- Joined
- Jul 6, 2017
- Messages
- 122,485
- Reaction score
- 19,845
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Is that English? I dont even know what you are asking? Are you asking why the gop did that?You remember reading this?
Is that English? I dont even know what you are asking? Are you asking why the gop did that?You remember reading this?
The problem is both parties believe that when they win an election by one vote they have a mandate to shove their values down 100% of the population. Compromise only means forcing the other side to do things your way.We can argue over policy, and not intentions, when you stop worshiping cartoon con men like Trump and stop listening to media that is designed to warp your mind (basically what Bannon has admitted to). We can't discuss policy because we don't live in the same reality. Your guys are listening to Rudy Giuliani and that lady who outlined a plan to literally steal the election. Even Chris Christie knows the jig is up.
Chris Christie calls Trump's legal team a 'national embarrassment'
A staunch ally of Donald Trump said Sunday it was time for the President to end his futile gambit to overturn the results of the election.www.cnn.com
You only need hard facts when Trump contests elections.LOL. Wait'll the Russian Mafia money laundering through Trump properties comes up in court.
According to the gop. LolYou only need hard facts when Trump contests elections.
My point is there hasn't been a special counsel appointed by the Senate to investigate the 2020 election because the Electoral College hasn't certified a presidential winner for 2020, yet. Do you need a further explain of the Electoral College in American presidential elections?Is that English? I dont even know what you are asking? Are you asking why the gop did that?
Why wait until then? No requirement to waitMy point is there hasn't been a special counsel appointed by the Senate because the Electoral College hasn't certified a presidential winner for 2020, yet. Do you need a further explain of the Electoral College in American presidential elections?
Do you think the Steele Dossier was hard facts? Do you think the testimony of some American ambassadors to The Ukraine were hard facts?According to the gop. Lol
For a truly constuctive political discussion , common ground is not desirable. Common ground makes your brain apathetic. If you want someone to conter anything you say with I agree, you can pretape that answer. Diversity on the other hand, makes you think through your arguments and beliefs . Even if you stick to your initial convictions, diversity developes you.Salut, Dans La Rue:
In all fairness, try having a reasonable discussion with a crusading, anti-capitalist, anarchistic, non-binary, non-linear thinking, meme-wielding, environmental activist/zealot about state policy regarding just about anything. There's not a lot of common ground there for a meeting of the realities, let alone the minds. Unless you immediately and unconditionally capitulate to "their" demands to define and redefine the terms of the issue, almost no civil debate is possible.
Apologies in advance if my example offends some, but in truth I have had this exact discussion several times before. We need a modern Rosetta Stone sometimes to translate between people in the same community.
Cheers and be well.
Evilroddy.
The gop did. They appointed the special prosecutorDo you think the Steele Dossier was hard facts? Do you think the testimony of some American ambassadors to The Ukraine were hard facts?
If the GOP hold the Senate, yes, there'll be an investigation into the 2020 presidential election and election reform, in general, will also be investigated in the Senate.Why wait until then? No requirement to wait
Are you saying a special prosecutor will be appointed then?
Say that...I want it on the record
An investigation by who? A special prosecutor? Where do you get this information? Who has called for that?If the GOP hold the Senate, yes, there'll be an investigation into the 2020 presidential election and election reform, in general, will also be investigated in the Senate.
If the GOP hold the Senate, yes, there'll be an investigation into the 2020 presidential election and election reform, in general, will also be investigated in the Senate.
Unlike the other major political party in the US, the GOP didn't care if the GOP candidate won the election for president in 2016. The GOP is concerned with any allegations of elections not being free and fair.The gop did. They appointed the special prosecutor
Who is calling for one now? Name them
My crystal ball isn't working.An investigation by who? A special prosecutor? Where do you get this information? Who has called for that?
That's nice. Give me a name.Unlike the other major political party in the US, the GOP didn't care if the GOP candidate won the election. The GOP is concerned with any allegations of elections not being free and fair.
Got it.My crystal ball isn't working.
I can guess some Trump supporters would say that Covid would be over by the end of the election because the reason to get rid of Trump (the Covid scare) wouldn't be necessary if Trump were defeated.Some Trump supporters liked to say, "The day after the election, Covid will disappear."
I guess they forgot they said that.
I can guess some Trump supporters would say that Covid would be over by the end of the election because the reason to get rid of Trump (the Covid scare) wouldn't be necessary if Trump were defeated.
You asked me why a special prosecutor hasn't been named in the Senate to investigate the 2020 presidential election. I gave you the answer. Then you asked my opinion if there will be a special prosecutor investigation in the Senate over the 2020 presidential election. I gave you my opinion that, if the Senate is still controlled by GOPs, there'll be a special prosecutor investigation into the 2020 presidential election.Got it.
So no one.
I can name half a dozen gop senators who called for a special prosecutor in 2016.
This is just your feelz
Why do you bring up that some Trump supporters said there won't be Covid after the election if of course?Well, of course.
Based on your feelings. Got it.You asked me why a special prosecutor hasn't been named in the Senate to investigate the 2020 presidential election. I gave you the answer. Then you asked my opinion if there will be a special prosecutor investigation in the Senate over the 2020 presidential election. I gave you my opinion that, if the Senate is still controlled by GOPs, there'll be a special prosecutor investigation into the 2020 presidential election.
Why do you bring up that some Trump supporters said there won't be Covid after the election if of course?
All righty then, I guess there's no reason to answer your disingenuous questions, then.Based on your feelings. Got it.
I think by then trump will have been charged and facing trial in New York. I don't need evidence.
I have my feelings. Lol
IMO, one side can't communicate with the other because dems and never-Trumpers are authoritarians and never negotiate or compromise.To give an example why one side can't communicate with the other. Cognitive dissonance gets overused, but in some cases it is the answer.