• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

America’s Only Black Senator Not Invited To MLK Event Because He’s A Republican…

No one spoke words like this.

Of course not. If MLK Jr was alive today, his speeches would be deemed racist. You can't say that black people should be the best street sweepers around. You can't say that black people should have a job. Anything less than saying welfare, healthcare and cell phones for all is racist by today's liberals' standards.
 
was not invited to a liberal event.

So again we go back to the celebrating a historical event is a liberal thing. And the cycle continues.
 
Of course not. If MLK Jr was alive today, his speeches would be deemed racist. You can't say that black people should be the best street sweepers around. You can't say that black people should have a job. Anything less than saying welfare, healthcare and cell phones for all is racist by today's liberals' standards.

I'd say pretty damn close to a fact in political circles.
 
So again we go back to the celebrating a historical event is a liberal thing. And the cycle continues.

No. This event is a liberal sponsored event. That does not make it the only event, or the only possible event.
 

You have said as much before. I don't care about your circular logic that keeps coming back to making celebrations of historic events political.
 
Several Republicans were invited to speak, but all declined.
Former NAACP Chairman Julian Bond told MSNBC Wednesday that event organizers invited “a long list of Republicans to come,” but each declined. A spokesman for Speaker John Boehner acknowledged that Mr. Boehner was invited to speak but instead had marked the anniversary by speaking at a July event commemorating the march in the Rotunda of the Capitol, with other top lawmakers including Senate Majority Leader Sen. Harry Reid (D., Nev.).
At 50th Anniversary of March, No GOP Speakers - Washington Wire - WSJ
 
You have said as much before. I don't care about your circular logic that keeps coming back to making celebrations of historic events political.

Which is again not what I have said. Making **** up is not a particularly good debate tactic.
 
Which is again not what I have said. Making **** up is not a particularly good debate tactic.

But you have acknowledged that this was a political (liberal) event. Not sure how you cant see how unfortunate it is to take the anniversary of something that marked a monumental shift in American history, and turn it into cheap political theatre. Liberals should be ashamed of themselves, but they never are.
 
A liberal group? I dont think The Martin luther King Center for NonViolent Change is supposed to be liberal...or conservative...or political in any way shape or form as a 501C4 non profit.

Its OK....they invite who they want and they invited al democrats. Fitting, since the black community has embraced democrat programs and policies ever since LBJ "got them niggers voting democrat for the next 200 years." And just LOOK at the benefits to the black community. Rampant teen pregnancy, unwed mothers/fatherless homes, ever climbing unemployment at a rate double that of everyone else (white and Hispanic America included) blood in the streets, and every MLK Boulevard in America a free fire zone.

Somewhere...I think Dr Kings message went horribly horribly wrong.

MLK fought and stood for economic equality and social justice. MLK's march on Washington was called...." March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom." His "I have a dream speech" inspired the passing of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 that banned discrimination based on "race, color, religion, or national origin" in employment practices and public accommodationswas passed. That was soon followed with the Voting Rights Act of 1965 that restored and protected voting rights for blacks, and the Immigration and Nationality Services Act of 1965 that opened entry to the U.S. to immigrants other than traditional European groups, and the Fair Housing Act of 1968 that banned discrimination in the sale or rental of housing.....


African-American Civil Rights Movement (1955

Do any of those pieces of civil rights legislation fit your conservative beliefs? Because in the last couple of years, every single one of those legislative achievements has been attacked and/or undermined by tea party Republicans, including the Civil Rights Act itself.

Sen. Tim Scott is a tea party republican and I don't think anyone wanted to hear tea party talking points on the anniversary of MLK's famous march on Washington....and rightly so. It would be an insult to everything MLK believed.
 
Do any of those pieces of civil rights legislation fit your conservative beliefs? Because in the last couple of years, every single one of those legislative achievements has been attacked and/or undermined by tea party Republicans, including the Civil Rights Act itself.

Is it just me or does anyone else here the twilight zone music?
 
MLK fought and stood for economic equality and social justice. MLK's march on Washington was called...." March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom." His "I have a dream speech" inspired the passing of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 that banned discrimination based on "race, color, religion, or national origin" in employment practices and public accommodationswas passed. That was soon followed with the Voting Rights Act of 1965 that restored and protected voting rights for blacks, and the Immigration and Nationality Services Act of 1965 that opened entry to the U.S. to immigrants other than traditional European groups, and the Fair Housing Act of 1968 that banned discrimination in the sale or rental of housing.....


African-American Civil Rights Movement (1955

Do any of those pieces of civil rights legislation fit your conservative beliefs? Because in the last couple of years, every single one of those legislative achievements has been attacked and/or undermined by tea party Republicans, including the Civil Rights Act itself.
In what way?
 
MLK fought and stood for economic equality and social justice. MLK's march on Washington was called...." March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom." His "I have a dream speech" inspired the passing of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 that banned discrimination based on "race, color, religion, or national origin" in employment practices and public accommodationswas passed. That was soon followed with the Voting Rights Act of 1965 that restored and protected voting rights for blacks, and the Immigration and Nationality Services Act of 1965 that opened entry to the U.S. to immigrants other than traditional European groups, and the Fair Housing Act of 1968 that banned discrimination in the sale or rental of housing.....


African-American Civil Rights Movement (1955

Do any of those pieces of civil rights legislation fit your conservative beliefs? Because in the last couple of years, every single one of those legislative achievements has been attacked and/or undermined by tea party Republicans, including the Civil Rights Act itself.

Sen. Tim Scott is a tea party republican and I don't think anyone wanted to hear tea party talking points on the anniversary of MLK's famous march on Washington....and rightly so. It would be an insult to everything MLK believed.
Pray tell...how has the black American fared since embracing the democrat party?
 
But you have acknowledged that this was a political (liberal) event. Not sure how you cant see how unfortunate it is to take the anniversary of something that marked a monumental shift in American history, and turn it into cheap political theatre. Liberals should be ashamed of themselves, but they never are.

How do you feel about "social justice", Fletch?
 
How do you feel about "social justice", Fletch?
Depends upon how you define that. If by social justice you mean robbing Peter to pay Paul, I am against it.
 
Depends upon how you define that. If by social justice you mean robbing Peter to pay Paul, I am against it.
Much of the South's wealth was built on the free labor of slaves. So in essence, the slaves were robbed to pay Paul. MLK advocated social justice for the descendents of slaves. What do you think he had in mind?
 
Pray tell...how has the black American fared since embracing the democrat party?
It would probably be more honest if you'd asked how the black American has faired since conservatives embraced Reagan's war on drugs? Not very well I'm sad to say because the war on drugs has become the new Jim Crow.

Race and the War on Drugs - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"...The drug war has been brutal—complete with SWAT teams, tanks, bazookas, grenade launchers, and sweeps of entire neighborhoods—but those who live in white communities have little clue to the devastation wrought. This war has been waged almost exclusively in poor communities of color, even though studies consistently show that people of all colors use and sell illegal drugs at remarkably similar rates. In fact, some studies indicate that white youth are significantly more likely to engage in illegal drug dealing than black youth. Any notion that drug use among African Americans is more severe or dangerous is belied by the data. White youth, for example, have about three times the number of drug-related visits to the emergency room as their African American counterparts.

That is not what you would guess, though, when entering our nation’s prisons and jails, overflowing as they are with black and brown drug offenders. In some states, African Americans comprise 80 to 90 percent of all drug offenders sent to prison.

This is the point at which I am typically interrupted and reminded that black men have higher rates of violent crime. That’s why the drug war is waged in poor communities of color and not middle class suburbs. Drug warriors are trying to get rid of those drug kingpins and violent offenders who make ghetto communities a living hell. It has nothing to do with race; it’s all about violent crime.

Again, not so. President Ronald Reagan officially declared the current drug war in 1982, when drug crime was declining, not rising. From the outset, the war had little to do with drug crime and nearly everything to do with racial politics. The drug war was part of a grand and highly successful Republican Party strategy of using racially coded political appeals on issues of crime and welfare to attract poor and working class white voters who were resentful of, and threatened by desegregation, busing, and affirmative action. In the words of H.R. Haldeman, President Richard Nixon’s White House Chief of Staff: “[T]he whole problem is really the blacks. The key is to devise a system that recognizes this while not appearing to.”

•There are more African Americans under correctional control today—in prison or jail, on probation or parole—than were enslaved in 1850, a decade before the Civil War began.

•As of 2004, more African American men were disenfranchised (due to felon disenfranchisement laws) than in 1870, the year the Fifteenth Amendment was ratified, prohibiting laws that explicitly deny the right to vote on the basis of race.

•A black child born today is less likely to be raised by both parents than a black child born during slavery. The recent disintegration of the African American family is due in large part to the mass imprisonment of black fathers.

•If you take into account prisoners, a large majority of African American men in some urban areas have been labeled felons for life. (In the Chicago area, the figure is nearly 80 percent.) These men are part of a growing undercaste—not class, caste—permanently relegated by law to a second-class status. They can be denied the right to vote, automatically excluded from juries, and legally discriminated against in employment, housing, access to education, and public benefits, much as their grandparents and great-grandparents were during the Jim Crow era.....

The War on Drugs and the New Jim Crow | Urban Habitat
 
tim-scott-550x275.jpg

These people should be ashamed of themselves.

Via Red Alert Politics:

Noticeably absent from the speaker line-up at the Let Freedom Ring event commemorating the 50th anniversary of the March on Washington today: the nation’s only black Senator, Tim Scott.

Scott, a Republican Representative appointed by S.C. Governor Nikki Haley earlier this year to fill former Sen. Jim DeMint’s seat in the U.S. Senate after he retired, was not invited to participate in the historic event, a spokesperson for the Senator confirmed to Red Alert Politics in an email.

African-American leaders who did receive an invitation to speak at included Rep. John Lewis (D-Ga.) – who participated in the original March – Martin Luther King III, MSNBC host Al Sharpton and movie stars Jamie Foxx, Oprah Winfrey and Forest Whitaker.


Read more:
America’s Only Black Senator Not Invited To MLK Event Because He’s A Republican… | Weasel Zippers

Hmm..., I wonder why Senator Scott was not invited to speak?

probably because the NAACP gave him an "F" on civil rights ...
 
I don't think he is an organizer of the event. Just sayin'.



So to support a historic event, one must be liberal? Really?

last thing any Republican needs is to be seen in a photo with Obama, sharing a stage with Obama, or appearing to be in support of civil rights and the voting rights act ... trust me, Republicans didn't want to be there ...
 
from a Washington Post story:

Not a single Republican elected official stood on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial on Wednesday with activists, actors, lawmakers and former presidents invited to mark the 50th anniversary of the March on Washington — a notable absence for a party seeking to attract the support of minority voters.

Event organizers said Wednesday that they invited top Republicans, all of whom declined to attend because of scheduling conflicts or ill health. ...

Michael Steele, the first black Republican lieutenant governor of Maryland and a former Republican National Committee chairman, said event organizers told him that they were having difficulty attracting Republican speakers. He faulted GOP leaders for not making time to attend.

“It’s part of a continuing narrative that the party finds itself in with these big deals for minority communities around the country and how they perceive our response to them,” he said.
 
It is really funny how hard conservatives try to pretend that they were responsible for the civil rights movement, or have anything positive to offer minorities, especially poor ones. Guys, you're not fooling anyone. Not when it comes to blacks and latinos, not when it comes to women, not when it comes to religious minorities, not when it comes to gays. You're the obstacle to liberty and prosperity in every single case.
 
Right. Its Reagan's fault...

:lamo

Well, he did stigmatize the blacks as "welfare queens' and started the war on drugs which disproportionately incarcerated blacks. You'd have to be blind not to see the damage it's caused in black communittees.
 
Well, he did stigmatize the blacks as "welfare queens' and started the war on drugs which disproportionately incarcerated blacks. You'd have to be blind not to see the damage it's caused in black communittees.

You know why some black people in this county are successful and some people not? Because they WORK for it. They teach values. They dont procreate like rabbits and have kids they can't afford. The go to school, have career goals and visions just like every other successful person regardless of their skin color.

Or...you know...Ronald Reagan.
 
It is really funny how hard conservatives try to pretend that they were responsible for the civil rights movement, or have anything positive to offer minorities, especially poor ones. Guys, you're not fooling anyone. Not when it comes to blacks and latinos, not when it comes to women, not when it comes to religious minorities, not when it comes to gays. You're the obstacle to liberty and prosperity in every single case.
Its pathetic and laughable when you say something like that in the face of ALL the evidence in every major democrat controlled city in the entire country. It MIGHT just be that the only real obstacle to minority success are the people telling them how poor and pathetic and incapable they are of finding success without their democrat party saviors. And...btw...50 years of voting democrat...hows that going again?

Immigrants come here EVERY DAY from all around the globe. All races. And sunovagun...they manage to work, find jobs, send their kids to school, and succeed. Amazing, innit.
 
Back
Top Bottom