Just when you thought Al Sharpton and Jessie Jackson couldn't incite racism to a higher level than they already have, along came this common sense plan called segregation; a fool proof method to prevent racism at any level.
I don't think segregation is racism IF the it just happens, what I mean is places like Little Italy in NYC is mostly white, China Town mostly Chinese. Now this happens because people wanted to live with others like them nothing wrong with that. If you force segregation that is wrong.
I hope I said this clear enough.
You did. You can't force people to live where they don't want to live. If African American nationalists want to go make a "homeland" somewhere in Ethiopia for blacks only. Let them go ahead I'm staying right here in the U.S. of A. Same goes for white nationalists. All these people who want to divide America into different regions based on race should either pony up enough money to buy land or stfu and learn to stop being racist.
You got it.
If African American nationalists want to go make a "homeland" somewhere in Ethiopia for blacks only.
It was my distinct impression that this experiment had already been tried.
Liberia...?
Notable supporters of transporting freed blacks to Liberia included Henry Clay, Francis Scott Key, Bushrod Washington, and the architect of the U.S. Capitol, William Thornton—all slave owners. These "moderates" thought slavery was unsustainable and should eventually end but did not consider integrating slaves into society a viable option. So, the ACS encouraged slaveholders to offer freedom on the condition that those accepting it would move to Liberia at the society's expense. A number of slave owners did just that.
The colonization effort resulted from a mixture of motives. Free blacks, freedmen and their descendants, encountered widespread discrimination in the United States of the early 19th century. They were generally perceived as a burden on society, and a threat to white workers because they undercut wages. Some abolitionists believed that blacks could not achieve equality in the United States and would be better off in Africa. Many slaveholders were worried that the presence of free blacks would encourage slaves to rebel. Other supporters of removal to Africa wanted to prevent racial mixing, to promote the spread of Christianity in Africa, or to develop trade with Africa.[1][2]
Just when you thought Al Sharpton and Jessie Jackson couldn't incite racism to a higher level than they already have, along came this common sense plan called segregation; a fool proof method to prevent racism at any level.
You...are...not...a...real...person
Go...away...troll
This is a recording.
Just when you thought Al Sharpton and Jessie Jackson couldn't incite racism to a higher level than they already have, along came this common sense plan called segregation; a fool proof method to prevent racism at any level.
Keeping people in separate racial groups only fuels racism.Only a fu<ken retard actually thinks segregation doesn't fuel racism.You don't think forcing people to be separated into racial groups won't fuel some kind of resentment/hatred towards other races and ignorant perception about other races?
I got Goobie on speed dial just in case a scenario like that ever happens. I also got him on speed dial just in case I ever have to defend the American Mexican border from Vermont but thats a whole different deal.
Just when you thought Al Sharpton and Jessie Jackson couldn't incite racism to a higher level than they already have, along came this common sense plan called segregation; a fool proof method to prevent racism at any level.
Just when you thought Al Sharpton and Jessie Jackson couldn't incite racism to a higher level than they already have, along came this common sense plan called segregation; a fool proof method to prevent racism at any level.
Guys, if you don't feed the troll, it will eventually go away.
Hmm, what do you mean? Are you from Vermont?
We tried that one, Kandy. I've known this guy for a long, long time, and the only logical conclusion I can possibly draw about him is extreme: That he's not trolling.
Duke
I'm almost 100% sure that he is. He gave himself away in the thread "Does anyone here work?" with his inane question. No real person - no matter how stupid they were - would say something so blatantly troll-like.
What would be his agenda, though, with that question?
Many threads in the "off-topic" section have a disingenuous question as a title: "Does anyone here listen to music?", etc. Most of them seem compelled by little more than idle curiosity.
Don't trolls usually have an agenda?
(Not to suggest he's not a troll; I tend to agree with you that he is one. But that thread in particular was not the deciding factor for me. Rather, his rhetorical polls, and combative and belligerent stances in any number of threads he's started).
Right@NYU had a thesis that he was a liberal plant put here to make Conservatives look like idiots.
Quite the opposite, really. In a city or town with only one race, one would expect all other races would be viewed as inferior. In the short term, this would not make much of a difference, but as we know, such segregation doesn't last forever.
Say PTSD, been reading a few too many David Duke books? You remind me of him.
Duke
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?