- Oct 3, 2008
- Reaction score
- Political Leaning
Can someone explain the connection between '10% reduction of CO2' and the 'roughly 10%' people that had the button pushed on them??
Which brings me to the latest effort by greenpeace...
Am I the ONLY one that sees something disconnect between 'preventing global warming' and what is presented in these ads??
Finally, EVEN IF the science wasn't a complete hoax and a fraud on every front, why are these people subtly pushing violence against those that might not think that CO2 is as devastating as say the 20 or so other toxic elements that might come with the CO2 (as in with car exhaust).
I would also have to bring up
Environmental Militant James Lee Shot and Killed After Taking Hostages at Discovery Channel Headquarters - ABC NewsIn a rambling manifesto on Lee's website, believed to have been written by Lee, the writer rails against "disgusting human babies," "parasitic infants," and says people should "disassemble civilization." The manifesto also calls on Discovery to "broadcast to the world their commitment to save the planet."
I could cite a few more similar examples of what the green agenda is being turned into...
Hopefully I didn't throw in too much of my opinions to prevent discussion... but this is hard to keep objective about.