- Joined
- Feb 25, 2019
- Messages
- 59,945
- Reaction score
- 30,691
- Location
- Devonshire, England
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
Which part, with your factual rebuttal please-not just your opinion?Nah, that's a cold, hard lie.
Which part, with your factual rebuttal please-not just your opinion?Nah, that's a cold, hard lie.
Iranians now using MIRV warheads - take a look up
North Korea's been working on this tech for some time, and could have proliferated it to them. Anything's possible.
Whatcha gonna do about it?
Are you up for another right-wing coup in South Korea, to bring back military dictatorship there? (The last one fizzled when the citizenry revolted)
Because short of that, I don't see how you're going to suppress that axis.
The US (and others), have had MIRV nukes for decades.
![]()
Multiple independently targetable reentry vehicle - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Yeah…because power vacuums never leave space for even worse actors to step into that spaceLike what? If we render them incapable, what consequences do you foresee? Freedom at last for the Iranian people is a bad thing?
Yeah…we’ve seen that happen in so many places, right?The rest will work itself out
Yep.Once foreigners start bombing the shit out a country, the people have a tendency to forget how much they hate their leadership and realize how much they hate the foreigners bombing them
I would disagree somewhat. The CIA-led coup in 1953 which you mentioned; the installation of a hated pro-Washington dictator (the Shah), and the subsequent Islamic Revolution are all consequences of British and American greed for Iran's oil. Iran's leadership-and I suspect many of a certain generation-have no reason to trust the West. Yes, I agree the choice to attack the West and Israel was Iran's alone, but it wasn't conceived out of a vacuum, and was no more or less heinous than our illegal invasion of Iraq, for example.Iran's 'security' is a joke. I'm beginning to think that Iran was in no way prepared to fight an actual war with any of its major adversaries. It had the proxy thing down pretty well until Israeli intelligence infiltrated and then destroyed them.
I've been a harsh critical of Israel and remain so, and I will continue to be as long as they ignore international law. At the same time, I can't help but think that maybe Iran's regime has brought their destruction upon themselves. Nobody put a gun to their head and forced them to be arch enemies with Israel or the United States; that was their choice.
I know there's a rather unflattering history of outside powers manipulating ME states, including Iran, for their own access to resources (petroleum energy being the chief one), but I think compromises could have been made somewhere along the way, particularly when it comes to the rhetoric and stances regarding Israel's legitimacy coupled with the use of proxies to hit inside Israel.
I would disagree somewhat. The CIA-led coup in 1953 which you mentioned; the installation of a hated pro-Washington dictator (the Shah), and the subsequent Islamic Revolution are all consequences of British and American greed for Iran's oil. Iran's leadership-and I suspect many of a certain generation-have no reason to trust the West. Yes, I agree the choice to attack the West and Israel was Iran's alone, but it wasn't conceived out of a vacuum, and was no more or less heinous than our illegal invasion of Iraq, for example.
Yeah…because power vacuums never leave space for even worse actors to step into that space
Yeah…we’ve seen that happen in so many places, right?
Yep.
All the US getting involved in this war in any capacity other than helping defensively to protect Israeli citizens does is paint a larger target on the US for all the terrorists that seem to spring forth out of Iran.
Yep.Maybe to add a post-script to what I said, do I think that the bombings are putting pressure on Iran's regime? Absolutely. No question about it. Particularly as more and more of Iran's leadership gets picked off. Iran was caught completely off-guard and they're struggling to recover.
But even if Iran's de jure regime collapses, someone is going to have to fill that power vacuum or there's going to be chaos, which is going to introduce an entirely new set of problems for the region, as well as for Israel and US security.
Which is entirely different than what is being asserted here, which is that the government of Iran has collapsed.I gotta say, dude, you're whistling past the graveyard.
Iran got caught with their pants down. They are not going to recover in the near term.
They don’t look remotely interested in “unconditional surrender”, and definitely aren’t going to be giving up on the nuclear program after the US proved negotiations with it were pointless.Iran is out of the fight in any serious way. They simply weren't ready when the attack began.
And it looks very much like the F35 works as advertised.
Iranians now using MIRV warheads - take a look up
North Korea's been working on this tech for some time, and could have proliferated it to them. Anything's possible.
Whatcha gonna do about it?
Are you up for another right-wing coup in South Korea, to bring back military dictatorship there? (The last one fizzled when the citizenry revolted)
Because short of that, I don't see how you're going to suppress that axis
There is nothing in the mainstream news about this
Jeers:I want to know who jeers both.
Russia doesnt have the capability to fight a war on 2 fronts (Ukraine and Iran)Russia has a vested interest in BRICS, and will defend it. Iran is a member:
BRICS currently consists of ten member countries: Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, Indonesia, and the United Arab Emirates.
Should Trump escalate, it will pit Russia, India and China - three major powers - against the US - and will endanger US relations with the rest of BRICS, some of which are already shaky. Nobody likes a bully. Egypt's cooperation with us is paramount in the region, and risking it is irrational