• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

YOU SCARE ME - A letter from a Former Procter and Gamble Executive

Conservative

Says a lot about you and your other cult followers.


WOO, HOO
, only in conservatives compound of the brainwashed, could 69,456,897 American Citizens, and 52.9% of the poplar votes cast be called a cult. :lamo
 

WOO, HOO
, only in conservatives compound of the brainwashed, could 69,456,897 American Citizens, and 52.9% of the poplar votes cast be called a cult. :lamo

95% of African Americans voted for Obama because he was black and not because he was competent. Millions more voted for Obama because he wasn't Bush and the misinformation about the Bush record was widely spread and bought throughout this country. Millions of others voted for Obama to end the war and what Obama has done was increase the Bush defense budget, promise to close GITMO and hasn't done it, adopted the Bush Doctrine in Iraq, kept Bush's Sec. of Defense, and Brought back Petraeus to save his ass in Aghanistan.

Donc, people bought the hope and change message and have no lost hope and are left with only change in their pockets. The only ones left now are the cult followers who continue to drink the Kook-aid. Positive results matter and 16 million unemployed Americans, 3 trillion added to the debt, upcoming tax increases, uncertainty in the job markets are bringing most people back to reality.
 
95% of African Americans voted for Obama because he was black and not because he was competent. Millions more voted for Obama because he wasn't Bush and the misinformation about the Bush record was widely spread and bought throughout this country. Millions of others voted for Obama to end the war and what Obama has done was increase the Bush defense budget, promise to close GITMO and hasn't done it, adopted the Bush Doctrine in Iraq, kept Bush's Sec. of Defense, and Brought back Petraeus to save his ass in Aghanistan.

Donc, people bought the hope and change message and have no lost hope and are left with only change in their pockets. The only ones left now are the cult followers who continue to drink the Kook-aid. Positive results matter and 16 million unemployed Americans, 3 trillion added to the debt, upcoming tax increases, uncertainty in the job markets are bringing most people back to reality.
uh huh....what flavor kool aid you drinking?
 
and on the other hand our opponents are chuggin a full pitcher of cherry, rather have the grape than cherry. The argument is the same old argument..will it be peanut butter or chocolate.
 
and on the other hand our opponents are chuggin a full pitcher of cherry, rather have the grape than cherry. The argument is the same old argument..will it be peanut butter or chocolate.
i'm partial to lemon lime or orange myself:mrgreen:
 
Cheers! I'm having some chai tea.
 
95% of African Americans voted for Obama because he was black and not because he was competent.

Got a source for that?

Millions more voted for Obama because he wasn't Bush and the misinformation about the Bush record was widely spread and bought throughout this country.

Um, yeah, whatever. I voted for Obama because I didn't want McCain in control of the nukes. Dude's unstable. If there had been a viable alternative I would've gone for it.

Millions of others voted for Obama to end the war and what Obama has done was increase the Bush defense budget

He's also got a time-line for getting out.

promise to close GITMO and hasn't done it

He made one of his first executive orders as President a clear plan for doing so. It's not his fault Congress won't fund it.

adopted the Bush Doctrine in Iraq

Not commenting because I haven't been following Iraq lately.

kept Bush's Sec. of Defense

Because having a qualified man in the position is a . . . bad thing? It wasn't Rumsfeld, so what's wrong with that?

and Brought back Petraeus to save his ass in Aghanistan.

Uh, he didn't bring back Petraeus. If memory serves, Petraeus got promoted up the ladder, and Obama asked him to step back into the shoes after the man who filled Pratraeus' shoes screwed up.

Donc, people bought the hope and change message and have no lost hope and are left with only change in their pockets. The only ones left now are the cult followers who continue to drink the Kook-aid. Positive results matter and 16 million unemployed Americans, 3 trillion added to the debt, upcoming tax increases, uncertainty in the job markets are bringing most people back to reality.

Anybody who depended on Obama being the man to fix everything is a fool.

The President is powerful, and Congress gives the position more power every year so that they can take credit for his successes and blame him for any failures, which is part of why their reelection rate is so high.

Even so, he can't do everything himself.
 
[
QUOTE=TacticalEvilDan;1058880844]Got a source for that?

Yep, do your own research, Google it

Um, yeah, whatever. I voted for Obama because I didn't want McCain in control of the nukes. Dude's unstable. If there had been a viable alternative I would've gone for it.

How's that hope and change working out of your.


He's also got a time-line for getting out.

He adopted the Bush policy, the timeline was the Iraqi's step up and the U.S. will step down. That timeline is dependent on conditions on the ground which is the way it works in a war, nothing had changed.



He made one of his first executive orders as President a clear plan for doing so. It's not his fault Congress won't fund it.

Congress is under total Democrat Control and they even know that plan is foolish and wrong. Our Boy child President showed his inexperience on world affairs


Not commenting because I haven't been following Iraq lately.

Yet you claimed the has a time line for withdrawall

Because having a qualified man in the position is a . . . bad thing? It wasn't Rumsfeld, so what's wrong with that?

As has been proven, nothing. Rumsfield wasn't President of the United States.


Uh, he didn't bring back Petraeus. If memory serves, Petraeus got promoted up the ladder, and Obama asked him to step back into the shoes after the man who filled Pratraeus' shoes screwed up.

Obama did indeed bring back Petraeus by your own statement and that is the onl accurate statement you made regarding the issue.


Anybody who depended on Obama being the man to fix everything is a fool.

The President is powerful, and Congress gives the position more power every year so that they can take credit for his successes and blame him for any failures, which is part of why their reelection rate is so high.

Even so, he can't do everything himself
.

think about that the next time you and others blame Bush. Congress under the controll of Pelosi and Reid along with Obama as President have created an economy that now has 16 million unemployed American and he has added 3 trillion to the debt, hardly a success.
 
Yep, do your own research, Google it

In other words, no, you don't.

How's that hope and change working out of your.

I've stated in several different threads that I'm not happy with Obama. I did, however, accomplish what I set out to do -- keep McCain's hands off the button. :lol:

Congress is under total Democrat Control and they even know that plan is foolish and wrong. Our Boy child President showed his inexperience on world affairs

Whatever their reasoning, you tried to make it sound like Obama somehow went back on his promise with respect to GITMO. That's a total and complete lie.

Yet you claimed the has a time line for withdrawall

I was talking about Afghanistan.

As has been proven, nothing. Rumsfield wasn't President of the United States.

This comment makes zero sense.

Obama did indeed bring back Petraeus by your own statement and that is the onl accurate statement you made regarding the issue.

The way you said it, it was like he got rid of Petraeus and then begged him to come back. The opposite is true. He gave Petraeus a promotion and then asked him to fill in when he had to dump his successor.

think about that the next time you and others blame Bush. Congress under the controll of Pelosi and Reid along with Obama as President have created an economy that now has 16 million unemployed American and he has added 3 trillion to the debt, hardly a success.

Next time you want to accuse me of blaming Bush for everything, you might want to have your facts straight.


TED,
Stuck to blaming Bush for what Bush was actually responsible for, kthx.
 
[

Yep, do your own research, Google it



How's that hope and change working out of your.




He adopted the Bush policy, the timeline was the Iraqi's step up and the U.S. will step down. That timeline is dependent on conditions on the ground which is the way it works in a war, nothing had changed.





Congress is under total Democrat Control and they even know that plan is foolish and wrong. Our Boy child President showed his inexperience on world affairs




Yet you claimed the has a time line for withdrawall



As has been proven, nothing. Rumsfield wasn't President of the United States.




Obama did indeed bring back Petraeus by your own statement and that is the onl accurate statement you made regarding the issue.


.

think about that the next time you and others blame Bush. Congress under the controll of Pelosi and Reid along with Obama as President have created an economy that now has 16 million unemployed American and he has added 3 trillion to the debt, hardly a success.
you made a claim, provide the links to your sources.....not his job to prove your point for you.
 
In other words, no, you don't.



I've stated in several different threads that I'm not happy with Obama. I did, however, accomplish what I set out to do -- keep McCain's hands off the button. :lol:



Whatever their reasoning, you tried to make it sound like Obama somehow went back on his promise with respect to GITMO. That's a total and complete lie.



I was talking about Afghanistan.



This comment makes zero sense.



The way you said it, it was like he got rid of Petraeus and then begged him to come back. The opposite is true. He gave Petraeus a promotion and then asked him to fill in when he had to dump his successor.



Next time you want to accuse me of blaming Bush for everything, you might want to have your facts straight.


TED,
Stuck to blaming Bush for what Bush was actually responsible for, kthx.

Just following your example of stimulating discussion points. You spout your opinion and throw a few bombs like keeping McCain's "finger off the button" to elect the most inexperienced man in modern history to run for the Oval Office. The Obama apology tour has probably buried the button and even if it were visible he wouldn't know how to push it. Given the choice of who to defend this country, Obama wouldn't be in the top tier.

http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/11/04/exit.polls/

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Ojd13kZlCA
 
Last edited:

I guess this is supposed to be your "proof" of your claim, which was:

95% of African Americans voted for Obama because he was black and not because he was competent.

For those of you who don't have the time to waste looking at those links, they are:

1) The results of CNN exit polling, which cites that 96% of African-Americans said they voted for Obama
2) A 30-second clip where two people claimed they voted for Obama and that they were looking forward to receiving "Obama money"

In other words, Conservative has succeeded in proving that 96% of African-Americans polled claimed that they voted for Obama, and that's it.

Bravo, Conservative. Quite the bold lie you shared with us today. :lol:

Just following your example of stimulating discussion points.

What, by lying?

You spout your opinion and throw a few bombs like keeping McCain's "finger off the button" to elect the most inexperienced man in modern history to run for the Oval Office.

Well let's see, my choices were:

1) McCain, who scared me, backed up by woman with less experience than Obama
2) Obama, who didn't scare me, backed up by a man with lots of foreign policy know-how

It was, as Lewis Black has joked about elections, a choice between two bowls of **** -- and the only difference was the smell.

The Obama apology tour has probably buried the button and even if it were visible he wouldn't know how to push it. Given the choice of who to defend this country, Obama wouldn't be in the top tier.

No, but neither is he in the top tier for blowing his stack or totally fabricating foreign policy experience, either. :lol:
 
Last edited:
I guess this is supposed to be your "proof" of your claim, which was:



For those of you who don't have the time to waste looking at those links, they are"

1) The results of CNN exit polling, which cites that 96% of African-Americans said they voted for Obama
2) A 30-second clip where two people claimed they voted for Obama and that they were looking forward to receiving "Obama money"

In other words, Conservative has succeeded in proving that 96% of African-Americans polled claimed that they voted for Obama, and that's it.

Bravo, Conservative. Quite the bold lie you shared with us today. :lol:



What, by lying?



Well let's see, my choices were:

1) McCain, who scared me, backed up by woman with less experience than Obama
2) Obama, who didn't scare me, backed up by a man with lots of foreign policy know-how

It was, as Lewis Black has joked about elections, a choice between two bowls of **** -- and the only difference was the smell.



No, but neither is he in the top tier for blowing his stack or totally fabricating foreign policy experience, either. :lol:

thank you so much, appreciate the comments and of course the compliments
 
That's the second time I've seen somebody totally lose a debate and claim they won. Bizarre.
 
That's the second time I've seen somebody totally lose a debate and claim they won. Bizarre.


What’s to say, he’s a proud product of the conservative brainwashing compound. :2wave:
 
That's the second time I've seen somebody totally lose a debate and claim they won. Bizarre.

haven't been around long I see, June 2010. You are going to see a lot of that in this forum. sometimes I just get a wild hair up my you know what and play that liberal game. Why do you think 96% of African Americans voted for Barack Obama? Now I am sure that many of that 96% thought he was qualified but I am also convinced that a large number voted for him simply because he was black including the YouTube video candidate for Jay-walking
 
What’s to say, he’s a proud product of the conservative brainwashing compound. :2wave:

Donc, you are absolutely correct, I have been brainwashed into believing that there are 16 million unemployed Americans today, that BLS is partisan conservative site, that the U.S. Treasury which reports a 3 trillion dollar deficit over two years is also a strong conservative site, and that MediaMatters, MoveOn, Huffington Post are all non partisan sites that have the best interest of all Americans at heart. How are things in the land of Oz
 
Donc, you are absolutely correct, I have been brainwashed into believing that there are 16 million unemployed Americans today, that BLS is partisan conservative site, that the U.S. Treasury which reports a 3 trillion dollar deficit over two years is also a strong conservative site, and that MediaMatters, MoveOn, Huffington Post are all non partisan sites that have the best interest of all Americans at heart. How are things in the land of Oz


Considering that African Americans makeup about 14% of the population of this country your statement stands up looking pretty lame.


As for a your continuing to use the BLS as a source, without a link to the page is kinda like quoting the Encyclopedia as a source.To myself and others around here your starting to look like a caricature of all of the winger talking points in one package. When you get it in your dome that your not talking to a bunch complete idiots the better off you will be. Just my 2C.:2wave:
 
Back
Top Bottom