- Joined
- May 19, 2009
- Messages
- 28,721
- Reaction score
- 6,738
- Location
- Redneck Riviera
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Moderate
I find that hard to believe. most of these kids came from housing projects that were so rough that the cops wouldn't go there except for enmasse. I had kids that would miss weeks of class because they were serving 30, 60 or 90 day jail terms. "where's tyrone? He's in jail, coach"
8 of my clients committed homicides. Had several dozen who committed aggravated assaults. About the same number who committed aggravated robberies. You don't do 90 days in jail for homicide. You do 90 days in jail for car theft or minor drug sales. Those are minor, non-violent offenses on the relative scale of the population I worked with.
My clients were all committed gang members who'd been gang-banging for years. Tattoos, weapons, drug sales, multiple assaults, drive-by shootings, etc. In my state, the average juvenile offender would be adjudicated for 30 misdemeanors and 7 felonies, ON AVERAGE, before doing a day in a secure facility.
My favorite client served 7 years in prison for being an accessory to a double murder (he guarded the door with a sawed off shotgun while his friend killed two people). He's now out of prison, and has a wife and a couple of kids. I still keep in touch with him. His friend will be in prison for at least the next 30 years. I worked with him, as well.
Just living in the projects doesn't make a kid a violent gang member. It makes them difficult, but it doesn't make them the kind of kids I worked with.
18, 19, 20 and 21 year olds are hardly "kids"
Anyone under 25 is a kid in my book. If you see it otherwise, that's part of the problem. When I say kid, I don't mean it in a demeaning way. I mean someone who is not fully developed as a person yet, and who can be redirected into a positive lifestyle because they are capable of change. A "kid" is someone who isn't quite an adult yet, emotionally, and who still needs adult guidance and mentoring.
Are there offenders who aren't capable of change? Yes. Absolutely. But, they tend to be older, more engrained in criminal conduct, and most have severe antisocial personality disorder.
The average inner city kid who is attending school at 21 is there because HE WANTS TO BE THERE. That means he has something to lose, and you have leverage. It also means that unless you really bollox things up with him, he's going to try not to screw up. If he didn't want to be there, he'd be off selling drugs on a corner somewhere or prowling cars for stereos.
I don't mean to be harsh, Oscar, but a lot of teachers aren't trained in behavior management, and do things that escalate conflicts in the classroom. Your negative experience has led you to write this population off as a group that is going to victimize anyone that serves them. That's not the case. I work prefessionally these days with people who do the same work I did, all over the U.S. Most of us have worked with an extremely rough population with nothing to lose--for YEARS--and almost none of us have been victimized by them. It happens, but it is EXTREMELY rare.
Last edited: