ABC Whistleblower accuses ABC and Harris Campaign of collusion

[LouC]

Fox News just released a photo of the whistleblower.

 

[Captain America]

The people objecting to ABC's bias are not objecting to Trump being fact-checked. They are objecting to ABC's deliberate act of NOT fact-checking Kamala's lies - - and there were plenty. It's the blatant bias of the moderators they're objecting to.

I think the dems are basically the same. Kamala told a few whoppers herself, and more importantly, her entire campaign is based on deception - - i.e., she's trying to convince voters that she has magically transformed into a moderate.

Kamala has never been, is not now, and never will be a moderate. She always has been, is, and always will be a radical leftist and she would do immeasurable harm to our republic if she is elected.

Just look at California to understand why and how radical leftist governance fails hugely. California is in serious decline since the radical left took over.

Just like Trump will be be a rightwing extremist and do all that rightwing extremist bullshit he promises? Not trying to go all whataboutism, but if Trump can change his position on issues, (legalize pot, abortion regulations, etc.,) but she can't?

 

[DCCougar]

They fact-checked Trump numerous times....

Read the so-called "whistleblower" affidavit. It said Trump AGREED to be fact-checked. End of story.

 

[Captain America]

The people objecting to ABC's bias are not objecting to Trump being fact-checked. They are objecting to ABC's deliberate act of NOT fact-checking Kamala's lies - - and there were plenty. It's the blatant bias of the moderators they're objecting to.

I think the dems are basically the same. Kamala told a few whoppers herself, and more importantly, her entire campaign is based on deception - - i.e., she's trying to convince voters that she has magically transformed into a moderate.

Kamala has never been, is not now, and never will be a moderate. She always has been, is, and always will be a radical leftist and she would do immeasurable harm to our republic if she is elected.

Just look at California to understand why and how radical leftist governance fails hugely. California is in serious decline since the radical left took over.

One more thing, you alluded that Trump got all fact checked up and Harris did not. So, I GOOGLE'd. Harris most certainly did get fact checked and there are no shortage of fact check sites reporting the same. So that claim is debunked.

Now, if you want to say that Trump got more dings by the fact checker's than Harris did, well, I can agree with that. He most certainly did.

That reminds me of a joke. A flock of geese were flying overhead in their usual V formation and the little girl asked her father why one line of geese in the formation was longer than the other? The father answered, "because there are more geese in it."

IOW, Trump tells more lies, ergo, he gets more fact checks. Simple math.

I have to wonder, if Trump has to continue with his compulsive lying just to get his base to continue supporting him, what does that say about his base?

 

[jaypatriot]

Just like Trump will be be a rightwing extremist and do all that rightwing extremist bullshit he promises? Not trying to go all whataboutism, but if Trump can change his position on issues, (legalize pot, abortion regulations, etc.,) but she can't?

They are both employing political bullshit rhetoric to firm up their base and get undecided voters to lean their way.

 

[Captain America]

They are both employing political bullshit rhetoric to firm up their base and get undecided voters to lean their way.

Indeed.

I will be so glad when this is over and I get my TV back.

But something tells me, win or lose, Trump isn't going away. I suspect he will dominate the airwaves for years to come.

 

[gman]

I’m afraid you’re right. Two loses for him will be too much to bear. He’ll spend the rest of his life whining, crying, and complaining except when he’s on the golf course. Then we won’t hear him. To exacerbate the mess will be the msm giving him air time and the press writing down everything he says. If the media would show some discipline and balls they’d pull the plug on his neediness for constant attention.

 

[SkyChief]

Just like Trump will be be a rightwing extremist and do all that rightwing extremist bullshit he promises? Not trying to go all whataboutism, but if Trump can change his position on issues, (legalize pot, abortion regulations, etc.,) but she can't?

LOL. That is textbook whataboutism.

One more thing, you alluded that Trump got all fact checked up and Harris did not. So, I GOOGLE'd. Harris most certainly did get fact checked and there are no shortage of fact check sites reporting the same. So that claim is debunked.

It is not debunked. The ABC moderators made ZERO attempts to fact check Kamala during the debate. The fact-checkers were at their cubicles. These people are not relevant to what the moderators did (or rather didn't do in this case)

Now, if you want to say that Trump got more dings by the fact checker's than Harris did, well, I can agree with that. He most certainly did.

Again, Kamala was NOT fact checked by the ABC moderators during the debate. This is explained in the affidavit provided in the OP:

. . . in fact, various people [in ABC] were assigned to fact check observations it was perceived candidate trump would make during the debate. In fact, the Harris campaign required assurances [from ABC] that Donald Trump would be fact checked. This was done via multiple communications with the Harris campaign, whereas the Trump campaign was NOT included in the negotiations. . .

This tells the part of the story that voters need to know about the bias of ABC's presidential debate. The playing field was NOT level, and ABC clearly went to great lengths to ensure to give Harris advantages. THE FIX WAS IN.

ABC is an unscrupulous media outlet and highly biased. They should never again be given the opportunity to host a presidential debate. They should be blacklisted.

. . . .I have to wonder, if Trump has to continue with his compulsive lying just to get his base to continue supporting him, what does that say about his base?

Kamala Harris lies often, and her ignorant supporters . . . well . . .ignore it.

I think it's the same with Trump's supporters . . . they ignore his lies.

 

[Credence]

FCC chair rejects Trump call to pull ABC licenses over presidential debate​

September 19, 2024 8:53 PM EDT Updated 8 hours ago


WASHINGTON, Sept 19 (Reuters) - The chair of the Federal Communications Commission rejected former U.S. President Donald Trump's suggestion that Walt Disney-owned (DIS.N) ABC should lose its broadcast licenses over the network's moderating of the Sept. 10 presidential debate.

"The First Amendment is a cornerstone of our democracy. The Commission does not revoke licenses for broadcast stations simply because a political candidate disagrees with or dislikes content or coverage," FCC chair Jessica Rosenworcel said on Thursday. The FCC, an independent federal agency, does not license broadcast networks, but issues them to individual broadcast stations that are renewed for eight-year periods.

Trump claimed the debate was "rigged" because the ABC News moderators fact checked several comments he made. "They ought to take away their license for the way they did that," Trump told Fox News. The Trump campaign and Disney did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

Rosenworcel, a Democrat, made the statement after Senators Ed Markey and Ron Wyden had asked all five FCC commissioners to address Trump's comments. The senators, both Democrats, said the former president's "threat to revoke an FCC license over his dissatisfaction with ABC’s handling of the debate is a serious threat to the First Amendment and antithetical to the FCC’s mission."

Read more: https://www.reuters.com/business/me...licenses-over-presidential-debate-2024-09-19/

 

[JasperL]

So, anyone know what happened to this fake affidavit filed with no one by ???????????? alleging bias on the part of the ABC debate team?

That’s new. Thanks.

Did you discover which agency got this "affidavit" from ?????? Anyone figure out his name? Has he provided any meat to the nonsense bones in his supposed affidavit?

Below is a 6 page Affidavit signed under oath and date stamped the day before the debate.

It is by an ABC News Employee accusing ABC News and the Campaign for Kamala Harris of agreeing to a secret deal before the debate to avoid certain questions, and to not fact check Kamala Harris' statements during the debate.

They claim to have audio recordings of conversations verifying his statements.

This would certainly explain why Harris was able to get away with the "Very Fine People" and "Bloodbath" lies without a challenge from the moderators.

The Whistleblower has offered to testify before congress


View attachment 67532608
View attachment 67532609
View attachment 67532610

What's the progress on all this? Did the Twitter hack ever release the audio recordings? What's his name? Or is he testifying to Congress in secret, maybe behind a curtain, with his voice altered/?

 

[Emlee]

Billionaire Bill Ackman Admits Debate Conspiracy He Pushed Is Fake​

Billionaire Bill Ackman spent days after the ABC presidential debate promoting false claims that a network “whistleblower” had allegedly uncovered collusion between ABC and Kamala Harris’ campaign. Now, a month and multiple denials later, he sees the claims differently.

“It seems pretty clear that the alleged @abc whistleblower debate story claiming that @KamalaHarris was given questions in advance and other advantages was a fake,” Ackman posted on X alongside a blog post by Megyn Kelly discussing the dubious claims.

What Ackman, CEO of Pershing Square Capital Management, did not acknowledge, however, is that he was one of falsehood’s early boosters.

After an X account named “Black Insurrectionist” claimed it had been in touch with a whistleblower who alleged the Harris campaign had been given debate topics ahead of the showdown with Donald Trump and had demanded Trump—and Trump alone—be fact-checked.

Billionaire Bill Ackman Admits Conspiracy He Pushed Is Fake

“It seems pretty clear that the alleged @abc whistleblower debate story claiming that @KamalaHarris was given questions in advance and other advantages was a fake,” Ackman posted.

www.thedailybeast.com

 

[Emlee]

So, anyone know what happened to this fake affidavit filed with no one by ???????????? alleging bias on the part of the ABC debate team?


Did you discover which agency got this "affidavit" from ?????? Anyone figure out his name? Has he provided any meat to the nonsense bones in his supposed affidavit?

What's the progress on all this? Did the Twitter hack ever release the audio recordings? What's his name? Or is he testifying to Congress in secret, maybe behind a curtain, with his voice altered/?

Fake, fake, fake. The anonymous twitter account where it originated, which is also the account that recently made the claims about Walz and sexual assault and which is currently flying throughout the magasphere as truth, has deleted his Twitter account.

Not the least bit surprising though those who swallowed whole this too, it spite of it being obviously fake from the start, and instead tried attacking those who said it was fake, ssdd.

 

[LouC]

Billionaire Bill Ackman Admits Debate Conspiracy He Pushed Is Fake​

Billionaire Bill Ackman spent days after the ABC presidential debate promoting false claims that a network “whistleblower” had allegedly uncovered collusion between ABC and Kamala Harris’ campaign. Now, a month and multiple denials later, he sees the claims differently.

“It seems pretty clear that the alleged @abc whistleblower debate story claiming that @KamalaHarris was given questions in advance and other advantages was a fake,” Ackman posted on X alongside a blog post by Megyn Kelly discussing the dubious claims.

What Ackman, CEO of Pershing Square Capital Management, did not acknowledge, however, is that he was one of falsehood’s early boosters.

After an X account named “Black Insurrectionist” claimed it had been in touch with a whistleblower who alleged the Harris campaign had been given debate topics ahead of the showdown with Donald Trump and had demanded Trump—and Trump alone—be fact-checked.

Billionaire Bill Ackman Admits Conspiracy He Pushed Is Fake

“It seems pretty clear that the alleged @abc whistleblower debate story claiming that @KamalaHarris was given questions in advance and other advantages was a fake,” Ackman posted.

www.thedailybeast.com

Such a nice boy!

 

[JasperL]

Below is a 6 page Affidavit signed under oath and date stamped the day before the debate.

It is by an ABC News Employee accusing ABC News and the Campaign for Kamala Harris of agreeing to a secret deal before the debate to avoid certain questions, and to not fact check Kamala Harris' statements during the debate.

They claim to have audio recordings of conversations verifying his statements.

This would certainly explain why Harris was able to get away with the "Very Fine People" and "Bloodbath" lies without a challenge from the moderators.

The Whistleblower has offered to testify before congress


View attachment 67532608
View attachment 67532609
View attachment 67532610

This document sure looked real to me at the time. A Twitter account called Black Insurrectionist published this, which seems legit I'm sure to you as well. Where can I find the secret audio recordings?

It was expected, but if it was an actual under the table agreement then it is corruption.

If it's true Trump prefers human hearts for his pre-debate dinners that would be bad as well. Is it true? Just asking questions here, and not a single member of the media has to my knowledge visited Trump's resort to inquire about how many human hearts Trump has in the freezer. CORRUPTION!!!

 

[LouC]

So it was a fake?

Is that what I am reading?

It was like the "Russia Russia Russia" hoax?

It never happened?

There is no signed affidavit from some anonymous mysterious whistleblower?

I am astonished, and disappointed!

I feel robbed, and violated!