- Joined
- Oct 18, 2007
- Messages
- 31,346
- Reaction score
- 19,892
- Location
- East Coast - USA
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Centrist
I'm sorry, but I have trouble believing that this is even a serious question. I personally find the idea absurd, at best, that someone would be that disturbed by the idea of gay marriage.
Are you so against the idea of SSM becoming socially acceptable that you'd end your marriage so you wouldn't have to share the name "marriage" with a gay couple?
As a form of protest - how far would you go to not have to share the same word?
Or could you just accept it, albeit begrudgingly?
Are you so against the idea of SSM becoming socially acceptable that you'd end your marriage so you wouldn't have to share the name "marriage" with a gay couple?
As a form of protest - how far would you go to not have to share the same word?
Or could you just accept it, albeit begrudgingly?
Papa Bull....you may want to switch to decaf. What exactly is your issue here? Are going to impose all the other rules of your religion on us too? Or just the ones the protect you from the things you fear because you don't understand them?
I'm sorry, but I have trouble believing that this is even a serious question. I personally find the idea absurd, at best, that someone would be that disturbed by the idea of gay marriage.
I wonder if the commie pinkos that scream bloody murder over rich people taking tax deductions refuse to take their own deductions as a form of protest? I wonder how far they would go to show their hatred for rich people. Or would they just claim their deductions, albeit begrudgingly?
Why not? There are couples that refuse to get married until it's legal for everyone.
I wonder if the commie pinkos that scream bloody murder over rich people taking tax deductions refuse to take their own deductions as a form of protest? I wonder how far they would go to show their hatred for rich people. Or would they just claim their deductions, albeit begrudgingly?
As some one with libertarian leanings if be fine with no legal marriage .
I have a conservative grandfather who will not take medicare because he thinks it is stealing from the system. It is OK, he is stupid and will die soon because of it.
I have a conservative grandfather who will not take medicare because he thinks it is stealing from the system. It is OK, he is stupid and will die soon because of it.
And this pertains how?
If I had any doubts about the quality of your character, this statement certainly put them to rest. :doh
Some people will go to extremes over their views, and cut their own noses off to spite their faces.
Are you married?
If I had any real care about your opinion of my character I might actually be concerned with this irrelevance.
To me, there's a significant difference between someone who is planning to get married (and abstaining based on principle), and someone who is already married, and would consider dissolving that marriage relationship, based on opposition to a change in the legal status of gay marriage. To me, it's more about the relationship than the paper or legal status.
Are you so against the idea of SSM becoming socially acceptable that you'd end your marriage so you wouldn't have to share the name "marriage" with a gay couple?
As a form of protest - how far would you go to not have to share the same word?
Or could you just accept it, albeit begrudgingly?
Could you point to the commie who objects to the marriage deduction?..
You would have to be able to define character, and perhaps possess some small shred of it, to understand why what you said was so wrong.
So nevermind...
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?