Amazing how pro-illegals try to say SB 1070 allows for racial profiling even though it is nowhere to be found in SB 1070. I would think that since the bill is less that 20 pages long it is would be very easy for pro-illegals to highlight, copy and paste on a political forum the part of the bill that allows for racial profiling if it actually did allow for racial profiling. I guess thats why Obama is suing for supremacy clause and not racial profiling because he such claims of racial profiling are unsubstantiated.
I think its great how I can put my nose to a bill, raise a technicality and deny the reality that the bill could only result in racial profiling to effectively address the issue for which the bill was written.
I think its great how I can put my nose to a bill, raise a technicality and deny the reality that the bill could only result in racial profiling to effectively address the issue for which the bill was written.
Then please show where in the bill it allows for racial profiling.The bill is less than 2o pages long
When did I ever say it was written into the bill?
How does an officer identify a suspected illegal immigrant in a state bordering mexico?
Do you deny that this law was written to detain illegal immigrants?
Do you deny that the vast majority of them are going to be mexican?
How is this going to be effectively done without profiling?
Is this law designed to be ineffective?
Do you expect officers will be 'suspecting' fluent english speaking white people of being illegal immigrants and then asking for their papers?
The response has been written in threads many times that the ambiguity in how a person becomes a 'suspected' illegal is sufficient enough to allow for the bill to result in racial profiling.
This is about as non-racist as a bill forbidding picnics with watermelons and fried chicken and grape soda. That wouldn't be racist at all. :roll:
Or is it that its just going to be an ineffective bill y'all support for the message it sends?
Dont many illegals have drivers licenses?
Nope...thats not it all. First off...you cant possibly know...second off...unless your ass is in Arizona it has no impact on YOU, third off...the 'message' is the same MESSAGE the FEDERAL INS laws is supposed to be sending. the MESSAGE is NOT we hate mezcans...it is NO ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION. The left is the one pretending its a hateful 'message'. Foruth...its STILL leftist excuses bull****. The FEDERAL GOVERNMENT is SUPPSOED to be doing what Az is doing. the FEDERAL GOVERNMENT spent millions of dollars training states to DO this very thing.
Nope...not even a little bit buying it. And if we were face to face I'm betting you couldnt even say that with a straight face.
Answer my question, college student.
When did I ever say it was written into the bill?
How does an officer identify a suspected illegal immigrant in a state bordering mexico?
Do you deny that this law was written to detain illegal immigrants?
Do you deny that the vast majority of them are going to be mexican?
How is this going to be effectively done without profiling?
Is this law designed to be ineffective?
Do you expect officers will be 'suspecting' fluent english speaking white people of being illegal immigrants and then asking for their papers?
The response has been written in threads many times that the ambiguity in how a person becomes a 'suspected' illegal is sufficient enough to allow for the bill to result in racial profiling.
This is about as non-racist as a bill forbidding picnics with watermelons and fried chicken and grape soda. That wouldn't be racist at all. :roll:
Why wouldnt I enforce immigration laws if I were the federal government.
Answer my question,... uh.... you?
Bbak at 8:30 eastern time.
I'll qualify that as a disgruntled rant. Next.
If that makes you feel better...qualify it as you like. It doesnt change the fact that every negative argument against the Az law since it was announced is absolutely mindless leftist BULL****.
Maybe they are trying to cover Obamas butt. He's the one who said the law would allow for you to be stopped if you were just taking your kids out for ice cream.
They all kneejerk jumped on this without even READING it. The fact is the democrats NEED these folk to stay in power. They need the poor hispanic vote...they need to dangle the carrot of citizenship if for no other reason than to blame the evil republicans for not making them citizens. Its politics. its ALL it has EVER been.
I still mainain Arizona should shut the power switch off to California and 'honor their boycott, and then countersue the federal government for failure to enfirce federal laws.
When did I ever say it was written into the bill?
How does an officer identify a suspected illegal immigrant in a state bordering mexico?
Do you deny that this law was written to detain illegal immigrants?
Do you deny that the vast majority of them are going to be mexican?
1.The officer can simply check the legal status of everyone they pull over.How is this going to be effectively done without profiling?
Is this law designed to be ineffective?
I would suspect that they wouldn't be suspecting fluent english speakers of any race period.Do you expect officers will be 'suspecting' fluent english speaking white people of being illegal immigrants and then asking for their papers?
No mostly it is wah I do not like Arizona's anti-illegal immigration law so I am going to lie and says it allows for racial profiling since no one can prove the bill is racist or allows for racial profiling.The response has been written in threads many times that the ambiguity in how a person becomes a 'suspected' illegal is sufficient enough to allow for the bill to result in racial profiling.
Seeing how anyone of any race can be illegal if they are in the country illegally and this bill targets illegals and those who hire illegals I fail to see how this bill is racist. Besides that People regardless of race love fried chicken, watermelon and grape soda.This is about as non-racist as a bill forbidding picnics with watermelons and fried chicken and grape soda. That wouldn't be racist at all. :roll:
When most pro-illegals say SB 1070 is racist or allows for racial profiling then would think that somewhere in that bill allows for racial profiling or is racist.
The response has been written in threads many times that the ambiguity in how a person becomes a 'suspected' illegal is sufficient enough to allow for the bill to result in racial profiling.
No mostly it is wah I do not like Arizona's anti-illegal immigration law so I am going to lie and says it allows for racial profiling since no one can prove the bill is racist or allows for racial profiling.
The only way this bill would be ineffective is if Obama, McCain, Kennedy or Bush wrote this law?
The fact most illegals are Mexican does not make the bill racist just because the bill targets illegals.