trayvon was armed with his hands and feet. We've heard that nonsense over and over again. Z's lucky to have gotten away with killing an unarmed man. He would not have fared well in a Florida Penitentiary.
There goes that bias again.
What a shame.

Trayvon used his own body as a weapon of assault and you sit there and support it even though all the evidence shows he was in the wrong. That is how twisted you view of things are.
And is why you have to say he was unarmed to spin the truth that he was in the wrong.

Zimmerman is lucky to have gotten away with out severe injury from Trayvon.
As for his shooting of him? It was justified by Trayvon's actions in attacking him. That isn't luck, but justice.
 
Last edited:
Why is Chicago a black ghetto??
Is there work?
 
There goes that bias again.
What a shame.

Trayvon used his own body as a weapon of assault and you sit there and support it even though all the evidence shows he was in the wrong. That is how twisted you view of things are.
And is why you have to say he was unarmed to spin the truth that he was in the wrong.

Zimmerman is lucky to have gotten away with out severe injury from Trayvon.
As for his shooting of him? It was justified by Trayvon's actions in attacking him. That isn't luck, but justice.
WHere I come from the guy with the gun is armed; the guy without a weapon is unarmed. GLad to see you rewrite the definitions to suit you.

Next time a Black guy shoots an unarmed white guy while robbing a convenience store, I'll be sure to remind everyone that Excon says the white guy was armed with his hands and feet :roll:
 
WHere I come from the guy with the gun is armed; the guy without a weapon is unarmed. GLad to see you rewrite the definitions to suit you.

Next time a Black guy shoots an unarmed white guy while robbing a convenience store, I'll be sure to remind everyone that Excon says the white guy was armed with his hands and feet :roll:
:doh

You saying he was unarmed is you trying to spin. Period.
You are trying to make it appear as though Zimmerman was in the wrong when he wasn't.

Trayvon was attacking him.
He was acting out violently and was using his body as a weapon. Period.
Stop trying to spin the truth.

Zimmerman acted justly in shooting the person who was violently assaulting him.
 
:doh

You saying he was unarmed is you trying to spin. Period.
You are trying to make it appear as though Zimmerman was in the wrong when he wasn't.

Trayvon was attacking him.
He was acting out violently and was using his body as a weapon. Period.
Stop trying to spin the truth.

Zimmerman acted justly in shooting the person who was violently assaulting him.
Not until this Martin case did I ever hear someone trying to spin the facts such that an unarmed man is now armed, while the guy who had the gun was an innocent victim just trying to defend himself. I got to hand it to you Righites, your sense of reality is definitely what you make it out to be.
 
Not until this Martin case did I ever hear someone trying to spin the facts such that an unarmed man is now armed, while the guy who had the gun was an innocent victim just trying to defend himself. I got to hand it to you Righites, your sense of reality is definitely what you make it out to be.
There you go trying to spin again.
Trayvon was in the wrong.
Zimmerman used his gun in exactly the manner it was to be used for "self defense".


Btw, unarmed generally means, in these types of situations, as being without weapon.
Trayvon used his body as a weapon whether you like it or not.
And your use of "unarmed" is spin, to make it appear as though Trayvon was an innocent when the exact opposite is true.

And you purposely do that to cast negative light upon Zimmerman, of which he does not deserve.
Which is dishonesty.
Had those on your side of things not resulted to such dishonesty to spin the story, those on this side would not have to point out the technicality that he was actually armed with his body that he was using as a weapon.
So stop with the spin.
 
Last edited:
Not until this Martin case did I ever hear someone trying to spin the facts such that an unarmed man is now armed, while the guy who had the gun was an innocent victim just trying to defend himself. I got to hand it to you Righites, your sense of reality is definitely what you make it out to be.


An unarmed person can kill you with one punch.

(guess the race of the people involved in these 2 attacks and know that the sucker punch is a favorite tactic of negroes)


‘I Hate White People’: Random Racial Rampage in New York Leaves One Man Brain Dead | TheBlaze.com

The New York City Police Department’s (NYPD) Hate Crimes Task Force is investigating a savage attack that took place Wednesday afternoon in Union Square, after witnesses say a man vowed to attack white people before assaulting multiple individuals and leaving one man brain dead.

Man killed by one punch in Vegas casino brawl - CBS News
LAS VEGAS — A tourist from Florida was jailed on a murder charge Wednesday in the death of a Utah man who died after a one-punch fight between two tourists inside a Las Vegas Strip casino.

etc...etc...etc...
I can list a dozen more..

St. Trayvon of Skittles should have kept his hands to himself...like we were all taught in kindergarten and he'd still be alive.
 
Cali is a great example. I always thought of it as a third world country, a Brazil within our own borders, because of the amazing amount of segregation, wealth disparity and "death squad" like, aggressive law enforcement. Not sure why it has a reputation of being Left Wing---the place is as Far Right as Pinochet's Chile.
I see your goal is to relate wealth disparity and police brutality to the right wing. But many of the rich in California are liberals. They are what we call "limousine liberals"- exempt from getting their hands dirty in helping the poor.

And the police are public union people. That seems very left wing to me.

California is pretty much as liberal as it gets.
 
Cali is a great example. I always thought of it as a third world country, a Brazil within our own borders, because of the amazing amount of segregation, wealth disparity and "death squad" like, aggressive law enforcement. Not sure why it has a reputation of being Left Wing---the place is as Far Right as Pinochet's Chile.

It's known as Liberal Fascism.
 
I see your goal is to relate wealth disparity and police brutality to the right wing. But many of the rich in California are liberals. They are what we call "limousine liberals"- exempt from getting their hands dirty in helping the poor.

And the police are public union people. That seems very left wing to me.

California is pretty much as liberal as it gets.

It's known as Liberal Fascism.
You two may be right.
 
The Black Ghetto on the Southside of Chicago has been a White man created and enforced segregated community since the 1920's.

So the gang violence of today is all the white mans fault? Hahhaahahahahahahaha
 
Must have been tough dealing with those white gang bangers.

You did have a choice, Baldwin Hills. Or Baldwin Hills could have been used as an example of what a hood could be.

This is white puritanical garbage.

I was a child.

My mother was struggling between jobs not to mention my mother had cancer. Yeah I had a lot of options. Yeah at two years old I was old enough to invest in buying houses.
 
Must have been tough dealing with those white gang bangers.

You did have a choice, Baldwin Hills. Or Baldwin Hills could have been used as an example of what a hood could be.

This is white puritanical garbage.

I was a child.

My mother was struggling between jobs not to mention my mother had cancer. Yeah I had a lot of options. Yeah at two years old I was old enough to invest in buying houses to move us out the hood.
 
So after he smashes your head into the cement once and disorients you, you would let him kill you instread of pulling the gun and saving your life.

This is why the human race is in trouble.

The survival instinct has been bred out of people.

At least Zimmerman still had his.

"After he smashes your head"

My friends would say "Your Extra'd out"

Zimmerman lost a fight. I've lost fights before. We all do. It is the nature of the world but I don't believe in killing kids. Zimmerman should've rested comfortably in the fact that although he lost a fist fight, he knew he had the power to take life. Zimmerman was and is a coward.
 
"After he smashes your head"

My friends would say "Your Extra'd out"

Zimmerman lost a fight. I've lost fights before. We all do. It is the nature of the world but I don't believe in killing kids. Zimmerman should've rested comfortably in the fact that although he lost a fist fight, he knew he had the power to take life. Zimmerman was and is a coward.

That sort of attitude and blindness to reality will keep the black ghettos alive and well for another hundred years. It's all up to you.
 
"After he smashes your head"

My friends would say "Your Extra'd out"

Zimmerman lost a fight. I've lost fights before. We all do. It is the nature of the world but I don't believe in killing kids. Zimmerman should've rested comfortably in the fact that although he lost a fist fight, he knew he had the power to take life. Zimmerman was and is a coward.

As was pointed out earlier, you can be killed by one punch. How many are you willing to take? If someone was on your chest pounding your head on concrete how long would you let them do it?

St Trayvon of Skittles should have kept his hands to himself.
 


You both are not objective about this at all, and have allowed your bias to to twist the truth for you and engage in vitriol.


Although wanting to be a cop is not a bad thing, your use of it is meant to be demeaning.
But where you fail is in the knowledge that Zimmerman wanting to be a cop was at the time no longer the true.

Had either of you bothered to inform yourself of the actual facts, you would know that.
So you are both making false statements in an attempt to vilify Zimmerman. That is called pathetic.

It is as bad, if not worse then, painting a picture of Zimmerman as violent because of his coming to the aid of a friend against a perceived violent person who was an unbeknown undercover officer.



And these vitriolic statements of yours calling him a wanna-be, is exactly why you have retaliation of the same form against Trayvon.


Attacking a person are the actions of a thug.
So stop trying to confuse the two.



The same goes for you calling him unarmed.
The fact is, he was using his body as a weapon to attack another human.

"Thug, thug, thug."

That is all conservatives call Trayvon. I grew up in the 80's Trayvon wasn't a thug, Trayvon was a kid. Sure did Trayvon smoke weed? I'm sure, just like the snotty nosed white kids in Westwood or Bel Air. Trayvon was a kid who prbably did juvenile things. What is a real thug? A real thug robs people for everything and leaves them with just a pair of shoes. A thug is not dress apparel or how you talk or walk, this is where a lot of white folks get it mixed up. Thugs rob people for a living. Trayvon was with his dad buying skittles and tea.

In my opinion I don't care if Trayvon was buying products to nake cocaine, the point is Trayvon was minding his own business. If I am a resident in the neighborhood as long as another resident is maintaining the peace its not my business to butt in. But Zimmerman on the other hand...
 
Back
Top Bottom