Everybody can see that you employ this strategy.Because making **** up is so much more effective at eluding those pesky facts.
You are making **** up. "Quashing a non existent affidavit was the other," was never said by Wolfinger. What he actually said was:
I am outraged by the outright lies contained in the letter by Benjamin Crump to Deputy Assistant Attorney General Roy Austin dated April 2, 2012. I encourage the Justice Department to investigate and document that no such meeting or communication occurred.
That is the very communication he is denying.What he disputed was the claim in that letter that he was involved with in a meeting with Lee (and possibly family members of Zimmerman) over communication with Serino about his recommendation to charge Zimmerman with manslaughter. He never denied that Serino filed an affidavit.
:lamoBut let's cut to the chase. You are trying your hardest to dispute the claim that the police department wanted to charge Zimmerman. But Serino, the lead investigator, believed Zimmerman acted unlawfully, wanted him charged with manslaughter, and filed this in an affidavit...
Asked to confirm that the police recommended a manslaughter charge, special prosecutor Angela Corey said: “I don’t know about that, but as far as the process I can tell you that the police went to the state attorney with a capias request, meaning: ‘We’re through with our investigation and here it is for you.’ The state attorney impaneled a grand jury, but before anything else could be done, the governor stepped in and asked us to pick it up in midstream.”
You do not know that.The man running the investigation didn't believe Zimmerman's account ... why do you?
lolAnd by the way, you can be certain that Serino will be testifying in court should this case make it to trial.
Let's not forget, amidst all this distraction of when the affidavit was filed, the salient point you are struggling to impeach is that the lead investigator didn't believe Zimmerman's account and sought to have him arrested and charged with manslaughter.She is taking about what was filed after the initial investigation was done.
Not what was alleged to be filed the night of the shooting, which has never been confirmed, which is prior to the end of the investigation. :doh
And yes, it is disputed.
"I am outraged by the outright lies contained in the letter ..."
The meeting would be one event.
Quashing a non existent affidavit was the other.
Nothing more than lies.
ok, i realize the martin family attorney has been propagating that notionLet's not forget, amidst all this distraction of when the affidavit was filed, the salient point you are struggling to impeach is that the lead investigator didn't believe Zimmerman's account and sought to have him arrested and charged with manslaughter.
You mean point out when you make **** up? Like you did here? Wolfinger denied he had a meeting with Lee (and possibly Zimmerman's family) the night of the shooting and he denied having any communication that night with Serino about charging Zimmerman with manslaughter. He never denied there was an affidavit filed.Everybody can see that you employ this strategy.
He implied he had no communication with Serino on the matter on the day of the shooting. He does not deny that Serino filed an affidavit; he doesn't even speak about it.Ah... helloooooo? Mcfly?
Just what do you think the communication is that's being denied?
That would be to quash, suppress or overrule an alleged affidavit or recommendation.
Bull****. Here is evidence it exists...That is the very communication he is denying.
That is what this hubbub is all about.
A supposed affidavit.
An affidavit for which there is no evidence that it exists.
Your struggles with the English language are scary.:lamo
Read the article and see what is being spoken about.
In this interview Corey is being asked about the alleged "affidavit or recommendation" from "early in the investigation" and she replies with what?
Oh yeah... she said: “I don’t know about that,”.
Did you get that? She said: “I don’t know about that,”.
I think he is going to explain to the court why he rejected Zimmerman's account of self defense and felt manslaughter charges were warranted.And by the way, you can be certain that Serino will be testifying in court should this case make it to trial.
lol
Big deal? So what?
You think he is going to get on the stand and make **** up like you have been doing? :doh
lol
"I don’t know about that, but as far as the process I can tell you that the police went to the state attorney with a capias request, meaning: ‘We’re through with our investigation and here it is for you.’" ~ Angela Coreyok, i realize the martin family attorney has been propagating that notion but what can you cite as being evidence this happened as you have presented?
I think he is going to explain to the court why he rejected Zimmerman's account of self defense and felt manslaughter charges were warranted.
Is the affidavit that Serino filed a capias?"I don’t know about that, but as far as the process I can tell you that the police went to the state attorney with a capias request, meaning: ‘We’re through with our investigation and here it is for you.’" ~ Angela Corey
I think all that we have is the "multiple sources of ABC on the 27th iirc and Reuters single source in early April, (7th?). All that we have besides what Parks Crump have been saying. But their version has raised some objections from the alleged participants which the news stories did not. Of course the news versions did not contain the items detailed as inaccurate. So, perhaps that's the difference.ok, i realize the martin family attorney has been propagating that notion
but what can you cite as being evidence this happened as you have presented?
Those look like 16 ouncers.Check this out.
Rare Video Of Trayvon Martin Fighting Video
Those look like 16 ouncers.
Still they should have gotten the headgear as well.
and the other guy needs to drop his elbows
What exactly are you looking for?I have a question on this issue.
Assuming the investigation has resolved, would you please post a link to the results of it? Been searching on Google and haven't found it yet.
It'd be appreciated. Thank you.
16oz gloves are good beginner gloves. they offer lots of protection for hands, body, & head. They give you a chance to build up some strength and stamina in your shoulders etc.Headgear.. absolutely...
I have never seen anyone stick their elbows out like that either..
What exactly are you looking for?
A big dump of evidence?
The prosecutors' pc letter?
or what?
Sanford has pulled their documentation from the web afaict.Any objective facts from the presumably completed investigation that I can work with.
A capias is a request for an arrest warrant. An affidavit containing probable cause must be filed with the capias. So when Corey confirmed that the police department submitted a capias, it is implied that it was with an affidavit since one is required.Is the affidavit that Serino filed a capias?
According to some, here, a bulletproof vest would have been more appropriate.Those look like 16 ouncers.
Still they should have gotten the headgear as well.
and the other guy needs to drop his elbows
That's still not the same thing as saying that what Serino filed on 02/26 was the same kind of thing as what was filed on 03/12 (or whenever).A capias is a request for an arrest warrant. An affidavit containing probable cause must be filed with the capias. So when Corey confirmed that the police department submitted a capias, it is implied that it was with an affidavit since one is required.
That is something you do not know.I think he is going to explain to the court why he rejected Zimmerman's account of self defense and felt manslaughter charges were warranted.
Unconfirmed. And disputed.Let's not forget, amidst all this distraction of when the affidavit was filed, the salient point you are struggling to impeach is that the lead investigator didn't believe Zimmerman's account and sought to have him arrested and charged with manslaughter.
In some sense I suppose.Unconfirmed.
I have seen people on this board dispute it.And disputed.
It's a reasonable assumption given he sought an arrest warrant. Why on Earth would he want Zimmerman charged if he believed Zimmerman lawfully acted in self-defense?That is something you do not know.
"I don’t know about that, but as far as the process I can tell you that the police went to the state attorney with a capias request, meaning: ‘We’re through with our investigation and here it is for you.’" ~ Angela Corey
You do not know that.It's a reasonable assumption given he sought an arrest warrant. Why on Earth would he want Zimmerman charged if he believed Zimmerman lawfully acted in self-defense?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?