• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Apes descended from Humans – NOT the other way around.

ptif219 said:
They gave opinions as to the articles. The articles explain how peer review is broken as I claim. Opinions are not proof
Click to expand...
Then by the same token, your stated opinion that the articles prove your position regarding peer review is not proof either.

Because that, also, is only your opinion.


-----

So far, you've posted articles but not explained how those articles prove your position - others have looked at those same articles and seen no proof - what should we do, simply change our entire perception of reality?

I read those articles, and I saw nothing that supported your position.


But I must allow for the possibility that I either missed something, or misinterpreted something.

So, if you could point out the specific parts of those articles that support your position, it would perhaps help me to understand your position.
 
ptif219 said:
No but because of over a million trucks
Click to expand...
A million or so trucks, yes, but your single truck alone does not significantly change matters.
 
ptif219 said:
You have nothing I take it to show my sources wrong
Click to expand...

It has been proven, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that you do not have the capabilities necessary to fully understand the sources you present. Therefore, any discussion about those links would be hobbled due to your lack of understanding.
 
The Mark said:
Then by the same token, your stated opinion that the articles prove your position regarding peer review is not proof either.

Because that, also, is only your opinion.


-----

So far, you've posted articles but not explained how those articles prove your position - others have looked at those same articles and seen no proof - what should we do, simply change our entire perception of reality?

I read those articles, and I saw nothing that supported your position.


But I must allow for the possibility that I either missed something, or misinterpreted something.

So, if you could point out the specific parts of those articles that support your position, it would perhaps help me to understand your position.
Click to expand...

If you did not see how they said peer review is broken then you did not read them
 
Tucker Case said:
It has been proven, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that you do not have the capabilities necessary to fully understand the sources you present. Therefore, any discussion about those links would be hobbled due to your lack of understanding.
Click to expand...

In your mind maybe. I see no proof of that
 
ptif219 said:
If you did not see how they said peer review is broken then you did not read them
Click to expand...
I read at least 2 that you had linked regarding your peer review opinion.
 
We really should get a Mod in here to flush this toilet down the drain.
 
ptif219 said:
Name one thing you buy that is not delivered by a truck. Example. I pick up trailers from the rail yard and take them to the terminal. Products on store shelves got there by a truck.
Click to expand...

It is an important job that you do, no question about it. Whenever I see one of those huge machines on the highway, I really don't care whether the driver understands the basics of science or not. All I care about is that the truck is firmly under his/her control, and that he is not suicidal. There are plenty of scary and sometimes suicidal people driving cars, but they can't begin to do the damage a truck could, yet truck accidents are relatively rare.

While I salute your vocation, I still don't believe what you post.

Nor do I really care.
 
Tucker Case said:
Where did you get the idea that you would be capable of accurately analyzing proof of anything?
Click to expand...

Of course no one can except you on the left.
MG_12.gif
 
Dittohead not! said:
It is an important job that you do, no question about it. Whenever I see one of those huge machines on the highway, I really don't care whether the driver understands the basics of science or not. All I care about is that the truck is firmly under his/her control, and that he is not suicidal. There are plenty of scary and sometimes suicidal people driving cars, but they can't begin to do the damage a truck could, yet truck accidents are relatively rare.

While I salute your vocation, I still don't believe what you post.

Nor do I really care.
Click to expand...

Truck drivers learn to look ahead several cars to avoid bad situations. I have been through the smith program
 
I have to say while the idea that apes evolved from humans is laughable

I have to commend Ptif219 for at least accepting that evolution occurs.

Given the number of people who do not accept that evolution occurs, and I truely would have thought ptif219 would have been one of them, the fact that he accepts evolution is certainly a step above many, even though the theory he is proposing is not an accepted aspect of evolutionary theory
 
Lord Tammerlain said:
I have to say while the idea that apes evolved from humans is laughable

I have to commend Ptif219 for at least accepting that evolution occurs.

Given the number of people who do not accept that evolution occurs, and I truely would have thought ptif219 would have been one of them, the fact that he accepts evolution is certainly a step above many, even though the theory he is proposing is not an accepted aspect of evolutionary theory
Click to expand...

Evolution happens for species to adapt to changing environments
 
ptif219 said:
Evolution happens for species to adapt to changing environments
Click to expand...

So why is this process limited? Over millions of years, why cannot a species adapt to the point where it is no longer recognizable from its previous state? Species can clearly go extinct... so where do they come from? They clearly haven't all been around for the entirety of Earth's existence. Species must come from somewhere, and evolution and natural selection has been the most successful theory in determining how this process works.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom