Obama and the Dems should really be ashamed of themselves.
Why would they be ashamed? Do you really think they care what their servants think? Do you really think the "citizens" are in their best interests? This is nothing but a power struggle among elites.
Why would they be ashamed? Do you really think they care what their servants think? Do you really think the "citizens" are in their best interests? This is nothing but a power struggle among elites.
I will concede though, after deeper reflection that this is a shining example that there are two separate entities taking up the space of this country
You have the People of the United States and you have the United States Government.
The US government as is shown by what Obama has done here is separate from the American People, the public. For how could the government of the US deny access to public lands, which in no way jeopardizes the safety or security of the US, if those lands where indeed public and the members of government truly public servants.
This means they are not publicly owned they are owned by the government and the government is not a public institution because it is controlling the accessibility of this land and preventing the public's use. See?
A clear and distinct line is drawn between what is public and what is government.
Therefore, the people of the United States are being held as subjects to the United States Government.
I will concede though, after deeper reflection that this is a shining example that there are two separate entities taking up the space of this country
You have the People of the United States and you have the United States Government.
The US government as is shown by what Obama has done here is separate from the American People, the public. For how could the government of the US deny access to public lands, which in no way jeopardizes the safety or security of the US, if those lands where indeed public and the members of government truly public servants.
This means they are not publicly owned they are owned by the government and the government is not a public institution because it is controlling the accessibility of this land and preventing the public's use. See?
A clear and distinct line is drawn between what is public and what is government.
Therefore, the people of the United States are being held as subjects to the United States Government.
"Therefore, the people of the United States are being held as subjects to the United States Government." - you mean to say you didn't realize this before? You though that as a citizen you had the same rights and powers as the government? Try spying on the NSA and let me know how that works out
So, the government is shut down and in Obama's and the Dems rabid fury, they somehow find it logical to close the national parks which require maybe a handful of custodial staff, as it is just land that people walk on and look at the pretty monuments and other vistas.
In replacement of those few custodians, what do they do? They spend money, which they don't have, remember the government is shutdown, to place guards, fences, and various other barricades up keeping the American people, the PUBLIC off of public land..
Park Service Workers Erect WWII Barricade | The Weekly Standard
Obama and the Dems should really be ashamed of themselves.
They did shut down and it can be felt everywhere. For example, in Colorado, 8 roads and bridges have crumbled since the shutdown, killing hundreds.
Funny how you place no blame on the people who actually caused the shutdown.
The National Parks Service has around 22,000 employees, and around 220,000 volunteers. Keeping the parks closed requires a fraction of that staff.So, the government is shut down and in Obama's and the Dems rabid fury, they somehow find it logical to close the national parks which require maybe a handful of custodial staff....
Because the government, particularly the National Park Service, are stewards of the lands held in trust by the government, for the people.how could the government of the US deny access to public lands, which in no way jeopardizes the safety or security of the US, if those lands where indeed public and the members of government truly public servants.
The National Parks Service has around 22,000 employees, and around 220,000 volunteers. Keeping the parks closed requires a fraction of that staff.
Thanks for taking an entire department for granted. I'm sure that never happens.
Oh, and despite the shutdown, there are a small handful of government employees who are either being paid or are working anyway.
Because the government, particularly the National Park Service, are stewards of the lands held in trust by the government, for the people.
Sadly, left to their own devices, the public would wreck the national parks. At a minimum, the average person has no training in proper land management, and do not always consider how their actions can damage the often fragile ecosystems of those parks. The NPS provides critical guidance for public access to park lands.
The constituents of the park, by the way, are not just the people who are alive right now. It's also being protected for future generations.
Oh, and park management does not invert the relationship between the public and the government, any more than any other regulation or law. The public still has the rights to change the laws and/or the NPS as we see fit.
Funny how you place no blame on the people who actually caused the shutdown.
I did, see the part where I pointed out Obama and the dems?
The National Parks Service has around 22,000 employees, and around 220,000 volunteers. Keeping the parks closed requires a fraction of that staff.
Thanks for taking an entire department for granted. I'm sure that never happens.
Oh, and despite the shutdown, there are a small handful of government employees who are either being paid or are working anyway.
Because the government, particularly the National Park Service, are stewards of the lands held in trust by the government, for the people.
Sadly, left to their own devices, the public would wreck the national parks. At a minimum, the average person has no training in proper land management, and do not always consider how their actions can damage the often fragile ecosystems of those parks. The NPS provides critical guidance for public access to park lands.
The constituents of the park, by the way, are not just the people who are alive right now. It's also being protected for future generations.
Oh, and park management does not invert the relationship between the public and the government, any more than any other regulation or law. The public still has the rights to change the laws and/or the NPS as we see fit.
1) The critical jobs aren't handled by volunteers.If like you say tehre are 220,000 volunteers, then they can handle things until the governemtn is back up and running.
OKay... I'm willing to slow walk through this...
Please explain how Obama and the dems are responsible for shutting down the government. Should be an easy answer for you seeing how it's such an easy talking point.
i wonder if people are dropping dead in the streets again, as they did in the 95 shutdown?
and yes, the sky is falling...
i wonder if people are dropping dead in the streets again, as they did in the 95 shutdown?
So, the government is shut down and in Obama's and the Dems rabid fury, they somehow find it logical to close the national parks which require maybe a handful of custodial staff, as it is just land that people walk on and look at the pretty monuments and other vistas.
In replacement of those few custodians, what do they do? They spend money, which they don't have, remember the government is shutdown, to place guards, fences, and various other barricades up keeping the American people, the PUBLIC off of public land..
Park Service Workers Erect WWII Barricade | The Weekly Standard
Obama and the Dems should really be ashamed of themselves.
Obama should stop paying Congress just like Quinn did to the General Assembly in our dear state.
Maybe you think our National parks and monuments are not worth protecting but many would disagree. Why do you hate America?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?