Sixty-one percent of Americans polled would rather see taxes for the wealthy increased as a first step to tackling the deficit, the poll showed.
On taxes, the poll reported that roughly two out of three registered voters — 64 percent — would be in favor of increasing taxes on annual income over $250,000.
Fully 72 percent of Americans supported raising taxes on those with incomes over $250,000 in the July Post-ABC survey.
Nationally, support for upper income tax hikes is much higher among Democrats (87 percent) and independents (73 percent) than among Republicans (54 percent).
According to a CNN/ORC International Poll conducted last month, 63 percent of the public said they were OK with any deficit reduction bill passed by Congress that included increased taxes on higher-income Americans and businesses, with 36 percent opposed to the idea.
I'm not for soaking the rich. I'm not for taxing the @#$% out of them. However, I have a big problem with GE paying no taxes and getting corporate welfare to boot. I have a problem with hedge fund managers paying a lower tax percentage than working class Americans. That makes ZERO sense. I wouldn't tax them to death, but I would let the Bush tax cuts expire and close up loopholes.
If a plumber pays 35% in Federal taxes, I don't find it absurd at all to ask a millionaire hedge fund manager to pay that same percent. That's not hating the wealthy. That's just being fair.
Should taxes be raised on the rich?
If you only watched Fox News or listened to / read any conservative talking points, you'd probably think 75 percent of Americans are Tea Party activists who oppose all tax increases.
Now if you lived in the real world you'd know that for a long time now the majority of Americans have been in favor of raising taxes on the rich. Poll after poll after poll has been showing this, yet the Republicans continue to try to put this "class warfare" idea on the backs of Obama and the Democrats. All while claiming they have the majority on their side.
The Republicans may have some fooled, but not me...
January, 2011: Most Americans say tax rich to balance budget: poll | Reuters
April, 2011: Poll: Raise taxes on wealthy, leave Medicare, Medicaid alone - The Hill's On The Money
Sept, 2011 (Poll done in July, 2011): Obama deficit cuts popular in polls - Behind the Numbers - The Washington Post
Sept, 2011: Should taxes on millionaires be boosted? – CNN Political Ticker - CNN.com Blogs
Of course you can disagree with the idea that we should raise taxes on the rich... but you cannot claim that you have the majority on your side.
I'm not for soaking the rich. I'm not for taxing the @#$% out of them. However, I have a big problem with GE paying no taxes and getting corporate welfare to boot. I have a problem with hedge fund managers paying a lower tax percentage than working class Americans. That makes ZERO sense. I wouldn't tax them to death, but I would let the Bush tax cuts expire and close up loopholes.
If a plumber pays 35% in Federal taxes, I don't find it absurd at all to ask a millionaire hedge fund manager to pay that same percent. That's not hating the wealthy. That's just being fair.
when you rob a few to pander to the many you will have the many on your side
another reason why the progressive income tax is good politics but evil
one day atlas will shrug and all the teat suckers are gonna wonder where the milk went
when you rob a few to pander to the many you will have the many on your side
another reason why the progressive income tax is good politics but evil
one day atlas will shrug and all the teat suckers are gonna wonder where the milk went
I'm entirely in favor of everyone, rich and otherwise paying an equal percentage of their income. I am not in favor of soaking the rich and asking them to pay 50%+ of their income so others can pay less.
I don't know anyone who is asking them to pay 50% or higher. I'd be asking for closer to 38 to 40%.
And let me ask you something, do you think you could support your family if you could only get a job that pays less than $20,000 a year, and then have to pay 20%+ of that to the government? I object to putting someone who already is in poverty that much further bellow the poverty line.
You have to remember under Eisenhower, the rich paid 90% and lots of people want to put it right back there.
Anyone who is only earning $20k and has a family to support is an idiot.
Thank you for the history lesson... I am well aware. I still know no one who wants to go back to those numbers. And I can assure you any such opinion is held by few people.
I suggest you go volunteer at a food shelter to gain a little humility.
I'm entirely in favor of everyone, rich and otherwise paying an equal percentage of their income. I am not in favor of soaking the rich and asking them to pay 50%+ of their income so others can pay less.
How does your opinion account for most of our debt being approved by Republican presidents?
Thats understandable, but there's no reason why the rich can't pay a little bit more than everyone else.
I suggest you go volunteer at a food shelter to gain a little humility.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?