• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Wisconsin GOP Will Run Fake Democrats to Buy Time

I'm confused...why would the senate leader openly say "hey, we're gonna screw with everybody"?
 
It's counter-intuitive, isn' it?

It doesn't make any sense, that's for sure. I don't put shady tactics above any politician, but it is absolutely illogical to explain your shady behavior right before you're going into a primary election/general election. Something ain't right.
 
It doesn't make any sense, that's for sure. I don't put shady tactics above any politician, but it is absolutely illogical to explain your shady behavior right before you're going into a primary election/general election. Something ain't right.

The Wisconsin paper uses two sources, the senate president and another senate Republican.
 
From the link in the article the OP links to...

Mixed signals it seems. If this is true, it's stupid and unethical... just like it was when the Democrats tried it...

» The Left’s Hypocrisy On ‘Fake Candidates’ In Wisconsin - Big Government
 
I'm confused...why would the senate leader openly say "hey, we're gonna screw with everybody"?

It's known as hubris. It's the same thing that ensured that there would be a record 6 Republicans facing recalls. It's relatively rare to even have 1 recall because of the monumental effort it takes.
 

It's kind of hard to tell who is a "Tea party" candidate and who isn't since all the Tea Party candidates and representatives run around claiming that the others just aren't "right-wing" enough.
 
It's kind of hard to tell who is a "Tea party" candidate and who isn't since all the Tea Party candidates and representatives run around claiming that the others just aren't "right-wing" enough.

How do you define who is a "true" Tea Party candidate anyway? I thought this was a grass roots movement defined from the bottom up. Can't basically anyone define themselves as "Tea Party?"

And how does one become a Tea Party candidate as it is? Is there a nominating process?

Referencing a "fake" Tea Partier in the Congressional race in question just reminds me of the liberals who blamed Ralph Nader for Al Gore losing. OK, the Conservative vote was split. But nothing I've read indicates Jack Davis is a fraud, just that he has disagreements with the Republican party. Calling him a "fake" seems like the GOP trying to make sure that they corner the Tea Party vote.

Interesting article about him here: NY 26: Jack Davis and the Tea Party vs. Jane Corwin and the Republican Party. - By David Weigel - Slate Magazine
 
rocket... do you plan on showing the same level of disdain for the Wisconcin Democrats that tried to do the same thing (see previous post)?
 
rocket... do you plan on showing the same level of disdain for the Wisconcin Democrats that tried to do the same thing (see previous post)?

Well what I said was that I have disdain for electoral politics in which people are more concerned with their party winning. If I could go back in time and show "the same level of disdain" last summer, I would. But that's past.

I also questioned the assertion that Jack Davis was a "fake" Tea Party candidate. If you ask me, the Republicans have completely hijacked the Tea Party movement.
 

I don't really follow the Tea Party stuff myself, so I have no idea about that. Pleased to hear that your disdain on the fake candidates goes both ways though.
 
I want to see documented proof because as has been shown in the past this is Democrat tactic, and it would be no surprise to find it's just another false flag operation, accuse the opposition of what ever you are doing and the rest of the party swear to it.
 
It doesn't make any sense, that's for sure. I don't put shady tactics above any politician, but it is absolutely illogical to explain your shady behavior right before you're going into a primary election/general election. Something ain't right.

The republicans claim, and I would tend to believe them, that they are just doing it in order to delay the vote.

By causing a primary, they are buying themselves some time to campaign, since they are currently stuck at the capitol and can't campaign in their districts.

 
Last edited:

Seems counterproductive to do something like this if you're trying to win reelection. People are going to take it as a slap in the face that you "attacked unions" and then spent state money on a farce just so you can go shake a few hands and kiss a few babies.
 

I personally see no issue with it, but it could potentially cause a backlash. It would seem rather unfair to have an election in which one side can't campaign at all because they're stuck back at the capitol doing the state's business.

From what I understand, the cost will be $500k. I guess it's up to the individual to determine if that's a lot or not.
 
Last edited:
I also questioned the assertion that Jack Davis was a "fake" Tea Party candidate. If you ask me, the Republicans have completely hijacked the Tea Party movement.

There is quite a bit of mixed up assumptions within this statement. Davis ran as a Democrat on 2 separate occasions for the exact same seat. He was actively recruited by Democrats to run as a "tea party" candidate.

Most of the ideas and concepts within the tea party are libertarian and conservative in nature, their ideology doesnt match well with current Democrat thinking.

Lastly, the GOP has not hijacked the Tea Party, the Tea Party is in the process of hijacking the GOP. The GOP establishment is just as threatened by various endorsed Tea Party candidates as the Democrats are. The Tea Party is holding the GOP accountable more than any other group through serious primary competition.

As to the rest, its not illegal but its damn sure unethical.
 

Davis wasn't allowed to run as a Republican because the incumbent was a Republican. He was also pro-choice and against the war in Iraq, neither position endeared him to the Republicans of the time. Other than those positions, he was not a Democrat. The Democrats let him run on their ticket because he was willing to do so on his own dime, and nobody that actually was a Democrat was excited about being the sacrifice in a gerrymandered district that stretched halfway across New York State. The Tea Party also did not exist then for him to run on their ticket.
 

Hes a one issue candidate--free trade. GOP doesnt like him, Tea Party doesnt like him, he should run as an independent and quit trying to claim hes something hes not.

Jack Davis, Self-Proclaimed Tea Party Candidate, Backed Obama in 2008 - By Jim Geraghty - The Campaign Spot - National Review Online
Republican, tea party movement figures attack Davis - Politics - The Buffalo News
Tea Party Express Calls Jack Davis a Fraud : Roll Call Politics

He gave Hochul the race more or less. Oh, yeah he took campaign contributions from Obama and Rangel. Still think hes got any serious links to the GOP? Geesh.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…