ThePlayDrive
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2011
- Messages
- 19,610
- Reaction score
- 7,647
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Abuse was ruled out in 35 cases. Seventy-four children were allegedly abused by other children and teenagers less than 18 years old. In 9 cases, an offender could not be identified. In the remaining 269 cases, two offenders were identified as being gay or lesbian. In 82% of cases (222/269), the alleged offender was a heterosexual partner of a close relative of the child.
All regressed offenders, whether their victims were male or female children, were heterosexual in their adult orientation. There were no examples of regression to child victims among peer-oriented, homosexual males. The possibility emerges that homosexuality and homosexual pedophilia may be mutually exclusive and that the adult heterosexual male constitutes a greater risk to the underage child than does the adult homosexual male.
I would never allow my child to be around heterosexuals. Also, heterosexuals should not be allowed to have children.
Why? Because studies show that most children who become gay are the children of heterosexual parents.
Here, there.
I would never allow my child to be around heterosexuals. Also, heterosexuals should not be allowed to have children.
Why? Because studies show that most children who become gay are the children of heterosexual parents.
Here, there.
Deja vu....all over again
With that in mind, it may be more safe for our sons if we remove all heterosexual males from camps and groups like the Boy Scouts and fill them with flaming homosexuals since the former appear to be exceedingly more likely to sexually abuse young children. Do you agree? Would you send your son to camp with heterosexual men given these alarming statistics?
Only if they aren't "openly heterosexual".
According to a study from 1993 by Dr. Carole Jenny, in 82% of sexual abuse cases studied during her research, the alleged offender was a heterosexual partner of a close relative of the child. Here is a quote from the abstract:
Another study, from 1975, by Dr. Nicholas Groth studied a random group of 175 males convicted of sexual assault against children[FONT=arial, helvetica, clean, sans-serif]. [/FONT]The study showed the following:
With that in mind, it may be more safe for our sons if we remove all heterosexual males from camps and groups like the Boy Scouts and fill them with flaming homosexuals since the former appear to be exceedingly more likely to sexually abuse young children. Do you agree? Would you send your son to camp with heterosexual men given these alarming statistics?
Alright, now I need to speak up for heteros. 175 isn't much of a sample size. John Wayne Gacy and Jeffrey Dahmer were most decidedly not heterosexual (but a 1975 study might be before their time). There's no question in my mind that there are many more hetero predators (and serial killers) but I'd bet that the percentages within the respective populations are similar.
Alright, now I need to speak up for heteros. 175 isn't much of a sample size. John Wayne Gacy and Jeffrey Dahmer were most decidedly not heterosexual (but a 1975 study might be before their time). There's no question in my mind that there are many more hetero predators (and serial killers) but I'd bet that the percentages within the respective populations are similar.
Dude.
Stop taking this thread seriously.
Dude, srsly. That was like the most hilariously bad nonsequitor, badly assumed with no data, logical fail, non refutation ever.
According to a study from 1993 by Dr. Carole Jenny, in 82% of sexual abuse cases studied during her research, the alleged offender was a heterosexual partner of a close relative of the child. Here is a quote from the abstract:
Another study, from 1975, by Dr. Nicholas Groth studied a random group of 175 males convicted of sexual assault against children[FONT=arial, helvetica, clean, sans-serif]. [/FONT]The study showed the following:
With that in mind, it may be more safe for our sons if we remove all heterosexual males from camps and groups like the Boy Scouts and fill them with flaming homosexuals since the former appear to be exceedingly more likely to sexually abuse young children. Do you agree? Would you send your son to camp with heterosexual men given these alarming statistics?
No, you misunderstand sexuality. Pedophilia is a mental disorder which is SEPARATE from a regular sexuality like homosexuality, heterosexuality and bisexuality. Therefore, a male pedophile who abuses young boys can CERTAINLY be a heterosexual man.I don't see how one could be called heterosexual if they are raping young boys... they are bisexual at least.
No, you misunderstand sexuality. Pedophilia is a mental disorder which is SEPARATE from a regular sexuality like homosexuality, heterosexuality and bisexuality. Therefore, a male pedophile who abuses young boys can CERTAINLY be a heterosexual man.
According to a study from 1993 by Dr. Carole Jenny, in 82% of sexual abuse cases studied during her research, the alleged offender was a heterosexual partner of a close relative of the child. Here is a quote from the abstract:
Another study, from 1975, by Dr. Nicholas Groth studied a random group of 175 males convicted of sexual assault against children[FONT=arial, helvetica, clean, sans-serif]. [/FONT]The study showed the following:
With that in mind, it may be more safe for our sons if we remove all heterosexual males from camps and groups like the Boy Scouts and fill them with flaming homosexuals since the former appear to be exceedingly more likely to sexually abuse young children. Do you agree? Would you send your son to camp with heterosexual men given these alarming statistics?
First, this is in reference to the true definition of paedophilia; sexual attraction to pre-pubescent children. Attraction to post-pubescent children is a different issue.I don't think I agree to be honest. I am sure a lot of people classify it the way you are. If a male is attracted to another person of the male sex, they are homosexual at least partially.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?