- Joined
- Sep 18, 2011
- Messages
- 88,714
- Reaction score
- 65,726
- Location
- New Mexico
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Socialist
It is a pity that he is a socialist.
It's a pity you ignore policy because you can't get beyond labels.
It is a pity that he is a socialist.
It is a pity that he is a socialist.
Wrong. With enough bombs the problem is solved. Permanently.
The Kurd militia leaders have said they can do this fighting on their own if they are just given the weapons and the logistical support.
If youve seen the news then its obvious the ones who have made the most gains against ISIS are the Iranians and Hezbollah while the US backed Iraqis are the ones who always lose their ground.
Pretty sure we've tried that. How's it turning out?
Imagine Canada flies some fighter jets and bombs the hell out of Cleveland. Gangs, you know. Gotta take them out. Except in the process they kill a bunch of children.
What do you think would happen? No hostility towards Canada?
We don't bomb indiscriminately. We use precision weapons. Of course, you need people on the ground to make that work, and President Airhead refuses to do it.
'Nothing to stop ISIS': Attack underscores threat facing US force in Egypt | Fox News
Is there a chance that we can defeat ISIS? It seems like all those troops we have now there are not enough and the airstrikes can't improve the situation. Looks like we've lost the initiative, ISIS soldiers are everywhere in the Middle East now. Half of Syria and Iraq are captured by ISIS forces and their ideas are spreading out to the neighboring countries. What can we do in this situation? Do we need to place there more troops or it would be better to abandon the Middle East and let it rot?
We don't bomb indiscriminately. We use precision weapons. Of course, you need people on the ground to make that work, and President Airhead refuses to do it.
President Airhead recognizes something you don't.
'Nothing to stop ISIS': Attack underscores threat facing US force in Egypt | Fox News
Is there a chance that we can defeat ISIS? It seems like all those troops we have now there are not enough and the airstrikes can't improve the situation. Looks like we've lost the initiative, ISIS soldiers are everywhere in the Middle East now. Half of Syria and Iraq are captured by ISIS forces and their ideas are spreading out to the neighboring countries. What can we do in this situation? Do we need to place there more troops or it would be better to abandon the Middle East and let it rot?
Yeah? What's that?
That this is something America can't solve by invasions and bombings. That attacks the symptoms only to make the disease worse.
Huh. That must be why Japan and Germany today are militaristic fascist empires, and why India is ruled by a series of petty local lords.
Huh. That must be why Japan and Germany today are militaristic fascist empires, and why India is ruled by a series of petty local lords.
Huh. I wonder if it's possible that completely different circumstances and completely different enemies might possibly be solved by different strategies.
If - as you argued - the problem is inherent in the culture, then that is how you can indeed forcibly change a culture. Sorry if your argument was falsified :shrug: but it is so.
I said that? When?
That is my understanding of your argument - that you are discussing the broad cultural appeal of Islamist Fundamentalism.
If you are referring instead to the more narrow ideological worldview of the Islamic State, then the story there is a bit better situated. Because of the eschatalogical claims that ISIL makes about itself, it's ideology is actually fairly brittle. Smash the state, and you smash the narrative. You can't claim to be the Emir al-Mumineen and Khalifa and then get repeatedly schwacked and destroyed by the infidels. We'd have to work our way through (as I recall) 4 of them to make sure, but then we'll be there.
It's a pity you ignore policy because you can't get beyond labels.
Oooooh! Scary word. Soooocialist. You must be terrified.
The French are dealing with the Muslims themselves they will have no pity for them. As is India. That leaves Pakistan. Considering the rest of the world would probably cheer the demise of ISIS and the other Jihadist nutjobs, I doubt seriously that the Pakistanis would like to join their brothers and sisters in heaven.France? India? Pakistan?
Is this a vote for genocide?
Utter nonsense. This is not imperial Japan.
Unfortunately, President Airhead has declined to give them weapons and logistical support.