black_squirrel
New member
- Joined
- Sep 8, 2013
- Messages
- 41
- Reaction score
- 5
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Mostly criminal on criminal, very few actual victimizations, and many of those are people who knew the murderer.In the USA, 12,000 people are murdered every year with firearms.
You can't prevent a murder unless you personally are willing to meet that force with counter force, no law will ever convince a person intent on murder from abstaining from the act.A lot of these murders can be prevented.
Gun laws in the U.S. not based upon due process are unconstitutional. Period.Gun laws in the USA have loopholes.
So what. If I want to sell private property it's a right, if I want to sell business property as a firearms dealer it can be regulated under business law. No issue here. No matter how many people repeat it.Background checks are not required for ALL firearm sales
They can get them from the same people they buy other black market items too, what's your point?For example they
often not apply to private sales. So criminals can easily obtain guns from a private seller.
State's have more rights than the federal, that's how it is supposed to work.Moreover, gun laws
differ from state to state, which does not make sense. Strict laws for selling guns won't do much good if a
neighboring state has very lax gun laws.
Nope.To remedy this, it makes sense to
1. register ALL firearms
Nope2. subject ALL sales to background checks
Nope3. require ALL stolen guns to be reported
Not true. Some may have been stolen, others may have come from ports and smuggled in past customs, like drugs, the porous borders also are an avenue.Most of the guns that are illegally possessed were once owned legally by someone.
Not even close to correct, criminals have tons of options. The whole point which should be obvious to anyone keeping an open mind is that criminals BY NATURE do not follow laws.If law-abiding citizens
only sell guns to other people who can legally posses a gun, then criminals would have more difficulties
obtaining a gun. Any person who owns a gun legally, would think twice about selling a gun without a background check
would think twice because this gun could be tracked down to the him/her.
Except it's all recycled nonsense from gun control groups and completely false. Other than that I'm sure it's fine. :roll:I don't see anything wrong with that. :thumbs:
I forgot the actual numbers but just about every communist revolution last century cost the citizenry of those countries millions, China, Cambodia, the USSR, South American instability, Africa, even under established takeovers, the genocides of Africa, the Holocaust, etc. The sad thing is the lucky ones were shot, many more were starved intentionally, gassed, or otherwise murdered in slow and painful manners...........all by some form of organized government structure.More wet dream liberalitus. One thinking only the govt can save them.
12,000 people die due to gun violence in America - yes.
263,000,000 were killed by governments in the last 113 years alone.
DO THE MATH
In the USA, 12,000 people are murdered every year with firearms. A lot of these murders can be prevented.
Gun laws in the USA have loopholes. Background checks are not required for ALL firearm sales. For example they
often not apply to private sales. So criminals can easily obtain guns from a private seller. Moreover, gun laws
differ from state to state, which does not make sense. Strict laws for selling guns won't do much good if a
neighboring state has very lax gun laws.
To remedy this, it makes sense to
1. register ALL firearms
2. subject ALL sales to background checks
3. require ALL stolen guns to be reported
Most of the guns that are illegally possessed were once owned legally by someone. If law-abiding citizens
only sell guns to other people who can legally posses a gun, then criminals would have more difficulties
obtaining a gun. Any person who owns a gun legally, would think twice about selling a gun without a background check
would think twice because this gun could be tracked down to the him/her.
What happens when you sell your private property (Gun) to a person that has a record and is not supposed to have a gun by law?...So what. If I want to sell private property it's a right,...
In the USA, 12,000 people are murdered every year with firearms. A lot of these murders can be prevented.
Gun laws in the USA have loopholes. Background checks are not required for ALL firearm sales. For example they
often not apply to private sales. So criminals can easily obtain guns from a private seller. Moreover, gun laws
differ from state to state, which does not make sense. Strict laws for selling guns won't do much good if a
neighboring state has very lax gun laws.
To remedy this, it makes sense to
1. register ALL firearms
2. subject ALL sales to background checks
3. require ALL stolen guns to be reported
Most of the guns that are illegally possessed were once owned legally by someone. If law-abiding citizens
only sell guns to other people who can legally posses a gun, then criminals would have more difficulties
obtaining a gun. Any person who owns a gun legally, would think twice about selling a gun without a background check
would think twice because this gun could be tracked down to the him/her.
They get caught with it and they get a felony charge, I'm only liable if I KNOW they are prohibited or buying for a criminal action.What happens when you sell your private property (Gun) to a person that has a record and is not supposed to have a gun by law?
In the USA, 12,000 people are murdered every year with firearms. A lot of these murders can be prevented.
Gun laws in the USA have loopholes. Background checks are not required for ALL firearm sales. For example they
often not apply to private sales. So criminals can easily obtain guns from a private seller. Moreover, gun laws
differ from state to state, which does not make sense. Strict laws for selling guns won't do much good if a
neighboring state has very lax gun laws.
To remedy this, it makes sense to
1. register ALL firearms
2. subject ALL sales to background checks
3. require ALL stolen guns to be reported
Most of the guns that are illegally possessed were once owned legally by someone. If law-abiding citizens
only sell guns to other people who can legally posses a gun, then criminals would have more difficulties
obtaining a gun. Any person who owns a gun legally, would think twice about selling a gun without a background check
would think twice because this gun could be tracked down to the him/her.
I don't see anything wrong with that. :thumbs:
What happens when you sell your private property (Gun) to a person that has a record and is not supposed to have a gun by law?
I don't see anything wrong with that. :thumbs:
Oh no! Take me out of your database.of course not-you are on record as a gun banner
Oh no! Take me out of your database.:2razz:
Take note of the word regulated that's in that sentence.Now you do:
A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.
Take note of the word regulated that's in that sentence.
If you think that registration is OK that means you support gun confiscation because the only reason for registration is confiscation.
So that wouldn't bother you if you sold a gun to a person that had committed a felony and harmed or kill someone with that gun?He gets prosecuted for possession while under a prohibition
TD: Our forefathers seen the people as the militia. As a matter of fact I believe that Thomas Jefferson actually frowned on a militia that would be formed by the Federal government.take note of the word regulated referencing the militia, not the rights of the people
take note that as used in the second amendment well regulated had nothing to do with federal control or the delegation of power to the federal government
take note of the fact that we have seen silly anti gun arguments for years and its doubtful you gun banners can come up with some novel argument we haven't flushed down the toilet before
Take note of the word regulated that's in that sentence.
Our forefathers meant that the people were the militia.Take note that well regulated applied to the militia, not the to the people. The 2A did not use militia in one place and people in another in that sentence by accident, as they are not interchangable.
1) That is in the subordinate clause, the only reading of that came from the anti constitution asshole Woodrow Wilson and has been adopted by the progressives and gun control groups ever since.Take note of the word regulated that's in that sentence.
Funniest post of the day.
Yeah - and spanking your kids a few times on the butt is the same thing as child abuse because the only reason for laying your hands on a kid is to physically and mentally scar them. :doh
This is really rich. How do you come up with such nonsense without breaking into laughter? :roll:
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?