- Joined
- Mar 5, 2008
- Messages
- 113,005
- Reaction score
- 60,584
- Location
- Sarasota Fla
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Obama administration disclosed plans Tuesday to cut or roll back hundreds of federal regulations, including some that will streamline tax forms at the Internal Revenue Service, let railroad companies pass on installing expensive new technology, and speed up the visa process for low-risk visitors to the U.S.
Sunstein said the reforms would not impact regulations needed to protect consumers and the environment,
I find it interesting, though not surprising, that EPA regs will remain a sacred cow.
And that is a good thing, we don't want companies polluting the places where we live.
Administration moves plan to ax hundreds of rules - Yahoo! News
I found this interesting. Wonder what part of the story people will find most interesting.
I find it interesting, though not surprising, that EPA regs will remain a sacred cow.
Kids today dont breath enough lead and mercury. They dont eat enough pesticides in their food, and drink enough insecticide in their drinking water. It is making them soft.
Why back in the day, kids would be sprayed with DDT, and would lick the mercury from the back of mirrors
This is why Obama will be a one-term president - as a liberal, he is for unnecessary regulation and is for killing jobs here in the U.S. Just like he's for pulling the troops out of Iraq and Afghanistan, just like he's for the closing of the GITMO prison camps, just like he's for a national health service, and just like he's for ending the Bush Tax Cuts.
All of his actions in support of such liberal policies prove why he'll lose in '12.
Did... did you read a different article?
Or are you just so blindly partisan that you read the words "administration" and "rules" and assumed that axing regulations somehow meant more regulation because OBAMA BAD LIBRULS BAD RAAAARR CANT READ ARTICLE MUST ATTACK OBAMA INSTEAD
Dood couldnt see that? People be trippin...over themselves.he was being sarcastic.
Thats a VERY good question...one they SHOULD be asking the industrial leaders of the country that can actually ACCOMPLISH that task...So which ones might actually make a difference in job creation?
opcorn2:
Kids today dont breath enough lead and mercury. They dont eat enough pesticides in their food, and drink enough insecticide in their drinking water. It is making them soft.
Why back in the day, kids would be sprayed with DDT, and would lick the mercury from the back of mirrors
he was being sarcastic.
Thats a VERY good question...one they SHOULD be asking the industrial leaders of the country that can actually ACCOMPLISH that task...
Thats a VERY good question...one they SHOULD be asking the industrial leaders of the country that can actually ACCOMPLISH that task...
Thats a VERY good question...one they SHOULD be asking the industrial leaders of the country that can actually ACCOMPLISH that task...
They care about employing people? They can be trusted in regulating themselves? Sicne when was it a companies job to employ people rather than make money?
Thats a VERY good question...one they SHOULD be asking the industrial leaders of the country that can actually ACCOMPLISH that task...
I bet gas stations would love to get rid of the full service law in New Jersey and Oregon.
I've always believed most job killing/over baring regulation legislation exist on the state rather than the federal level.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?