I look forward to more vomit inducing gun control measures because of this.
Not sure why you're so disgusted by this.Feinstein calls for new gun control laws after shooting | The Daily Caller
Really no point in quoting the story, as you can guess it. People shot dead in DC, hours later this hack is already whining about needing more 'gun control.'
What a big steaming pile of poo she is. And all like her are as well.
Called it earlier today.
Gun grabbers are very predictable.
Look at it this way. She sees gun control as an actual answer to the problem of gun violence. Something that can actually reduce the numbers and make people safer. Now I'm sure you disagree with this, but given that she believes it, don't you think it's only proper for someone to advocate something that they believe in right after something like this?
Feinstein calls for new gun control laws after shooting | The Daily Caller
Really no point in quoting the story, as you can guess it. People shot dead in DC, hours later this hack is already whining about needing more 'gun control.'
What a big steaming pile of poo she is. And all like her are as well.
Not sure why you're so disgusted by this.
Look at it this way. She sees gun control as an actual answer to the problem of gun violence. Something that can actually reduce the numbers and make people safer. Now I'm sure you disagree with this, but given that she believes it, don't you think it's only proper for someone to advocate something that they believe in right after something like this?
If someone was killed by a bunch of drug mules smuggling in weed in to the country, and someone argued after that that we need to change our drug laws, I wouldn't see that as disgusting, or politicking. I see it as advancing what you believe is part of the solution.
If her idea is stupid, then of course criticize her for it, but give up on the "it's not the right time!" crap. It's a bull**** argument. Either defend your stance on it's merits or let it go.
1) She is just the kind of person that would rail about the 'other side' using the death of people for political gain.
2) She is a moron for her beliefs on guns and violence, and they have been nothing but disproven over and over.
Cons prefer their liberals quieter, less aggressive. They'll get up on their hind legs and applaud each other enthusiastically for jumping all over any liberal or progressive idea but just let someone lead off with something that they disagree with and they get all bucket-mouthed and pouty like a teenage girl who got felt up in the drive-in.
If she would then she's a huge hypocrite.
I agree. But I do see Roughdraft's point that if this is something you really believe would stop incidents like this shooting, then now is a good time to advocate for them, just as some on the other side are being critical of the policy against firearms on the base. It's a good time to learn from the mistakes and see where we can improve in the future.
Nothing she, or any other anti-gun person has put forth, would stop any future shooting. Period. Making legislation to 'feel good' or feel as if 'we have done something', is pointless, ignorant, and a waste of time.
Feinstein calls for new gun control laws after shooting | The Daily Caller
Really no point in quoting the story, as you can guess it. People shot dead in DC, hours later this hack is already whining about needing more 'gun control.'
What a big steaming pile of poo she is. And all like her are as well.
Oh look, partisan BS rather than on topic discussion. Shocker.
It's more than disgusting to use the dead as political props, there is a special place in hell for her and those that would try to use tragedy to advance something against us.I'm definitely against any legislation she's likely to propose, I just am not against people honestly trying to come up with solutions to situations like this shooting. I have many problems with her legislation, but I don't have anything wrong with her proposing it right now.
Not sure why you're so disgusted by this.
Look at it this way. She sees gun control as an actual answer to the problem of gun violence. Something that can actually reduce the numbers and make people safer. Now I'm sure you disagree with this, but given that she believes it, don't you think it's only proper for someone to advocate something that they believe in right after something like this?
If someone was killed by a bunch of drug mules smuggling in weed in to the country, and someone argued after that that we need to change our drug laws, I wouldn't see that as disgusting, or politicking. I see it as advancing what you believe is part of the solution.
If her idea is stupid, then of course criticize her for it, but give up on the "it's not the right time!" crap. It's a bull**** argument. Either defend your stance on it's merits or let it go.
I'm good with her shutting it permanently and going into retirement.The point of the OP was that her timing was horrible. She has an opinion. Great... but she should shut her big fat blow hole right now. It's not the right time.
It's more than disgusting to use the dead as political props, there is a special place in hell for her and those that would try to use tragedy to advance something against us.
I'm definitely against any legislation she's likely to propose, I just am not against people honestly trying to come up with solutions to situations like this shooting. I have many problems with her legislation, but I don't have anything wrong with her proposing it right now.
Feinstein calls for new gun control laws after shooting | The Daily Caller
Really no point in quoting the story, as you can guess it. People shot dead in DC, hours later this hack is already whining about needing more 'gun control.'
What a big steaming pile of poo she is. And all like her are as well.
Fans of irony, take note.
Fair enough, however the rhetoric looks like pre fabricated talking points to me, and these anti-gunners could have the decency to wait, look at information, and then form a coherent plan based upon what they believe. If these "solutions" were truly based on what happened they wouldn't look exactly like the "solutions" that have been postured since the Brady group was formed.If she's just using it to score a political point then I absolutely agree. If she's advancing because she sincerely believes that this legislation will limit situations like this one, then I completely disagree with her ideas, but I don't have any problem with her promoting them. I think its reasonable to discuss what could be done differently in the future, just like when you criticized the policy of not allowing guns in your first post. It's what we should be doing after a tragedy like this.
The only predictable thing is the boomsticklovers immediately defended their extremist views of guns against the obvious need of gun control.
Feinstein calls for new gun control laws after shooting | The Daily Caller
Really no point in quoting the story, as you can guess it. People shot dead in DC, hours later this hack is already whining about needing more 'gun control.'
What a big steaming pile of poo she is. And all like her are as well.
Let's see, I started the thread, I am discussing the topic, you are not discussing the topic. Yep, you fail. Do you have any comments on the actual topic, or just more off topic trolling?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?