There’s at least 4 or 5 levels of managers between Musk and the guys actually doing the designing and building of rockets or electric cars.
If you want to say “Elon Musk manages a company that builds rockets”, I won’t argue the point. Saying he builds rockets is just falling for his PR propaganda.
Wrong again. The man was stupid because he made a stupid statement about claiming there was no life on other planets. For you to even defend such silliness means you also have no argument.Confirmed him stupid? Because, he doesn't have a.................. nobel?
Just like Richard Dawkins!
Do you have one? A nobel, I mean.
Lol - don't put your foot in your mouth POS, by calling this man, stupid.
Look at his awards for one thing - not to mention his position.
If such a man, in your view, is stupid - I'd hate to imagine what you think of us............. or, even ............yourself.
Unless, you have a nobel tucked under your belt, of course.
Good lord! Why cant it just be an exploration to find new life somewhere else? How cool would that be? How is it any different from the early biologists here on Earth, looking for new life? So exciting, so much to learn from it.Study nixes Mars life in meteorite found in Antarctica
Updated: Jan. 13, 2022, 8:41 p.m. | Published: Jan. 13, 2022, 8:41 p.m.
I can still remember the presidential press conference concerning this meteorite in 1996 when the opening remarks from the president in which he immediately took a swipe at God/people of faith on the false premise fed to him that life had been found, made me realize that the primary, not secondary, purpose of this ongoing quest of religious faith based on nothing, to find life, somewhere, anywhere other than earth is to debunk the idea of a God involved in human affairs.
To scientifically establish based on mere faith, and nothing more, where we did not come from , and where we are not going
With a desperate urgency no less that the president well exemplified that day, causing believers in this outer space faith to be ultimately befuddled over and over again.
A religious faith entirely taxpayer funded by the way.
" Well, it seems that God did not tell us everything " ( President Bill Clinton meteorite press conference 1996)
Several steps removed. If you want to say “Elon Musk leads a company that build rockets”, I won’t argue the point.
Why do you think the President of the United States felt obligated to invoke the name of God in the first sentence of His press conference where he had been deluded into believing life had been discovered ?Good lord! Why cant it just be an exploration to find new life somewhere else? How cool would that be? How is it any different from the early biologists here on Earth, looking for new life? So exciting, so much to learn from it.
Are you or the OP source claiming that the only reason we're doing space exploration is to disprove God or that He only created life on our planet?
Wrong again. The man was stupid because he made a stupid statement about claiming there was no life on other planets. For you to even defend such silliness means you also have no argument.
Why do you think the President of the United States felt obligated to invoke the name of God in the first sentence of His press conference where he had been deluded into believing life had been discovered ?
" Well, it seems that God did not tell us everything " ( President Bill Clinton meteorite press conference 1996)
What question do you have that President Clinton did not address in his remarks?Please answer my questions first before asking more of your own.
Why are you asking more questions? You already quoted my questions and ignored them. Here they are again:What question do you have that President Clinton did not address in his remarks?
" Well, it seems that God did not tell us everything " ( President Bill Clinton meteorite press conference 1996)
Because the discrediting of God is a top priority for very powerful Atheist world leader in charge of underwriting the venture.Why are you asking more questions? You already quoted my questions and ignored them. Here they are again:
Good lord! Why cant it just be an exploration to find new life somewhere else?
Source this (bold orange) please. The tongue-in-cheek comment from Clinton is no such thing.Because the discrediting of God is a top priority for very powerful Atheist world leader in charge of underwriting the venture.
It's the bigger thing.
Take the president's own words for "Why cant it just be an exploration to find new life somewhere else?
" Well, it seems that God did not tell us everything " ( President Bill Clinton meteorite press conference 1996)
Why do you think the President of the United States felt obligated to invoke the name of God in the first sentence of His press conference where he had been deluded into believing life had been discovered ?
" Well, it seems that God did not tell us everything " ( President Bill Clinton meteorite press conference 1996)
Of course. Tesla is a 1T market valuation and he's a 20% shareholder.
Modern capitalism began in the early 1800's. And at about that time, 95% of the world's population lived in extreme poverty. Assuming you don't live in extreme poverty, hang low, now would be a good time to pay gratitude to a "capital controller"."Capitalists don't create value, they control capital"
Indeed. Neil deGrasse Tyson once said the most common elements in the universe are hydrogen [the most common element in the universe], helium, oxygen, nitrogen, and carbon, among others. The human body is composed mostly of hydrogen and oxygen. We are composed of the most basic elements of the universe. The laws of physics, chemistry, ect. remains the same throughout the universe. So it's likely that life (as we understand it) has formed elsewhere from the same elements. The hard part is finding it.It isn’t impossible. Because we know life developed on Earth and the chemical processes behind that development aren’t rare.
Are you suggesting that exolife cannot develop or evolve naturally on its own elsewhere in the universe?Personally, I'm of the opinion that the only biological life to be found anywhere else in the Universe will be the life we send or take with us there.
There's a difference between life originating and life evolving. Evolution requires environmental influences.People who believe that life originated "naturally" HAVE to feel there is biological life elsewhere that EVOLVED.
That can only be possible if the entire universe is thoroughly searched without finding even a trace of life.If none is found, they are under the extreme burden to accept that something miraculous/supernatural happened right here
Except god isn't an explanation. It's a failure to explain.----and that GOD is the ONLY possible/logical answer. Just making a poignant observation.
Even extremely conservative numbers plugged into the Drake Equation make it a guarantee there is life on other planets.
The universe is a very ****ing big place. Just because Mars can’t support life, that means nothing.
I would say it's likely, given enough time and technological advancement.The belief that were going to FIND some is pretty optimistic,
Indeed. Looking is half the fun and excitement.but there's no reason to not look.
The belief that were going to FIND some is pretty optimistic, but there's no reason to not look.
I would say it's likely, given enough time and technological advancement.
Like I said, time and technology. Our ability to explore the universe is still relatively very limited. And it's a big universe.I'm probably simply less optimistic about how much of the universe as explained in the drake equation that we will ever have access to.
I never claimed we’ll find any aliens. I’m extremely doubtful any kind of cohesive interstellar civilization could exist.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?