- Joined
- Mar 7, 2018
- Messages
- 62,581
- Reaction score
- 19,334
- Location
- Lower Mainland of BC
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Centrist
As you can see, the US spends less of its GDP on NATO than Canada does.First off, How about all the countries that are still not paying their proper share of NATO be brought up to date, before any expansion of NATO? Does the USA have more money to throw at NATO? Of course not.
I see, so mentioning that NATO is interested in the effects of climate change is now totally verboten and is the same thing as saying "We are going to toss a whole truckload of money into NATO's climate change amelioration efforts.". Suuuuuuuuuuurrrrrrrrrrrrreeeeeeeeeee it is.Second, what the hell is anything about climate change doing in a NATO Bill?
Of course this shit needs to be rejected.
“Our commitment to shared democratic values is what distinguishes NATO from other military alliances,” said Rep. Connolly. “Without it, NATO is just another military block that does not like Russia. But this commitment cannot remain purely aspirational or rhetorical. It must be operationalized. This is why we believe that we need formal architecture in NATO itself. There are divisions and units within NATO dedicated to collective defense, terrorism, hybrid warfare, cyber, climate change, and all other security challenges. But after 72 years, there’s not even a broom closet in NATO headquarters dedicated to democratic institution building. This Center is long overdue. I want to thank my friend, Mike Turner, for his collaboration on this resolution, and I look forward to working with him further to pass it in the House.”