- Joined
- Oct 12, 2005
- Messages
- 281,619
- Reaction score
- 100,389
- Location
- Ohio
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Right
flying a plane over a parade and dropping bricks and not hitting anyone.508.060 Wanton endangerment in the first degree. (1) A ...
apps.legislature.ky.gov › law › statutes › statute
(1) A person is guilty of wanton endangerment in the first degree when, under circumstances manifesting extreme indifference to the value of human life, he.
where do you get off claiming it was MURDER?Except the police were wrong. They did break into her house and did murder her in her bed. It was her house and the suspect didn't live there. There really is no perfuming that pig.
The police didn't fire first. They returned fire. The boyfriend didn't identify his target and began indiscriminately shooting at cops. It lead to a shootout and an unfortunate death. If he had taken a second to find out what was going on instead of shooting at the first thing he saw, hopefully this situation would have ended without needless death.That's exactly what the cops did. What's your point? Are you going to justify breaking and entering next?
lots of you people need to brush up on what the term "Murder" means in terms of the lawThere is always something to prove. Nobody knows without proof whether an obvious murder was justified or not.
The police didn't fire first. They returned fire. The boyfriend didn't identify his target and began indiscriminately shooting at cops.
do you think the police who were not charged, were justified in returning fire after Sgt Mattingly was wounded.=?I don't hate cops but I probably would if I were Breonna Taylor and I was shot 5 times in my own house for no reason.
I don't support indescrimante firing of guns inside apartment buildings at targets someone has not identified. Imagine if instead of the cops it was just a confused neighbor who was at the wrong door? If castle doctrine allows people to shoot at police officers serving a warrant then I think that particular state law needs to be amended.Why don't you support the Castle Doctrine?
I don't support indescrimante firing of guns inside apartment buildings at targets someone has not identified. Imagine if instead of the cops it was just a confused neighbor who was at the wrong door? If castle doctrine allows people to shoot at police officers serving a warrant then I think that particular state law needs to be amended.
Lots of you people need to brush up on what the term "murder" means in terms of the law.
I don't know. I'd love to read the text of the law you're referring to before offering thoughts on it.So you think that Castle Doctrine has gone too far?
Nope, illegal pistol
I don't know. I'd love to read the text of the law you're referring to before offering thoughts on it.
You're not suggesting that the boyfriend should be charged for indiscriminately shooting at people he didn't identify inside of an apartment complex, are you?
Castle doctrine is not applicable here, so no.So you think that Castle Doctrine has gone too far?
The police didn't fire first. They returned fire. The boyfriend didn't identify his target and began indiscriminately shooting at cops. It lead to a shootout and an unfortunate death. If he had taken a second to find out what was going on instead of shooting at the first thing he saw, hopefully this situation would have ended without needless death.
don't ever sit for any bar exam/ You clearly haven't a clue what you are talking about.I know what the word murder means. If the cop chose to shoot Kenneth Walker, that was his choice. If he chose to shoot Breonna Taylor, that was his choice. So in order to not be murder, the police have to prove they had no way of knowing the person who opened fire was Walker, not Taylor.
Castle doctrine is not applicable here, so no.
It is difficult for me to determine if it is too much or not enough.Breonna Taylor shooting: Louisville officer indicted on criminal charges
One of three officers involved in the Louisville, Ky., drug operation that led to the police shooting death of Breonna Taylor in March 2020 was indicted Wednesday on criminal charges.www.foxnews.com
Too much? Not enough?
The officers were properly executing a lawful warrant.
Did he? I mean, yes, shooting at police officers does often put one's life in danger, I suppose. And create grave danger for the people in your immediate proximity. Probably best to not do that, if it can be avoided.This isn't rocket science. He had reason to believe that he and his girlfriend's life were in imminent danger. Which, it turned out, they were.
It's possible. Probably unlikely, but possible. Best to not shoot until one is sure of what they are shooting at, for sure.I don't believe for a second that the next door neighbors could hear them identifying as the police and the guy behind the door where they were shouting the police, didn't.
Did he? I mean, yes, shooting at police officers does often put one's life in danger, I suppose. And create grave danger for the people in your immediate proximity. Probably best to not do that, if it can be avoided.
I am one of the strong 2A supporters and I am always consistent.
One could call the police, I suppose. Retreat to a defensible area, barricade the door and call the police like a reasonable person, maybe. Got to be better options than shooting everyone who knocks on your door at night.Thanks for the useless piece of advice. Now how do you propose dealing with home invaders? And don't say "but they were cops," cause Kenneth did not know that at the time.
Is it possible he did not hear the cops identify themselves as police?
Why is it a fact when they claim something, but not when he does?
The next door neighbor could.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?