• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

YOU are your own first responder.

So the store owner is a "vigilante"? Look up the definition of vigilante. He was defending his own life, not going out looking for trouble like Charles Bronson. What were his options? Let himself be killed? Just because you comply with an armed robber does NOT mean they wont shoot you anyway. What an idiotic post.
Look man go outside and find a real thick tree stump. Debating that stump will bear more fruit than tshade. Doesn't even know what a vigilante is FFS. Just know this. Your thread is awesome. The video you provided was excellent, articulate, and knowledge filled. Spread the message to all your family and friends.

The grizzled leftist filth in this forum will never answer and always look to belittle.
 
LOL ... There are plenty of violent criminals in those two countries.

What they don't have is a woefully antiquated second amendment, and dozens of filthy right-wing politicians sucking gun lobbyists' dicks.

So, they can implement proper gun laws and, most importantly, severe punishments for breaking those laws...
All your above babbling and then you get to the final paragraph and poof you just proved what a shelter ignorant leftist you are. While you post pushing for "proper" gun laws, whatever that means, the left wing filthy socialist radical politicians that your side supports refuse to severely punish existing guns laws. So this begs the following questions. Are you simply so ignorant of the issue as to not know this basic information? Perhaps you do know and just don't give a shit because the anti gun agenda is all that matters. Do you understand that your side doesn't enforce the current gun laws to the fullest right now? Shouldn't you first fight for that before demanding more?

I don't expect answers unfortunately. Still my point is made.

My governor had to suspend a Tampa prosecutor for failing to enforce certain laws. There was some abortion issue stuff mixed in however this democrat Soros supported prosecutor dropped all charges on 86 violent rioters during Tampas Civil unrest recently. Businesses looted and burned. Atleast one man murdered in his business. Millions in theft and damages. No prosecutions!

So go away with this bullshit man. Come back when your side gets serious. Once all laws are fully enforced we can discuss any shortcomings. Until then you just aren't anything more than a radical leftists with an agenda who doesn't give 3 shits about the innocent victims! If you did those marshmallow soft politicians would be out.
 
What would you do if you were a bodega owner and that was your life's work?
He would have a different outlook when he was the victim. If someone came in trying to take his sweat equity, possibly his life, he would have a much different attitude. He would have empathy for that old man and the millions living with the product of failed leftist policy. Instead he probably lives a sheltered life, in a low crime area, being fed leftist propaganda daily from his favorite fake news source oblivious to the dangers faced by others. Sad really sad.
 
Are you seriously trying to imply that Canada, a nation that compels speech and does not recognize free speech at all, to be more free than the US?

You clearly have no clue. :rolleyes:
And a very bias source lol
 
This video says it all. Thank you Colion!!



What our non-Californian friend FAILS to mention is that California has strong castle doctrine AND jury instructions to regard a small business essentially the same AS one's castle.
Not perfect but Colion commits a sin of omission by not mentioning it, and he also fails to mention that Newsom has never stated any intention of weakening that castle doctrine.

The store owner, or manager or whatever, broke NO California laws when he shot back.
 
rambo-wannabe should spend some time in sane countries like Japan or Australia which have a fraction of the per-capita gun violence that we have in this sick nation...
The liquor store guy is Rambo now? Setting aside a move to another country, which is unrealistic fantasy, what would you expect him to do?
 
Uh…..no, he isn’t. Not even close. Congrats on admitting you don’t know what a fascist is.
Yeah only you know what it means right lol?
 
Not vigilante, and this was reality.
That IS reality. Self defense is not vigilantism. Our debate opponent is desperate to attack this good guy with a gun by any means necessary. Desperate to conceal or impugn. Classic leftist tactic. Dirty tactic hence our use of the word filth.
 
And a very bias source lol
The very first clue should be whether or not a nation has "hate speech" laws. Any nation that has "hate speech" laws cannot be a nation that supports free speech, by definition. Canada has numerous hate speech laws. So not only can you be arrested for what you say in Canada, you can also be arrested in Canada for what you do not say. Nobody in Canada is free, and they never have been.
 
Uh…..no, he isn’t. Not even close. Congrats on admitting you don’t know what a fascist is.
Fascism was defined by its creator, the devote socialist Benito Mussolini. Who defined it in "The Manifesto of the Italian Fasces of Combat" in 1919, a.k.a. "Fascism Manifesto," as "[a]ll within the state, nothing outside the state, nothing against the state." That is entirely a leftist philosophy. The same one that Hitler used in Germany. Which explains why Germany and Italy were such close allies during the 1930s and 1940s after Hitler became Chancellor.

It is the leftist philosophy of fascism that caused Mousilini, Hilter, Stalin, Mao, FDR, and Pol Pot to kill more than 100 million people during the last century, and there continued adherence to that sick and twisted leftist policy is what make leftists pieces of shit (or simply "filth" to save time typing) to this very day.
 
Fascism was defined by its creator, the devote socialist Benito Mussolini. Who defined it in "The Manifesto of the Italian Fasces of Combat" in 1919, a.k.a. "Fascism Manifesto," as "[a]ll within the state, nothing outside the state, nothing against the state." That is entirely a leftist philosophy. The same one that Hitler used in Germany. Which explains why Germany and Italy were such close allies during the 1930s and 1940s after Hitler became Chancellor.

It is the leftist philosophy of fascism that caused Mousilini, Hilter, Stalin, Mao, FDR, and Pol Pot to kill more than 100 million people during the last century, and there continued adherence to that sick and twisted leftist policy is what make leftists pieces of shit (or simply "filth" to save time typing) to this very day.

Benito Mussolini split with the socialists years early due to his support for Italian entry into World War One, and proceeded to have his goons actively hunt and down as murder as many of the “leftist filth” as they could catch once fascism came into power. American conservatives deeply admired Mussolini, like Hitler, for his actions in the “Crusade Against Bolshevism”. The delusion many on the American far right have that anyone who isn’t an American libertarian “small government” style nut is a “leftist” is laughably historically ignorant.

Trying to lump FDR in with Pol Pot, of all people, is downright comical.

But thanks for reminding us, yet again, why you have no credibility.
 
Benito Mussolini split with the socialists years early due to his support for Italian entry into World War One, and proceeded to have his goons actively hunt and down as murder as many of the “leftist filth” as they could catch once fascism came into power. American conservatives deeply admired Mussolini, like Hitler, for his actions in the “Crusade Against Bolshevism”. The delusion many on the American far right have that anyone who isn’t an American libertarian “small government” style nut is a “leftist” is laughably historically ignorant.

Trying to lump FDR in with Pol Pot, of all people, is downright comical.

But thanks for reminding us, yet again, why you have no credibility.
Mussolini never stopped being a socialist. He was even personally commended for his devote socialist beliefs by Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov (a.k.a. Lenin). Which is ironic, considering it was Mussolini who personally commended FDR for his devote fascist beliefs in 1936. It was the Democrats who were in bed with the German NAZI Party during the 1920s and 1930s.

They even awarded the Democrat candidate for President in 1924 the highest NAZI award a civilian can obtain to Henry Ford. Germany would never have been able to produce their war machine as quickly or as efficiently as they did without a great deal of help from the Democratic Party, and Henry Ford in particular. Where do you think Hitler came up with the idea that Aryan Germans were the perfect race, and their "Final Solution?" From the Democratic Party's much beloved Margaret Sanger and her eugenic ideology, of course.

Ford getting NAZI medal.jpg

FDR was included in the list of fascists because, like Mussolini, Hitler, Stalin, Mao, and Pol Pot, FDR also created concentration camps where he illegally put American citizens, stealing their property and killing tens of thousands in the process. So why would he be excluded? FDR was a well-established fascist. Only a fascist would completely replace the entire Supreme Court when they ruled against him, which is precisely what FDR did between 1937 and 1943.

I will wager that you were not even aware that the Tennessee Valley Authority, which was FDR's model for nation-wide rural electrification, included a program for the forced sterilization of "undesirables." Thankfully, the fascist FDR died before it could be implemented.

You really should have gotten an education, it would have served you better than than the very obvious leftist indoctrination you did receive.
 
Last edited:
Mussolini never stopped being a socialist. He was even personally commended for his devote socialist beliefs by Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov (a.k.a. Lenin). Which is ironic, considering it was Mussolini who personally commended FDR for his devote fascist beliefs in 1936. It was the Democrats who were in bed with the German NAZI Party during the 1920s and 1930s.

They even awarded the Democrat candidate for President in 1924 the highest NAZI award a civilian can obtain to Henry Ford. Germany would never have been able to produce their war machine as quickly or as efficiently as they did without a great deal of help from the Democratic Party, and Henry Ford in particular.

View attachment 67405441

FDR was included in the list of fascists because, like Mussolini, Hitler, Stalin, Mao, and Pol Pot, FDR also created concentration camps where he illegally put American citizens, stealing their property and killing tens of thousands in the process. So why would he be excluded? FDR was a well-established fascist. Only a fascist would completely replace the entire Supreme Court when they ruled against him, which is precisely what FDR did between 1937 and 1943.

You really should have gotten an education, it would have served you better than than the very obvious leftist indoctrination you did receive.

Uh.....yes, he absolutely did. Mussolini’s support for irredentism and Italian entry into World War One led to his expulsion from the Socialist Party, and he proceeded to immediately cut ties with them because he believed that national identity had become more important than class.......which, of course, is a principle which literally couldn’t be any LESS socialist.

It was “isolationist” CONSERVATIVES, you mean, who were in bed with the Third Reich and desperate to keep America from interfering with the Great Crusade Against Bolshevism.

Yep, conservative industrialists poured money and resources into Nazi Germany, delighted it was wiping out the “leftist filth” they hated so much.

Gee, because of the glaring obvious fact that unlike the other names on that list, FDR didn’t murder millions of innocent people? Funny how you leave out the hysterical fearmongering campaign West Coast conservatives whipped up in an effort to force FDR’s hand in the first place. Oh wait.....because that would require actual historical knowledge, and you don’t have any of that ;)

An “actual fascist” would have gotten rid of the Supreme Court altogether. Or the Justices would have mysteriously died in short order. Thanks for reminding everyone you don’t have a clue what fascism actually is.

Considering that your idea of “an education” is a series of blatant lies, as I clearly demonstrated, that’s a laugh.
 
Uh.....yes, he absolutely did. Mussolini’s support for irredentism and Italian entry into World War One led to his expulsion from the Socialist Party, and he proceeded to immediately cut ties with them because he believed that national identity had become more important than class.......which, of course, is a principle which literally couldn’t be any LESS socialist.
Mussolini stopped being the editor of socialist magazine Avante! in 1917, voluntarily, but he never stopped being a socialist. Nor was he ever expelled from the socialist party. He was recognized and commended by top socialists.

If socialism was about class and not dictatorial control over the masses, then why does every socialist State seek to have dictatorial control over the masses? You have nations like Canada that compels speech, and nations like the UK who arrest on average nine people every day for what they post online. Those are but two examples of socialist nations seeking dictatorial control over the masses. Socialism has never been about class, it is only about achieving absolute and total control.

It was “isolationist” CONSERVATIVES, you mean, who were in bed with the Third Reich and desperate to keep America from interfering with the Great Crusade Against Bolshevism.
Do you even read what you post?

Yes, conservative Republicans were very much isolationist during the 1930s. Primarily because of their bad experiences during the Banana Wars of the 1920s in Central America. Which means, as isolationists they weren't about to support any foreign government. Or do you not comprehend the meaning of "isolationist?"

Yep, conservative industrialists poured money and resources into Nazi Germany, delighted it was wiping out the “leftist filth” they hated so much.
Those so-called "conservative industrialists" were all members of the Democratic Party. The Republicans were isolationists, remember?

Gee, because of the glaring obvious fact that unlike the other names on that list, FDR didn’t murder millions of innocent people? Funny how you leave out the hysterical fearmongering campaign West Coast conservatives whipped up in an effort to force FDR’s hand in the first place. Oh wait.....because that would require actual historical knowledge, and you don’t have any of that ;)

An “actual fascist” would have gotten rid of the Supreme Court altogether. Or the Justices would have mysteriously died in short order. Thanks for reminding everyone you don’t have a clue what fascism actually is.

Considering that your idea of “an education” is a series of blatant lies, as I clearly demonstrated, that’s a laugh.
How many innocent people must someone murder to be included in your list? I draw the line at one, and FDR was directly responsible for the deaths of tens of thousands. Just like Democrat Governors Cuomo, Murphy, Wolf, and Newsom who intentionally slaughtered tens of thousands of Americans in 2020 alone. This is why all leftists continue to be filth to this very day. Nothing has changed.

FDR replaced all nine Supreme Court justices between 1937 and 1943, whether they wanted to be replaced or not. This is documented fact.
 
Last edited:
Fascism has an actual meaning bud......and you clearly have no clue what it is
I know the definition BUD. I also know what Trudeau did. No reason to suspect that he wouldnt do it again.
 
Mussolini stopped being the editor of socialist magazine Avante! in 1917, voluntarily, but he never stopped being a socialist. Nor was he ever expelled from the socialist party. He was recognized and commended by top socialists.

If socialism was about class and not dictatorial control over the masses, then why does every socialist State seek to have dictatorial control over the masses? You have nations like Canada that compels speech, and nations like the UK who arrest on average nine people every day for what they post online. Those are but two examples of socialist nations seeking dictatorial control over the masses. Socialism has never been about class, it is only about achieving absolute and total control.


Do you even read what you post?

Yes, conservative Republicans were very much isolationist during the 1930s. Primarily because of their bad experiences during the Banana Wars of the 1920s in Central America. Which means, as isolationists they weren't about to support any foreign government. Or do you not comprehend the meaning of "isolationist?"


Those so-called "conservative industrialists" were all members of the Democratic Party. The Republicans were isolationists, remember?


How many innocent people must someone murder to be included in your list? I draw the line at one, and FDR was directly responsible for the deaths of tens of thousands. Just like Democrat Governors Cuomo, Murphy, Wolf, and Newsom who intentionally slaughtered tens of thousands of Americans in 2020 alone. This is why all leftists continue to be filth to this very day. Nothing has changed.

FDR replaced all nine Supreme Court justices between 1937 and 1943, whether they wanted to be replaced or not. This is documented fact.

Uh.....what? Yes, he absolutely WAS kicked out of the Sociialist Party. Do you know ANYTHING about history?

“He resigned from Avanti! and was expelled from the Socialist Party. Financed by the French government and Italian industrialists, both of whom favoured war against Austria, he assumed the editorship of Il Popolo d’Italia (“The People of Italy”), in which he unequivocally stated his new philosophy: “From today onward we are all Italians and nothing but Italians. Now that steel has met steel, one single cry comes from our hearts—Viva l’Italia! [Long live Italy!]” It was the birth cry of fascism.”


Oh look, ANOTHER blatantly ignorant statement. No, “every socialist” does not seek to have dictatorial control over the masses. There is not and never had been freedom from consequences in any government, and no government is obligated to allow people to stir up hatred and violence with impunity, no matter how much that triggers you. That doesn’t make them “dictatorial”.

Gee bud, and yet they are dwarfed by the “home of the free”’s prison population, which rather makes your sputtering meaningless. Congrats on destroying your credibility yet AGAIN 😂

“Bad experiences”? Conservative Republicans saw NOTHING wrong with the Banana Wars. They loved the killing of “leftist filth” across Central America, and were furious that FDR stopped invading countries for their business interests. That’s why the pathetic hairbrained scheme known as the “Business Plot”— which never had the slights chance of success, and dissolved without accomplishing anything as a result— came into existence. Isolationism means they didn’t want the US to get involved.....but they had no qualms cheering on the fascists and urging them to slaughter the “leftist filth” they— and you— hate so much.

Gee bud, then by your “logic” the Libertarian Party is as bad as Pol Pot, because their rhetoric has directly lead to the deaths of more than one innocent person 😂🙄

Oh look, MORE blatant lies. You just can’t help yourself huh?

No, none of those individuals internally killed “tens of thousands of people”.

......because justices either retired or died, just like every other Supreme Court....ever. What was FDR supposed to do, leave the seats vacant because people like you threw a tantrum?
 
I know the definition BUD. I also know what Trudeau did. No reason to suspect that he wouldnt do it again.

You very clearly don’t, because if you did you wouldn’t be tossing out such a laughable accusation.
 
What our non-Californian friend FAILS to mention is that California has strong castle doctrine AND jury instructions to regard a small business essentially the same AS one's castle.
Not perfect but Colion commits a sin of omission by not mentioning it, and he also fails to mention that Newsom has never stated any intention of weakening that castle doctrine.

The store owner, or manager or whatever, broke NO California laws when he shot back.
Duly noted. Although he's very intelligent and probably tries to stay on top of gun laws in other states I think Colion may not have known that factoid. As a matter of fact he probably tries to stay as far from CA as possible lol. He did make a trip there to be on Bill Maher so there's that. Everyone should check that out if they haven't seen it. Also the "overtime" segment from that episode.
 
you can also be arrested in Canada for what you do not say.
Yep.....They COMPEL the populace to use "correct" pronouns. Its what started Jordan Peterson on his path to fame. He completely lost his shit when they started mandating that. Freedom my ass......
 
Back
Top Bottom