• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Would you vote for Palin if she ran for President?

Waiting for me to show some honesty?
You really are a dick with ears.
I'm done with your mindlessness.
 
Major Enigma said:
Waiting for me to show some honesty?
You really are a dick with ears.
I'm done with your mindlessness.
Click to expand...

Translation: I'm frustrated because my own source owned me in this discussion so I'm just going to call names and scurry off. :lol:
 
Major Enigma said:
Waiting for me to show some honesty?
You really are a dick with ears.
I'm done with your mindlessness.
Click to expand...

Moderator's Warning:
OK, let's not start going this route. The debate may be intense but, personal attacks are not acceptable.
 
Simon W. Moon said:
The part where she says, "I am a proponent of teaching both."
Click to expand...

No, the part where she says she isn't advocating it to be part of the curriculum AND the part where she says she would not pressure the board of education to offer alternatives to evolution as part of the curriculum.
 
American said:
Read Sargent Stinger's signature on every one of his posts. CC continually does zero about it. It's all talk.
Click to expand...

I gotcha.

I can see the problem, but should signatures really be censored? I'm torn on that one. It's pointless to have "repukes" in the sig line, but it isn't anything more than an advertisement of bias as it is written so its kind of a warning to others that what will be said should be taken with a grain of salt.

In that way it's beneficial.
 
Navy Pride said:
Bin Laden knows that Obama like Clinton would surrender in the war on terror..........At least under GWB he is cowering in some cave in Pakistan...........
Click to expand...
-
Seems bush surrendered to B Laden when bush said this:

2001- bush- We will hunt down Bin Laden and his gang of thugs no matter where they go. No matter what country they go in the countrys will either be with us or against us.
-
2003- bush- I don't know where B Laden is and he is no longer a priority of mine.
 
Not if my life depended on it. She sets women back decades! I cannot stand this woman. In fact, I'd gladly declare myself anti-Palin. She might make a competent Govenor, but she has no experience to become VP let alone President. I think the interview with Katie Couric speaks for itself, but if you add in the debate it's a real no brainer. She's a big no-no.

Besides, she's very hypocritcal. I hate hypocrites. My fav Palin hypocricy: she murders wolves because they're overpopulated, yet she's pro-life when humans are the most overpopulated species on the planet! So a victim of rape must keep their child when we're already so overpopulated and the poor child would most likely live a miserable life as would the mother? Dumb!
 
Simon W. Moon said:
The part where she says, "I am a proponent of teaching both."
Click to expand...

jallman said:
No, the part where she says she isn't advocating it to be part of the curriculum AND the part where she says she would not pressure the board of education to offer alternatives to evolution as part of the curriculum.
Click to expand...

Sounds like double-speak to me.
 
jallman said:
How so? It's pretty straightforward. Can't get any clearer without drawing a picture.
Click to expand...

What do you mean how so?

She said she want to teach both. But then says she doesn't want to push any legislation that would make schools teach both.

How is that not double-speak?
 
Lightdemon said:
What do you mean how so?
Click to expand...

Just what I asked. How so?

She said she want to teach both. But then says she doesn't want to push any legislation that would make schools teach both.
Click to expand...

So what's the problem? She wouldn't mind it but wouldn't press that personal belief on anyone else. Seems pretty straighforward to me.

How is that not double-speak?
Click to expand...

Because it's not.
 
jallman said:
So what's the problem? She wouldn't mind it but wouldn't press that personal belief on anyone else. Seems pretty straighforward to me.
Click to expand...

Did she say that "she wouldn't mind?" I don't believe those are her words.

I am a proponent of teaching both, was her actual words. Yet, does the contrary.

Because it's not.
Click to expand...

Yea, clearly. :roll:
 
I wold never vote for her. Not because she's just not ready, but because Palin and I see things very differently on many things.
If somebody held a gun to my head and said I had to vote for a Republican, I'd write Ron Paul's name on the ballot.
 
Heck no there is no way I would vote for palin if she ran for president. First off she is nowhere near qualified enough for president. VP most definatley.
 
Lightdemon said:
Did she say that "she wouldn't mind?" I don't believe those are her words.

I am a proponent of teaching both, was her actual words. Yet, does the contrary.



Yea, clearly. :roll:
Click to expand...

Yet, she's done nothing to promote the idea of teaching both because...guess what? She doesn't care. She cares about pipelines and a budget that runs with a surplus. She isn't interested in making sure your bebehz have sunday school class every day of the week no matter how hard you, Moony, and any others try to spin it as such.
 
If the democratic candidate was Obama I would definitely vote for Palin......She is more qualified then he is to be president......
 
jallman said:
Yet, she's done nothing to promote the idea of teaching both because...guess what? She doesn't care.
Click to expand...

You're right, it probably isn't double-speak then. It's just pandering for votes.
 
Navy Pride said:
If the democratic candidate was Obama I would definitely vote for Palin......She is more qualified then he is to be president......
Click to expand...

-
Hear YE, Hear Ye, More :bs from NP!
Talk about not being able to think for yourself this proves NP you are NOT a Repub you are a DEM Hater! There is a difference you know!
-
Now don't run away like you always do, PROVE to me how Palin is more qualified then Obama!
Is it because she was a Mayor with 9,000 residents?
Or because she has '2' Ya, 'TWO' less years being Gov that Obama?
-
Good old NP!!!
:2funny::2rofll::2rofll::2funny:
 
Sergeant Stinger1 said:
-
Hear YE, Hear Ye, More :bs from NP!
Talk about not being able to think for yourself this proves NP you are NOT a Repub you are a DEM Hater! There is a difference you know!
-
Now don't run away like you always do, PROVE to me how Palin is more qualified then Obama!
Is it because she was a Mayor with 9,000 residents?
Or because she has '2' Ya, 'TWO' less years being Gov that Obama?
-
Good old NP!!!
:2funny::2rofll::2rofll::2funny:
Click to expand...

In your ranting ad raving your right about one thing my left wing friend......I am not a Republican........

Tell me what anagement experience does your boy Obama have?
 
Last edited:
Navy Pride said:
I think most Muslim and Arab countries in the world are pulling for Obama to win.........I am sure Bin Laden is............
Click to expand...

I think I heard on the news today that AQ had endorsed McCain.

:mrgreen:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom