• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Bastardizing Words : "The Truth"

Arlette said:
There are no scientific studies on things that don't exist
Click to expand...
You missed the point. He made a claim that he can't back up.

You guys don't get a free pass with half-backed claims.
 
Logicman said:
You missed the point. He made a claim that he can't back up.

You guys don't get a free pass with half-backed claims.
Click to expand...

No, you missed the point. You are asking for something that is ridiculous. Science doesn't do studies on imaginary things. Do theologists use their studies to come up with how to create rocket ships? Tell us one imaginary thing that science studied in order to prove it was imaginary. Just one. If you can't, stop shifting the burden of proof.
 
Last edited:
Logicman said:
You missed the point. He made a claim that he can't back up.

You guys don't get a free pass with half-backed claims.
Click to expand...
You asked for scientific studies on supernatural stuff. Dude !!!!!!!
 
Arlette said:
You asked for scientific studies on supernatural stuff. Dude !!!!!!!
Click to expand...
What's the basis for his claim that the resurrection of Jesus was impossible? It wasn't scientific studies, we know that. Just wanted to drill that into his head.

So what's the basis, Arlette?
 
Logicman said:
What's the basis for his claim that the resurrection of Jesus was impossible? It wasn't scientific studies, we know that. Just wanted to drill that into his head.

So what's the basis, Arlette?
Click to expand...
Common sense?
 
tosca1 said:
No.
If every single person with religious faith believes theirs is "the truth", that means, they can't all be the truth. It doesn't eliminate THE TRUTH.
Just because you can't prove who's wrong, doesn't eliminate THE TRUTH, either.

It just means you can't prove it.
And we can REASONABLY ask you......................... why can't you?

There can be all sorts of reasons as to why you can't prove it.
For all we know................... the problem lies with you.
Click to expand...

But all religious people seem very confident they have it. They all have equal strength of faith. So how does one know they have achieved the ULTIMATE truth?

Because, in other things in life, from personal issues to science, "truth" is always contingent only on our latest, best observations and the most clever models yet we can bring to bear on those observations. There is no way we can know any of that is "ultimately true".
 
Logicman said:
What's the basis for his claim that the resurrection of Jesus was impossible? It wasn't scientific studies, we know that. Just wanted to drill that into his head.

So what's the basis, Arlette?
Click to expand...

The basis is physical reality. Once again, science doesn't study imaginary things like resurrections. How would science study it?
 
Logicman said:
You make dozens of bs claims every day. That's yet another steaming pile. We did a one year Old Testament survey, going through the entire OT book by book. So I'm quite familiar with OT theology.

It's YOU and your gang of dilettante novices who are embarrassing yourselves with your kindergarten bs.
Click to expand...
So let me ask you this, did you do your year long study using the King James version of the bible or did you do the study use the Hebrew script? Do you understand the Hebrew language and all of its nuances in the meaning of the Hebrew words? If the answer is no, then all you have done is to put your Christian stance on a Hebrew text.
 
Dragonfly said:
The absolute and definitive arrogance of taking a word like "truth", and bastardizing it to the point of being a passive-aggressive insult ...
Click to expand...

You mean calling someone who demands accurate data on the distributions of steel and concrete down a 1360 ft skyscraper a Truther is an insult?

ROFLMBAO
 
psikeyhackr said:
You mean calling someone who demands accurate data on the distributions of steel and concrete down a 1360 ft skyscraper a Truther is an insult?

ROFLMBAO
Click to expand...

Funny thing is the offenders just need to change one word and this all goes away.

Instead of saying "the truth" all they need to do is say "my truth".

Problem solved.
 
Dragonfly said:
Funny thing is the offenders just need to change one word and this all goes away.

Instead of saying "the truth" all they need to do is say "my truth".

Problem solved.
Click to expand...

But they won't, because they are too afraid to.
 
Anyone who comes at you with "the truth" is probably a child molester. That's "the truth" they can't get out. I learned this from Kurt Vonnegut in "God Bless you, Mr. Rosewater". Turns out Vonnegut was right.

Look, you know Truthers have tremendous personal problems, right? You know being a complete disaster is what drives them to special status via conspiracy theory. They are, in fact, trying to tell you something.

If someone tells you, "you just don't know about the truth!" You do not want to know "the truth". You really don't.
 
Last edited:
ecofarm said:
Anyone who comes at you with "the truth" is probably a child molester. That's "the truth" they can't get out. I learned this from Kurt Vonnegut in "God Bless you, Mr. Rosewater". Turns out Vonnegut was right.

Look, you know Truthers have tremendous personal problems, right? You know being a complete disaster is what drives them to special status via conspiracy theory. They are, in fact, trying to tell you something.

If someone tells you, "you just don't know about the truth!" You do not want to know "the truth". You really don't.
Click to expand...

That is quite the outrageous, hyperbolic claim. You just asserted that some posters in this very sub-forum are probably child molesters. My advice to you is to ignore writers of fiction, and focus on reality. But now it is too late to delete your post as I have quoted it for posterity.
 
devildavid said:
That is quite the outrageous, hyperbolic claim. You just asserted that some posters in this very sub-forum are probably child molesters. My advice to you is to ignore writers of fiction, and focus on reality. But now it is too late to delete your post as I have quoted it for posterity.
Click to expand...

I do what I want. I believe what I said. **** scumbags pushing "the truth", they're pedos.

And I'll tell you something else. Anyone who doesn't believe there are pedos at an internet debate website is a stupid piece of shit.
 
ecofarm said:
I do what I want. I believe what I said. **** scumbags pushing "the truth", they're pedos.

And I'll tell you something else. Anyone who doesn't believe there are pedos at an internet debate website is a stupid piece of shit.
Click to expand...

You are off the rails on this one.
 
devildavid said:
Don't worry, I'm too busy laughing.
Click to expand...

You're all "how dare you! I've saved it! You can't deny it now!"

And then "I was laughing."

Please. People have greater attention spans than fish. Your lie is stupid.
 
ecofarm said:
You're all "how dare you! I've saved it! You can't deny it now!"

And then "I was laughing."

Please. People have greater attention spans than fish. Your lie is stupid.
Click to expand...

Did you catch what you were looking for?
 
Terryj said:
Do you have a source for that statement, or are you speaking from experience?
Click to expand...

Oregon is the white supremacist capital of the US.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom