- Joined
- Jan 24, 2013
- Messages
- 15,633
- Reaction score
- 6,159
- Location
- Behind the Orange Curtain
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Very Conservative
We've already had at least one woman pass the Q Course. If they can cut it without the standards being lowered, then what's the huge deal?
We've already had at least one woman pass the Q Course. If they can cut it without the standards being lowered, then what's the huge deal?
Prediction: The rape cases will increase...again.
Perhaps a history lesson is in order or you ladies and gentlemen can keep ignoring basic human nature. Whatever.
There going to lower the standards, you can bet on it.
Back in 2009 they (Obama) lowered the academic standards for minorities who wanted to apply for our military service academies.
The Pentagon has already said that they would lower the physical standards for all combat arms in the Army so more women would qualify.
That's what liberal social engineering is all about, dumbing things down.
Wow. You really are showing that you think men have no self-control and are basically animalistic. Really sad dude.
I wasn't aware that having breasts and a vagina inhibited someone's performance during combat...
You just have to know the beast you are dealing with and ask yourself if these ladies are safe. The answer is not good. I highly doubt men that go to war have really changed over the centuries to make this possible now without rape being out of control.
Prediction: The rape cases will increase...again.
Perhaps a history lesson is in order or you ladies and gentlemen can keep ignoring basic human nature. Whatever.
Like I said, you are assuming that men are just animals.
I think that the women could protect themselves, seeing as how they'd have just as much training as the guys.
Big chest are always getting in the way when trying to crawl under the wire on an infiltration course.
Do they still fire live machinegun fire about three feet above the ground on the infiltration course or did they dumb down that course too ?
Basic human nature is to rape?
Well, I am assuming since we are civilized humans we can expect that rape is not expected or tolerated behavior.
The amount of women that get in will not be anywhere near enough to counterbalance the problem by women banding together to protect themselves. As for just protecting themselves in general, you're completely joking with that, right? Women will not be able to protect themselves on average from rape just like they can't on average anywhere else. Since military bases are gun free zones more and more often these days, well, that just makes their chances worse.
Big chest are always getting in the way when trying to crawl under the wire on an infiltration course.
I am hoping it is not only women that will stand against women being raped. Real men would stand against rape.
So will a beer belly. That's a spectacularly stupid argument to make.
Yes we will. And it says a lot about certain allegedly pro-military people that they think so little of our soldiers as to assume that they're somehow less
in control of themselves than other men. That's a disservice to our soldiers.
Lol, how many of these men have beer bellies?
Look at the damn stats and the history of women in military service. It's not exactly news to say rape is a serious problem in the military when women are invited. Every time throughout history the same thing happens whenever the military invites women. Go ahead and look it up if you want.
Is it not true that one in four women get sexually assaulted? Is it not also true that the rape rate is higher in the military? Yes, rape is part of our nature and I have no doubt in the situations the miltary men find themselves in it is a serious risk of occurring regularly.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?