Hitler was right about one thing. Tell a huge lie over and over, and in time people will begin to think it is true.
Look at the statement -----------separation of church and state. It is NOT in the Constitution. But I bet if a large number of people were polled, they would say it is.
What that the Constitution actually says is-----"Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of religion". And it goes on to say--------"or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, or abridging he freedom of speech.
Now let actually look at what the founding fathers wanted and were saying. Because of their recient separation from England they did not want Congress naming an official national religion like England did with the Church of England.
Therefore when a local city puts up a cross or the Star of David anywhere in their town, it IS NOT Congress naming some particular church such as Lutheran or any other as the official church of the country. When some fools such as the ACLU claims that a cross or what ever needs to be torn down, they are flying in the black and white statement in the first amendment. "or prohibiting the free exercise there of"!!!!!!!!!!!! It is simply the people of that town exercising the free exercise thereof. Again it is not Congress naming an official state religion. Did Congress come to that town and demand that the city should put up a cross or a Star of David and name a specific church the official church of the United states.
The fools on the left will hate this, since they have been brain washed with the huge lie of separation of church and state for so long, they think it is true.
Ok now let the hate towards me and the arguments begin. BTW before you do read the First Amendment.
opcorn2: (Another tried and failed argument from the OP)
opcorn2: (Another tried and failed argument from the OP)
OP fails to comprehend (or refuses to) this ^^.The only problem is that's not what's happening. Issues around religious symbols take rise when they’re displayed in government offices etc, and that's where it gets tricky because it can be perceived as the government choosing one religion.
The idea that the BoR only applies to the federal government has been rejected long ago.
The same is true for “fair trial.” It is not in the constitution but if people were polled they would say it sLook at the statement -----------separation of church and state. It is NOT in the Constitution. But I bet if a large number of people were polled, they would say it is.
And one of the reasons was that some states had official religions and didn’t want the Federal Government having a different choice.Now let actually look at what the founding fathers wanted and were saying. Because of their recient separation from England they did not want Congress naming an official national religion like England did with the Church of England.
What is the caffeine content of your morning covfefe?
A huge lie that has been told so many time people think it is true.
Hitler was right about one thing. Tell a huge lie over and over, and in time people will begin to think it is true.
Look at the statement -----------separation of church and state. It is NOT in the Constitution. But I bet if a large number of people were polled, they would say it is.
What that the Constitution actually says is-----"Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of religion". And it goes on to say--------"or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, or abridging he freedom of speech.
Now let actually look at what the founding fathers wanted and were saying. Because of their recient separation from England they did not want Congress naming an official national religion like England did with the Church of England.
Therefore when a local city puts up a cross or the Star of David anywhere in their town, it IS NOT Congress naming some particular church such as Lutheran or any other as the official church of the country. When some fools such as the ACLU claims that a cross or what ever needs to be torn down, they are flying in the black and white statement in the first amendment. "or prohibiting the free exercise there of"!!!!!!!!!!!! It is simply the people of that town exercising the free exercise thereof. Again it is not Congress naming an official state religion. Did Congress come to that town and demand that the city should put up a cross or a Star of David and name a specific church the official church of the United states.
The fools on the left will hate this, since they have been brain washed with the huge lie of separation of church and state for so long, they think it is true.
Ok now let the hate towards me and the arguments begin. BTW before you do read the First Amendment.
Hitler was right about one thing. Tell a huge lie over and over, and in time people will begin to think it is true.
It was a means to simplify the description given in the constitution. From there, the lawyers and the victim industry started rolling elected representatives to get them on board. Most politicians bark is worse than their lick.
Either way, it's best not to post things like this on Sunday because you are inviting a liberal beat down. Sunday is this crew's worse day of the week, and all the bullies are out hunting for some one to beat on.
But again, not government but CONGRESS. Read what the Constitution says in black and white.The only problem is that's not what's happening. Issues around religious symbols take rise when they're displayed in government offices etc, and that's where it gets tricky because it can be perceived as the government choosing one religion.
Hitler was right about one thing. Tell a huge lie over and over, and in time people will begin to think it is true.
Look at the statement -----------separation of church and state. It is NOT in the Constitution. But I bet if a large number of people were polled, they would say it is.
What that the Constitution actually says is-----"Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of religion". And it goes on to say--------"or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, or abridging he freedom of speech.
Now let actually look at what the founding fathers wanted and were saying. Because of their recient separation from England they did not want Congress naming an official national religion like England did with the Church of England.
Therefore when a local city puts up a cross or the Star of David anywhere in their town, it IS NOT Congress naming some particular church such as Lutheran or any other as the official church of the country. When some fools such as the ACLU claims that a cross or what ever needs to be torn down, they are flying in the black and white statement in the first amendment. "or prohibiting the free exercise there of"!!!!!!!!!!!! It is simply the people of that town exercising the free exercise thereof. Again it is not Congress naming an official state religion. Did Congress come to that town and demand that the city should put up a cross or a Star of David and name a specific church the official church of the United states.
The fools on the left will hate this, since they have been brain washed with the huge lie of separation of church and state for so long, they think it is true.
Ok now let the hate towards me and the arguments begin. BTW before you do read the First Amendment.
Hitler was right about one thing. Tell a huge lie over and over, and in time people will begin to think it is true.
Look at the statement -----------separation of church and state. It is NOT in the Constitution. But I bet if a large number of people were polled, they would say it is.
What that the Constitution actually says is-----"Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of religion". And it goes on to say--------"or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, or abridging he freedom of speech.
Now let actually look at what the founding fathers wanted and were saying. Because of their recient separation from England they did not want Congress naming an official national religion like England did with the Church of England.
Therefore when a local city puts up a cross or the Star of David anywhere in their town, it IS NOT Congress naming some particular church such as Lutheran or any other as the official church of the country. When some fools such as the ACLU claims that a cross or what ever needs to be torn down, they are flying in the black and white statement in the first amendment. "or prohibiting the free exercise there of"!!!!!!!!!!!! It is simply the people of that town exercising the free exercise thereof. Again it is not Congress naming an official state religion. Did Congress come to that town and demand that the city should put up a cross or a Star of David and name a specific church the official church of the United states.
The fools on the left will hate this, since they have been brain washed with the huge lie of separation of church and state for so long, they think it is true.
Ok now let the hate towards me and the arguments begin. BTW before you do read the First Amendment.
In this whole business, it is the long irate atheist that in some city that gets his nose out of joint about a cross or a star of David.
Lets look at this logically. If an atheist doesnt believe in Christ, the cross then is just a geometric shape.
Yes. It was the Jefferson SCOTUS that misinterpreted the separation of church and state ideology - meaning no church in state - into The Constitution (for the benefit of atheists, I believe). Once the precedent is made, it becomes The Constitution. It's called legislating from the bench.Hitler was right about one thing. Tell a huge lie over and over, and in time people will begin to think it is true.
Look at the statement -----------separation of church and state. It is NOT in the Constitution. But I bet if a large number of people were polled, they would say it is.
What that the Constitution actually says is-----"Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of religion". And it goes on to say--------"or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, or abridging he freedom of speech.
Now let actually look at what the founding fathers wanted and were saying. Because of their recient separation from England they did not want Congress naming an official national religion like England did with the Church of England.
Therefore when a local city puts up a cross or the Star of David anywhere in their town, it IS NOT Congress naming some particular church such as Lutheran or any other as the official church of the country. When some fools such as the ACLU claims that a cross or what ever needs to be torn down, they are flying in the black and white statement in the first amendment. "or prohibiting the free exercise there of"!!!!!!!!!!!! It is simply the people of that town exercising the free exercise thereof. Again it is not Congress naming an official state religion. Did Congress come to that town and demand that the city should put up a cross or a Star of David and name a specific church the official church of the United states.
The fools on the left will hate this, since they have been brain washed with the huge lie of separation of church and state for so long, they think it is true.
Ok now let the hate towards me and the arguments begin. BTW before you do read the First Amendment.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?