• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Would going back to the gold standard work?

Would going back to the gold standard work?


  • Total voters
    24
  • Poll closed .

polisciguy

Active member
Joined
Mar 18, 2013
Messages
396
Reaction score
133
Location
Virginia
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Moderate
Explain your answer as well, please.
 

Morrigi

Active member
Joined
Jul 5, 2013
Messages
351
Reaction score
124
Location
IL
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian
The only thing keeping the world from doing so is America. Nixon basically told everyone and their gold to collectively **** off and it's gotten worse from there. In fact, countries attempting to base their currencies and/or exports off of anything aside from the U.S. Dollar are having a growing pattern of their plans being....terminated. Especially in the Middle East.

So going back to the gold standard would work, but the U.S. would have to drastically change their policy and/or lose the military might to back its current one up.
 

Jango

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Feb 16, 2012
Messages
5,587
Reaction score
2,291
Location
Michigan
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian - Left
Is there even enough to compensate for the amount of currency floating around? And, would going back to the gold standard result in confiscation and/or forced buy backs?
 

specklebang

Discount Philosopher
DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 13, 2012
Messages
11,524
Reaction score
6,769
Location
Las Vegas
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Other
Not a chance. If you back your money with gold, you have to have the gold. If you back your money with some sort of imaginary interest in the economy, you can print what you need when you need it.
 

Grand Mal

Russian warship, go f*** yourself!
DP Veteran
Joined
May 6, 2013
Messages
47,280
Reaction score
28,712
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Liberal
Only if you want to pay all your debts in gold.
 

Captain Adverse

Classical Liberal Sage
DP Veteran
Joined
Jun 22, 2013
Messages
18,968
Reaction score
25,119
Location
Mid-West USA
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Other
I put "maybe/other" because I support a "precious metal" standard. Gold would be the prime metal, but silver and platinum would have replacement values so we would never run out of gold to back our money.

Dollars would only be issued on the amount of gold we had in stock to back each one, which means it would always have intrinsic value and people would not lose faith in it. This also reduces inflation because a finite amount of cash in the economic system increases it's value, whereas an unlimited amount results in inflation.

Fiat cash only benefits investment banks, and corporate borrowers; keeping the wealthy happy and the common citizen less so. That's my two cents anyway. :twocents:
 

Helix

Administrator
Moderator
DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 1, 2011
Messages
84,120
Reaction score
74,986
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
my guess is no.

part of me is enamored with the idea, but i think there's no putting that genie back into the bottle.
 

Captain Adverse

Classical Liberal Sage
DP Veteran
Joined
Jun 22, 2013
Messages
18,968
Reaction score
25,119
Location
Mid-West USA
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Other
my guess is no.

part of me is enamored with the idea, but i think there's no putting that genie back into the bottle.

Awww come-on! Join us on the Light-side of the Force. You know you want to...avoid the Dark-side. :darthgunny ;)
 

earthworm

DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 21, 2005
Messages
5,728
Reaction score
904
Location
Goldsboro,PA
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Progressive
NO
This is opinion based, as I have not all the necessary knowledge.
By rights, I should not have voted.....but...
I feel that the original decision, back in the previous century was good and necessary.
Simply stated, we did not begin to have that much gold....so we had to use a "faith based" paper standard.
Reverting will not work today..
What we need is a better people....
 
Last edited:

specklebang

Discount Philosopher
DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 13, 2012
Messages
11,524
Reaction score
6,769
Location
Las Vegas
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Other
This is opinion based, as I have not all the necessary knowledge.
By rights, I should not have voted.....but...
I feel that the original decision, back in the previous century was good and necessary.
Simply stated, we did not begin to have that much gold....so we had to use a "faith based" paper standard.
Reverting will not work today..
What we need is a better people....

...or stronger faith.
 

Gipper

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Feb 6, 2008
Messages
25,116
Reaction score
7,658
Location
Theoretical Physics Lab
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian - Right
America would have to become fiscally responsible overnight. Good luck with that.
 

Arbo

DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 4, 2011
Messages
10,395
Reaction score
2,744
Location
Colorado
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
Well, money based on NOTHING has certainly done wonders for our nation.... :roll:

What an utterly stupid idea... Just one of the many things the founders did not want the government in control of... and yet again we find ourselves in that bad spot.
 

Ikari

Moderator
DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 8, 2006
Messages
87,197
Reaction score
57,542
Location
Colorado
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian - Left
Explain your answer as well, please.

No, not in today's global economy. The market on gold would be too easily cornered and you would leave the value of your currency vulnerable to the whims and pit falls of the market. It's a great idea, when things were well more isolated it was likely the better way to go. But currency is a major part of sovereignty and therefore a sovereign State needs control of the value of the currency. As such in today's global economy, fiat currency is an unfortunate necessity. It does mean you'll need transparency and control of government, and of course any organization that prints and regulates the value of our dollar is directly controlled and owned by Congress.

That being said, I wouldn't be opposed to allowing a competing, metal backed currency. But the official currency of the US would need to be the fiat dollar.
 

Sherman123

DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 5, 2012
Messages
7,774
Reaction score
3,791
Location
Northeast US
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
I'm actually remarkably unconcerned about having a fiat currency.
 

Redress

Liberal Fascist For Life!
DP Veteran
Joined
Mar 5, 2008
Messages
111,448
Reaction score
57,708
Location
Bradenton Fla
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Very Liberal
Explain your answer as well, please.

Define "work". If you mean would it function as designed, sure. If you mean is it desirable in comparison to fiat currency, then clearly no. No only would it leave us vulnerable to people manipulating the supply of gold, it would also leave us with fewer options to react to economic effects on the country.
 

Arbo

DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 4, 2011
Messages
10,395
Reaction score
2,744
Location
Colorado
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
No only would it leave us vulnerable to people manipulating the supply of gold,

As if 'people' and 'government' haven't been manipulating our fiat currency for decades? How hard has it been for them?
 

Ikari

Moderator
DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 8, 2006
Messages
87,197
Reaction score
57,542
Location
Colorado
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian - Left
As if 'people' and 'government' haven't been manipulating our fiat currency for decades? How hard has it been for them?

It's not. That's why you need a large amount of transparency with fiat currency. The problem is that the available population of people able to significantly influence the value of your currency increases drastically with a metal backed currency compared to that of fiat.
 

Ikari

Moderator
DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 8, 2006
Messages
87,197
Reaction score
57,542
Location
Colorado
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian - Left
Sorry, but such a belief is ignorant of both history and current fed 'pumping' ...

It's not hard for the fed and Wells Fargo to mess with our fiat currency? I believe that you're the one who is quite ignorant on the matter.
 

Mr.Nick

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 25, 2012
Messages
7,908
Reaction score
1,764
Location
Chicago
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian
It be difficult but it would work.... Obviously it would be an extremely slow transition, but it would certainly work without question.
 

Arbo

DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 4, 2011
Messages
10,395
Reaction score
2,744
Location
Colorado
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
It's not hard for the fed and Wells Fargo to mess with our fiat currency? I believe that you're the one who is quite ignorant on the matter.

You were agreeing with me, I misread.
 

Redress

Liberal Fascist For Life!
DP Veteran
Joined
Mar 5, 2008
Messages
111,448
Reaction score
57,708
Location
Bradenton Fla
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Very Liberal
As if 'people' and 'government' haven't been manipulating our fiat currency for decades? How hard has it been for them?

Our government doing it for our benefit is not a bad thing. There is a significant difference in the level of vulnerability between a gold standard and a fiat currency. And of course you ignored an important part of what I wrote.
 

Arbo

DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 4, 2011
Messages
10,395
Reaction score
2,744
Location
Colorado
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
Our government doing it for our benefit

You (and so many others here) need say no more. Thanks, it says all anyone needs to know.
 
Top Bottom