Will Segregation Prevent Racism?

[Hatuey]

Notice, kid? Everyone else has, mostly left the thread, to enjoy, once again, watching the show of you and I battling it out...waiting, as usual, for me create a memorable post reducing your arguments to little more then a group of withering, broken leaves, dancing aimlessly along a dusty, lonely road in some nondescript town in the middle of nowhere...dancing without purpose, waiting for some spiritual leaf blower to guide them to the universal city dump.

So as not to leave the masses unfulfilled, I will continue...



This is true. My choice, however, was to choose to not involve myself in something personal that I had no place in. Anyway, I find demolishing your arguments far more entertaining.



Now this is where you begin to lose touch with what's actually occurring here, and in many of your threads. One reason that many of the threads you start don't go to the Basement is because I rescue them from the meandering, pointless place they are heading. I revive them and create an interesting and relevant discussion out of something that resembles nothing more than unsubstantiated rhetoric. You should be thanking me for saving your threads and allowing them to further into good debate. Instead, you, quite inaccurately, accuse me of negatively affecting your threads, when I revive them from the quick death they are heading towards. No gratitude at all. I'm appalled.



No ptsdkid in DP = reasonable decorum. Hmmm...you said this. Are you saying that DP would be better of without you? Perhaps we should take a poll...:2razz:



Have you forgotten the theme of this thread? I believe it's about segregation and racism, and how segregation prevents that...in your opinion. Now try to follow, kid. You have claimed to be one who supports segregation. You have stated how mulitculturalism hurts society. Hence in order to live a happy life, you chose to live the life of a segregationalist, avoiding multiculturalists. These are your claims. My question is pertinent to this: why, as a segregationalist, would you participate in a community filled with multiculturalists, people who can harm your way of life? Isn't this contrary to the segregationalist belief system? And if so, wouldn't you do better in a segregated community?



And yet, no one is listening. We live a healthy and happy lifestyle without any of your tenets, tenets that are incompatible with that lifestyle for most. You've failed, kid. And yet, this seems to surprise you.



Now here is the irrelevance and non-congruence of your position: you assume that these things you say to be accurate and facts. And yet, as has been proven countless times, by many, many, many, you are unable to substantiate these personal opinions of yours. In fact, last summer you were given 24 hours to come up with substantiation for just one of your positions. I judged that contest. Remember, kid? You were unable to do that. It was then that the beginning of your complete failure began.



You see? Just when I think you've become completely hopeless, you make a statement that makes a modicum of sense. It is always startling when we agree.



But kid, the ease of your destruction in this thread alone has me concerned. Often this endeavor can be quite creative and entertaining. Yet, here, you slipped into posting quite obvious errors in facts. Your arguments were reduced to rubble even before I had the opportunity to destroy them. Most disheartening. Perhaps all this mixing with multiculturalists has been effecting you more then you believe.



I am aware of this completely...and this is my point. You are in this multiculturalist community, something non-analogous to the segregationalist belief system. This could compromise your standing in that community if this ever got out. You could get excommunicated, kid. It is confusing as to why one who abhors multiculturalists would choose to be in a community with them. It is inconsistent with your beliefs.



But no one here is complaining about being unhappy because of not being a segregationalist. If this is the basis of your argument, it folds completely at its foundation. And remember, without a foundation, the entire building folds. I'm sure you get the analogy.



Kid, I think it's time for you to do some personal self-evaluation. Opening up one's mind can create knowledge expansion. I would be happy to guide you in this, as it is obvious that your beliefs and actions are at war with themselves. Being at war with oneself can be quite distressing, but I'm certain I can point you in the right direction in order correct this problem. No need to thank me now. Your continued growth is thanks enough.

This entire post had me laughing. I pretty much stopped work to read this. Your ability to brutally destroy pstdkids arguments never ceases to amaze me. Honestly it never fails. :2wave:

 

[CaptainCourtesy]

This entire post had me laughing. I pretty much stopped work to read this. Your ability to brutally destroy pstdkids arguments never ceases to amaze me. Honestly it never fails. :2wave:

Ah yes, my readers are satisfied, the masses fulfilled. My work is done here...for now, though my fight against tyranny and extremism, and for truth, justice, and the CaptainCourtesy way will never cease. My services are needed elsewhere, for the time being, as I sense a disturbance in the force over in the Breaking News Forum.

 

[ptsdkid]

Notice, kid? Everyone else has, mostly left the thread, to enjoy, once again, watching the show of you and I battling it out...waiting, as usual, for me create a memorable post reducing your arguments to little more then a group of withering, broken leaves, dancing aimlessly along a dusty, lonely road in some nondescript town in the middle of nowhere...dancing without purpose, waiting for some spiritual leaf blower to guide them to the universal city dump.


***Reducing my arguments to little more then a group of withering, broken leaves, dancing aimlessly along a dusty, lonely road in some nondescript town? I've noticed that much of your discourse here relies upon fiction writings of say a Walt Witman, a Robert Frost, or perhaps from a John Greenleaf Whittier. The very concept of liberal powwow has always had that Orwellian touch with just enough seasoned flavor of a maddened Noam Chompski to make it the slightest bit interesting. Once again, thanks for beautifully representing your side of the ledger.



This is true. My choice, however, was to choose to not involve myself in something personal that I had no place in. Anyway, I find demolishing your arguments far more entertaining.

***For someone choosing not to get involved--you sure did manage to hurt the multicultural cause by giving those who choose to live in a racist society (the multiculturalists), the option to stay silent with their racially incongruent living choice. Furthermore, you've given others the perfect escape hatch in that they won't feel as pressured from me to show or to give examples of racism in a segregated community. For as you and I know, it would be quite a stretch to show or to prove racial tension on an Indian reservation, in an Amish neighborhood, in Watts, in Harlem, in my gated community, or on my cousin's extremly segregated island. Funny that we never got you to comment on these very important factors, which I might add--go directly to the heart of the original question of "Will Segregation Prevent Racism". Oh, that's right too--you're overly stated position here is to try in vain to demolish my arguments. Well Capt, you could start by demolishing the very points made in this very paragraph....that is if your anomalous sleep schedule allows you that pleasure.



Now this is where you begin to lose touch with what's actually occurring here, and in many of your threads. One reason that many of the threads you start don't go to the Basement is because I rescue them from the meandering, pointless place they are heading. I revive them and create an interesting and relevant discussion out of something that resembles nothing more than unsubstantiated rhetoric. You should be thanking me for saving your threads and allowing them to further into good debate. Instead, you, quite inaccurately, accuse me of negatively affecting your threads, when I revive them from the quick death they are heading towards. No gratitude at all. I'm appalled.


***Don't do me any favors with your self-righteous bloated ego. There comes a time with any threads here, that their shelf life dies a natural death. By looking at the number of views, and the number of responses--I would say the thread did nicely...thank you very much. For you to suggest that you're saving this thread from the basement by allowing it to continue with further good debate is amusing. There hasn't been any good debate here, Capt. Reread the responses to find where anyone had proved that a segregated community creates or breeds racism. You're not going to find one, el Captitante. Case closed, the segregation team won. We remain happy and non-racist. The reason people stopped responding here is because they were all satisfied in bowing out graciously in defeat.



No ptsdkid in DP = reasonable decorum. Hmmm...you said this. Are you saying that DP would be better of without you? Perhaps we should take a poll...:2razz:


***Not what I'm saying at all. If DP got rid of me, that would give the liberals here a false sense of security that their nonsensical, secular, anti-capitalistic, non traditional, unconstitutional, cut-and-run military policies would win the day by going unopposed. Straightening liberals out to walk the right and narrow is a dirty job, but someone's gotta do it, and I volunteer.



Have you forgotten the theme of this thread? I believe it's about segregation and racism, and how segregation prevents that...in your opinion. Now try to follow, kid. You have claimed to be one who supports segregation. You have stated how mulitculturalism hurts society. Hence in order to live a happy life, you chose to live the life of a segregationalist, avoiding multiculturalists. These are your claims. My question is pertinent to this: why, as a segregationalist, would you participate in a community filled with multiculturalists, people who can harm your way of life? Isn't this contrary to the segregationalist belief system? And if so, wouldn't you do better in a segregated community?


***Evidently you don't like listening to my many repeated answers to this very question. I'm going to defer my answer this time in order to maintain my emotional stability, and to hope beyond hope that you abide by DP rules to stop engaging in redundancy. If using redundancy isn't an infraction of a DP rule...it should be! Btw, doesn't the DP moderation team here have periodic assessment reviews of each of their members, and of the rules of engagement?




And yet, no one is listening. We live a healthy and happy lifestyle without any of your tenets, tenets that are incompatible with that lifestyle for most. You've failed, kid. And yet, this seems to surprise you.

***Do you speak for everyone of your multiculturalist cohorts (who are living in a racist society) when you say 'WE' live a healthy and happy lifestyle? And yes, anyone willing to succumb to living with daily racial tension does surprise me.



Now here is the irrelevance and non-congruence of your position: you assume that these things you say to be accurate and facts. And yet, as has been proven countless times, by many, many, many, you are unable to substantiate these personal opinions of yours. In fact, last summer you were given 24 hours to come up with substantiation for just one of your positions. I judged that contest. Remember, kid? You were unable to do that. It was then that the beginning of your complete failure began.


***Just what is it that I haven't been able to substantiate? Other than having you live with me as a roommate, I doubt that you'll ever see just how happy, content, and racially-tension free I really am.



But kid, the ease of your destruction in this thread alone has me concerned. Often this endeavor can be quite creative and entertaining. Yet, here, you slipped into posting quite obvious errors in facts. Your arguments were reduced to rubble even before I had the opportunity to destroy them. Most disheartening. Perhaps all this mixing with multiculturalists has been effecting you more then you believe.

***the only destruction I see with this thread, is the destructive lives of those that insist on living in a racist multicultural society.



I am aware of this completely...and this is my point. You are in this multiculturalist community, something non-analogous to the segregationalist belief system. This could compromise your standing in that community if this ever got out. You could get excommunicated, kid. It is confusing as to why one who abhors multiculturalists would choose to be in a community with them. It is inconsistent with your beliefs.


***You see Capitante, my mission is to get multiculturalists to change their wicked ways by assimilating into a comfortable American/segregationist lifestyle. My gate to happiness will be open for these people, but they need to do some soul searching first. They need to ask themselves, "Do I really want to continue life in a racist society, or do I have the will to change to the better?"



But no one here is complaining about being unhappy because of not being a segregationalist. If this is the basis of your argument, it folds completely at its foundation. And remember, without a foundation, the entire building folds. I'm sure you get the analogy.


***No, I do not get the analogy. Would you be more receptive to my ideals if I were to change my drug infested doggie avatar--to the smiling face of my catnip induced Cheshire cat?



Kid, I think it's time for you to do some personal self-evaluation. Opening up one's mind can create knowledge expansion. I would be happy to guide you in this, as it is obvious that your beliefs and actions are at war with themselves. Being at war with oneself can be quite distressing, but I'm certain I can point you in the right direction in order correct this problem. No need to thank me now. Your continued growth is thanks enough.

***Thank you for the advice and possible further guidance counseling to this stressful exposure of a political forum. One does have to assess his mental health before giving in to the vagaries of political parley. You've given me an idea el Capitante. Would you give me reassurance that a new post wouldn't get banned or moved, if I were to title it something like..."Does debating politics affect your mental health?"... and if so, what does your treatment plan look like?

I'm no longer the 'KID'...I'm the 'MAN'!

 

[CaptainCourtesy]

Reducing my arguments to little more then a group of withering, broken leaves, dancing aimlessly along a dusty, lonely road in some nondescript town? I've noticed that much of your discourse here relies upon fiction writings of say a Walt Witman, a Robert Frost, or perhaps from a John Greenleaf Whittier. The very concept of liberal powwow has always had that Orwellian touch with just enough seasoned flavor of a maddened Noam Chompski to make it the slightest bit interesting. Once again, thanks for beautifully representing your side of the ledger.

I liked the Orwellian reference, but Whitman or Frost? I was thinking more along the lines of Stienbeck or Hemmingway. The Nobel committee is considering my brief interlude as we speak. I'll be sure to keep you posted.

For someone choosing not to get involved--you sure did manage to hurt the multicultural cause by giving those who choose to live in a racist society (the multiculturalists), the option to stay silent with their racially incongruent living choice. Furthermore, you've given others the perfect escape hatch in that they won't feel as pressured from me to show or to give examples of racism in a segregated community. For as you and I know, it would be quite a stretch to show or to prove racial tension on an Indian reservation, in an Amish neighborhood, in Watts, in Harlem, in my gated community, or on my cousin's extremly segregated island. Funny that we never got you to comment on these very important factors, which I might add--go directly to the heart of the original question of "Will Segregation Prevent Racism". Oh, that's right too--you're overly stated position here is to try in vain to demolish my arguments. Well Capt, you could start by demolishing the very points made in this very paragraph....that is if your anomalous sleep schedule allows you that pleasure.

But you see, kid, everyone else left because they were done with you. Duke and Hatuey already disposed of your position very neatly. As far as each of your examples of of segregated societies, debunking their 'lack of racism' is easy. Segregated societies can create xenophobia. You can certainly find those in Harlem or Watts who are racist towards those that don't live in their communities...and those who don't live there are often racist towards these people. As for the Amish, please read up on claiping. If this is unsatisfying to you, I will attempt to elaborate when my 'anomalous sleep schedule' allows me more time.

Don't do me any favors with your self-righteous bloated ego.

Remember, there is a difference between confidence and conceit. The former is mine.

There comes a time with any threads here, that their shelf life dies a natural death.

I agree.

By looking at the number of views, and the number of responses--I would say the thread did nicely...thank you very much.

This is true, but...

For you to suggest that you're saving this thread from the basement by allowing it to continue with further good debate is amusing. There hasn't been any good debate here, Capt. Reread the responses to find where anyone had proved that a segregated community creates or breeds racism. You're not going to find one, el Captitante. Case closed, the segregation team won. We remain happy and non-racist. The reason people stopped responding here is because they were all satisfied in bowing out graciously in defeat.

See, this is where your argument loses integrity and you give the impression that you are reading another thread. Let us recap. The kid makes a typical OP without substantiation. When confronted on this. He gives a few examples. These examples are debunked, effectively ending the debate to the kid's defeat, but...the thread is resurrected when I question the integrity of the kid's segregationalist attitude with his participation in a multiculturalist forum. This brings on more discussion, including a Kelzie-Gunny interlude. This is where we are today. You see kid, I have given you the opportunity to further explain yourself and your views and to clear up some inconsitencies. I believe that others have vacated the thread because they were satisfied with their victorious outcome, whereas I prefer to continue to assist in the search for the deeper meanings of your stance and inconsistencies. Perhaps a useless endeavor, but I still have hope.

Not what I'm saying at all.

That's good to hear...I, for one, would miss you.

If DP got rid of me, that would give the liberals here a false sense of security that their nonsensical, secular, anti-capitalistic, non traditional, unconstitutional, cut-and-run military policies would win the day by going unopposed. Straightening liberals out to walk the right and narrow is a dirty job, but someone's gotta do it, and I volunteer.

My view is slightly different. If DP got rid of you it would be allowing a segregationalist to leave without fully experiencing the beauty, intelligence, mind-expansion, serenity, and brotherhood of the multiculturalist lifestyle. I would find it sad to see someone not experience this at least once.

Evidently you don't like listening to my many repeated answers to this very question. I'm going to defer my answer this time in order to maintain my emotional stability, and to hope beyond hope that you abide by DP rules to stop engaging in redundancy. If using redundancy isn't an infraction of a DP rule...it should be! Btw, doesn't the DP moderation team here have periodic assessment reviews of each of their members, and of the rules of engagement?

Well, I certainly wouldn't want to create any issues with your emotional stability. No, there is no rule about redundancy. However, as I have told you, I am extraordinarily stubborn. I will continue to ask a question until I get an answer. Since I haven't, I will ask again...why, as a segregationalist, would you participate in a community filled with multiculturalists, people who can harm your way of life? Isn't this contrary to the segregationalist belief system? And if so, wouldn't you do better in a segregated community? You have not answered this. I am curious as to how the concept of segregationalism and multiculturalism can exist simultaneously.

Do you speak for everyone of your multiculturalist cohorts (who are living in a racist society) when you say 'WE' live a healthy and happy lifestyle? And yes, anyone willing to succumb to living with daily racial tension does surprise me.

I have yet to see a multiculturalist in this forum complaining about this issue. And since I don't live with daily racial tension, I do not understand your surprise.

Just what is it that I haven't been able to substantiate? Other than having you live with me as a roommate, I doubt that you'll ever see just how happy, content, and racially-tension free I really am.

This I believe. It wasn't the point of my comment, though. Look back at this thread and observe how your unsubstantiated arguments were debunked. Heck, even the substantiated ones were debunked. That was the point of my statement. I am, however, glad that you are happy in your lifestyle.

No, I do not get the analogy.

An argument cannot stand without substantiation...a building cannot stand without a foundation.

Would you be more receptive to my ideals if I were to change my drug infested doggie avatar--to the smiling face of my catnip induced Cheshire cat?

At the very least I'd be interested in seeing what it would look like.

Thank you for the advice and possible further guidance counseling to this stressful exposure of a political forum. One does have to assess his mental health before giving in to the vagaries of political parley.

I'm glad you think so. A little self-evaluation never hurt anyone.

You've given me an idea el Capitante. Would you give me reassurance that a new post wouldn't get banned or moved, if I were to title it something like..."Does debating politics affect your mental health?"... and if so, what does your treatment plan look like?

Remember, kid. If you start the thread, you need to add your own treatment plan first, to get the debate going.

I'm no longer the 'KID'...I'm the 'MAN'!

Shall I try to change your username to ptsdman? :mrgreen:

 

[ptsdkid]

I liked the Orwellian reference, but Whitman or Frost? I was thinking more along the lines of Stienbeck or Hemmingway. The Nobel committee is considering my brief interlude as we speak. I'll be sure to keep you posted.


***Very noble of you.


But you see, kid, everyone else left because they were done with you. Duke and Hatuey already disposed of your position very neatly. As far as each of your examples of of segregated societies, debunking their 'lack of racism' is easy. Segregated societies can create xenophobia. You can certainly find those in Harlem or Watts who are racist towards those that don't live in their communities...and those who don't live there are often racist towards these people. As for the Amish, please read up on claiping. If this is unsatisfying to you, I will attempt to elaborate when my 'anomalous sleep schedule' allows me more time.

***Segregated socities 'CAN' create xenophobia? The key word here is 'CAN', where you weren't as clear as you could have been. This is where my teaching ability comes to the fore. Capt, for further reference in debating, and in representing your argument, try rephrasing that sentence to say....Segregated socities 'will' or 'have' created xenophobia. See Capt, without using the proper wording--your case falls flat. Your use of the word 'CAN' in this context tells me that rather than answering the questions I posed, you decided to use a hypothetical instead. Segregationists...1, Multiculturalists...0.




Remember, there is a difference between confidence and conceit. The former is mine.

***Thanks for the chuckle.



I agree.

***Good, I'm starting to believe that you're not as negative as I once thought.


See, this is where your argument loses integrity and you give the impression that you are reading another thread. Let us recap. The kid makes a typical OP without substantiation. When confronted on this. He gives a few examples. These examples are debunked, effectively ending the debate to the kid's defeat, but...the thread is resurrected when I question the integrity of the kid's segregationalist attitude with his participation in a multiculturalist forum. This brings on more discussion, including a Kelzie-Gunny interlude. This is where we are today. You see kid, I have given you the opportunity to further explain yourself and your views and to clear up some inconsitencies. I believe that others have vacated the thread because they were satisfied with their victorious outcome, whereas I prefer to continue to assist in the search for the deeper meanings of your stance and inconsistencies. Perhaps a useless endeavor, but I still have hope.


***That paragraph was perhpas the best example of double talk I've seen at DP. No one has debunked my argument here. Again, I'll need for you or others to show me where or how there is racial tension in those segregated communities I had mentioned.



That's good to hear...I, for one, would miss you.

***Yeah, I'm kinda getting a hard on for you too.



My view is slightly different. If DP got rid of you it would be allowing a segregationalist to leave without fully experiencing the beauty, intelligence, mind-expansion, serenity, and brotherhood of the multiculturalist lifestyle. I would find it sad to see someone not experience this at least once.

***Oh but I have experienced the multiculturalist lifestyle. I witnessed first hand the ugliness, the dumbing down of students in government schooling, the narrow-mindedness of liberally taught universities, urban decadence, and the palpable racism of mixing many cultures together. None of which is present in a segregated community.


I will continue to ask a question until I get an answer. Since I haven't, I will ask again...why, as a segregationalist, would you participate in a community filled with multiculturalists, people who can harm your way of life?


***This is where I fear your laziness comes into play. Could be your sleep schedule needs refining. I'm not totally blaming you for being lazy, for I'm lazy as well. Lazy enough to paraphrase my answer to your question by taking snippets from my last posting. I believe I told you (2 or 3) times now, that my mission here is to help change the views of the multiculturalists to where they start thinking and acting like pro Americans by coming over to the segregated conservative side of the ledger. If you were to peruse my profile--you might get to see a similar stated mission to get liberals to become conservatives.


I have yet to see a multiculturalist in this forum complaining about this issue. And since I don't live with daily racial tension, I do not understand your surprise.

***You have yet to see a multiculturalist complain about racism? This goes beyond being stubborn--this is ridiculous. A segregationist doesn't complain about racism because he doesn't allow himself to be a part of or exposed to multiculturalists. So that leaves the mixing of the cultures to complain, litigate and fight one another over the color of their skins. Where do you suppose this racial tension origninates from? It isn't coming from segregated neighborhoods.



This I believe. It wasn't the point of my comment, though. Look back at this thread and observe how your unsubstantiated arguments were debunked. Heck, even the substantiated ones were debunked. That was the point of my statement. I am, however, glad that you are happy in your lifestyle.

***I looked back, you're going to have to show me where any of my arguments have been debunked. The proof is in mamma's Indian pudding.



An argument cannot stand without substantiation...a building cannot stand without a foundation.

***Where did you pick that one from....George Orwell?



At the very least I'd be interested in seeing what it would look like.

***Think I'll keep you waiting.




I'm glad you think so. A little self-evaluation never hurt anyone.

***You're right, but the trick to success is to start the process NOW!



Remember, kid. If you start the thread, you need to add your own treatment plan first, to get the debate going.

***I have been sharing my treatment plan here with every posting.



Shall I try to change your username to ptsdman? :mrgreen:

***I would prefer if you will...to change it to Generalconservative

 

[CaptainCourtesy]

Very noble of you.

I think you meant very Nobel of me. For that slip you won't be mentioned in my acceptance speech.

Segregated socities 'CAN' create xenophobia? The key word here is 'CAN', where you weren't as clear as you could have been. This is where my teaching ability comes to the fore. Capt, for further reference in debating, and in representing your argument, try rephrasing that sentence to say....Segregated socities 'will' or 'have' created xenophobia. See Capt, without using the proper wording--your case falls flat. Your use of the word 'CAN' in this context tells me that rather than answering the questions I posed, you decided to use a hypothetical instead. Segregationists...1, Multiculturalists...0.

Nice try, kid, but no cigar. You took the statement out of context in order to focus on one word, to, rather fruitlessly, attempt to cause a crack in my argument. If you notice both the sentence before and the sentence after, I give examples of racism in segregated societies and denote how Duke and Hatuey combined to show your explanation of Japan to be incorrect. Thusly, the correct grammatical meaning is 'See...segregation CAN cause xenophobia'. My verbal 'crack sealer' has now been put in place closing the small leak caused by grammatical misinterpretation. I do appreciate you pointing this out.

Thanks for the chuckle.

You're welcome. You have given me many, also.

Good, I'm starting to believe that you're not as negative as I once thought.

You should know by now, kid...my positivity shines like a beacon leading lost ships through the fog towards a friendly port. Allow my light to guide you towards that happiness. Just practicing for the Nobel committee 2008.

That paragraph was perhpas the best example of double talk I've seen at DP. No one has debunked my argument here. Again, I'll need for you or others to show me where or how there is racial tension in those segregated communities I had mentioned.

Actually, it was the best example of a progressive and organized thread recap one could see at DP. And in order to see the debunking, I invite all to do but one thing: read the thread. Not only is it evident, but it has been recapped several times.

Yeah, I'm kinda getting a hard on for you too.

Let's stay on topic, kid. This is not the Sex and Sexuality Forum.

Oh but I have experienced the multiculturalist lifestyle. I witnessed first hand the ugliness, the dumbing down of students in government schooling, the narrow-mindedness of liberally taught universities, urban decadence, and the palpable racism of mixing many cultures together. None of which is present in a segregated community.

Ah, perception, kid. I have witnessed the beauty, diversity, the open-minded expansion of the mind, and melding of knowledge, and the toleration and working together of all peoples to create a sum greater then the total of the parts. Something one cannot find in a segregated, xenophobic, one-trick-pony of a society. Perhaps if you took of your segregationalist glasses, you would see things more clearly.

This is where I fear your laziness comes into play. Could be your sleep schedule needs refining. I'm not totally blaming you for being lazy, for I'm lazy as well. Lazy enough to paraphrase my answer to your question by taking snippets from my last posting. I believe I told you (2 or 3) times now, that my mission here is to help change the views of the multiculturalists to where they start thinking and acting like pro Americans by coming over to the segregated conservative side of the ledger. If you were to peruse my profile--you might get to see a similar stated mission to get liberals to become conservatives.

Yes, I see the laziness. You still address this in liberal-conservative remarks. You also continue to dodge the specific while staying focused on the general. The issue is how you can show your segregationalist beliefs are congruent with a multiculturalist forum, whereas remaining in a segregationalist community is what makes you happy. Is the pursuit of happiness a goal? Don't turn masochistic on us, kid.

I looked back, you're going to have to show me where any of my arguments have been debunked. The proof is in mamma's Indian pudding.

For your benefit, I will post links to the posts:
http://www.debatepolitics.com/506088-post70.html
http://www.debatepolitics.com/506415-post74.html
http://www.debatepolitics.com/506713-post79.html
http://www.debatepolitics.com/507041-post90.html
http://www.debatepolitics.com/507254-post92.html
http://www.debatepolitics.com/507869-post102.html
http://www.debatepolitics.com/507874-post105.html

That's a lot of debunking for just one thread. Once again I showed your complete failure at producing an argument that stands up to refutation.

Where did you pick that one from....George Orwell?

It's an original...I don't need to plagiarize.

Think I'll keep you waiting.

Patience is a virtue that is mine.

You're right, but the trick to success is to start the process NOW!

Please let me know how this goes for you.

I have been sharing my treatment plan here with every posting.

It must be in some foreign medical format that is unrecognizable to us Americans. Please clarify.

I would prefer if you will...to change it to Generalconservative

I'll see what I can do.

 

[ptsdkid]

I think you meant very Nobel of me. For that slip you won't be mentioned in my acceptance speech.


***No, I meant 'noble' as in notable or excellent.


Nice try, kid, but no cigar. You took the statement out of context in order to focus on one word, to, rather fruitlessly, attempt to cause a crack in my argument. If you notice both the sentence before and the sentence after, I give examples of racism in segregated societies and denote how Duke and Hatuey combined to show your explanation of Japan to be incorrect. Thusly, the correct grammatical meaning is 'See...segregation CAN cause xenophobia'. My verbal 'crack sealer' has now been put in place closing the small leak caused by grammatical misinterpretation. I do appreciate you pointing this out.


****That stubbornness you speak of gets rather grating as time moves on. Since when have you given examples of racism in segregated societies? It hasn't happened, and furthermore--Hautley and Duke haven't given an example either. Verbal rhetoric and generalizations are about all you guys can muster.



You should know by now, kid...my positivity shines like a beacon leading lost ships through the fog towards a friendly port. Allow my light to guide you towards that happiness. Just practicing for the Nobel committee 2008.


****I'll remember to call on you next time my commercial lobstermen buddies fight the dense fog when coming into Gloucester Harbor after the lone lighthouse sh!ts the bed.


Let's stay on topic, kid. This is not the Sex and Sexuality Forum.


***Since you, Hautley, and Duke have yet to give me examples of racism in a segregated community, the chances for a better debate might be better over on the sex and sexuality forum. Thanks for the heads-up.



Ah, perception, kid. I have witnessed the beauty, diversity, the open-minded expansion of the mind, and melding of knowledge, and the toleration and working together of all peoples to create a sum greater then the total of the parts. Something one cannot find in a segregated, xenophobic, one-trick-pony of a society. Perhaps if you took of your segregationalist glasses, you would see things more clearly.

***That one trick pony of a society you speak of is much easier to manage than that diverse dog and pony show that inundates the multicultural world. While you can only guess as to whether segregationists are racists or not, we segregationists know for a fact that all racists and racism occur within the enclaves of a diverse multicultural society. Try proving that wrong.



Yes, I see the laziness. You still address this in liberal-conservative remarks. You also continue to dodge the specific while staying focused on the general. The issue is how you can show your segregationalist beliefs are congruent with a multiculturalist forum, whereas remaining in a segregationalist community is what makes you happy. Is the pursuit of happiness a goal? Don't turn masochistic on us, kid.

***You're still trying my patience, Capt. You do know that to continue asking the same question that has been answered multiple times--that the chances of me having a mental relapse are great? I wouldn't want you to dodge my repeated answers by thinking that you got the best of a handicapped person. What would your moderator peers think of you if you told them you beat a handicapped debater? C-mon Capt, I want to see you admit that you've been bested here.



For your benefit, I will post links to the posts:
http://www.debatepolitics.com/506088-post70.html
http://www.debatepolitics.com/506415-post74.html
http://www.debatepolitics.com/506713-post79.html
http://www.debatepolitics.com/507041-post90.html
http://www.debatepolitics.com/507254-post92.html
http://www.debatepolitics.com/507869-post102.html
http://www.debatepolitics.com/507874-post105.html

That's a lot of debunking for just one thread. Once again I showed your complete failure at producing an argument that stands up to refutation.

***Excuse my laziness, but did you even bother to look at my side within those urls? They don't call me the debunking king for nothing. Take off those myopic eyeglasses to get a peek at the winner.



I'll see what I can do.

***All I ask is that you declare me the societal idol of the DP forum. The rest will all fall into place, I'm sure.

 

[CaptainCourtesy]

No, I meant 'noble' as in notable or excellent.

Why thank you. You're back in the acceptance speech.

That stubbornness you speak of gets rather grating as time moves on.

I know. One of the things that makes me so popular.

Since when have you given examples of racism in segregated societies? It hasn't happened, and furthermore--Hautley and Duke haven't given an example either. Verbal rhetoric and generalizations are about all you guys can muster.

Proven. Solidified. In stone. Though your rhetoric is somewhat well stated, it is, sadly, vacant of facts. Read my links.

I'll remember to call on you next time my commercial lobstermen buddies fight the dense fog when coming into Gloucester Harbor after the lone lighthouse sh!ts the bed.

Anything to help some hardworking fishermen. I am an avid fan of 'The Deadliest Catch'. Those guys work hard.

Since you, Hautley, and Duke have yet to give me examples of racism in a segregated community, the chances for a better debate might be better over on the sex and sexuality forum. Thanks for the heads-up.

Things move pretty fast over there, kid. I'm not sure if you could keep up.

hat one trick pony of a society you speak of is much easier to manage than that diverse dog and pony show that inundates the multicultural world. While you can only guess as to whether segregationists are racists or not, we segregationists know for a fact that all racists and racism occur within the enclaves of a diverse multicultural society. Try proving that wrong.

As an example of racism in a segregationist community, head on over to stormfront...oh, but you already knew that...:2razz:

You're still trying my patience, Capt. You do know that to continue asking the same question that has been answered multiple times--that the chances of me having a mental relapse are great? I wouldn't want you to dodge my repeated answers by thinking that you got the best of a handicapped person. What would your moderator peers think of you if you told them you beat a handicapped debater? C-mon Capt, I want to see you admit that you've been bested here.

I didn't know that not answering a question could cause a mental relapse. I think it would be quite a feather in my cap if I caused someone to become handicapped because of my debating ability. And since I haven't been bested, admitting so would be lying...something I find rather discourteous. BTW, if you don't want to answer, just say so, and we'll move on.

Excuse my laziness, but did you even bother to look at my side within those urls? They don't call me the debunking king for nothing. Take off those myopic eyeglasses to get a peek at the winner.

I certainly did look at your side, and other then a possibly drunken post, I saw nothing of consequence. Though discussing going out with your girlfriend was a nice, yet irrelevant interlude. And yes, kid, I have always referred to you as the debunkED king. And this thread allows you to keep that crown.

All I ask is that you declare me the societal idol of the DP forum. The rest will all fall into place, I'm sure.

OK, I declare you the societal IDLE of the DP Forum. :2razz:

 

[ptsdkid]

Why thank you. You're back in the acceptance speech.

***Is that your introductory speech that goes something like this....Hi, my name is Capt Courtsey, and I'm an alcoholic?



I know. One of the things that makes me so popular.

***You mean there is more than one?



Proven. Solidified. In stone. Though your rhetoric is somewhat well stated, it is, sadly, vacant of facts. Read my links.


***Thanks, but my anomolous sleep patterns don't allow me that pleasure.



Anything to help some hardworking fishermen. I am an avid fan of 'The Deadliest Catch'. Those guys work hard.


***Lobstering during the winter season isn't exactly my vision of a safe occupation, yet those guys are the salt of the land, nonetheless.



Things move pretty fast over there, kid. I'm not sure if you could keep up.


***Hey, I can rise to the occasion as well as the next guy. Its not always that hard, but I substitute lack of firmness with 'length' and 'duration'.



As an example of racism in a segregationist community, head on over to stormfront...oh, but you already knew that...:2razz:


***Its not racism at stormfront...its called WHITE PRIDE!



I didn't know that not answering a question could cause a mental relapse. I think it would be quite a feather in my cap if I caused someone to become handicapped because of my debating ability. And since I haven't been bested, admitting so would be lying...something I find rather discourteous. BTW, if you don't want to answer, just say so, and we'll move on.


***I didn't mind answering; just didn't want to play your redundancy game any longer.


I certainly did look at your side, and other then a possibly drunken post, I saw nothing of consequence. Though discussing going out with your girlfriend was a nice, yet irrelevant interlude. And yes, kid, I have always referred to you as the debunkED king. And this thread allows you to keep that crown.


***So long as you agree with me, things are kosher.


OK, I declare you the societal IDLE of the DP Forum. :2razz:

***Try using spellcheck next time. The word is IDOL!

 

[CaptainCourtesy]

Is that your introductory speech that goes something like this....Hi, my name is Capt Courtsey, and I'm an alcoholic?

No, it will be something like, 'Hi my name is CaptainCourtesy and you're not...sucks for you.' That should get those stuffy Nobel people going. I was thinking of going with, 'Hi, my name is CaptainCourtesy and I debunk ptsdkid at every turn', but since your not famous like me, they probably wouldn't get it.

You mean there is more than one?

More than your mind could possibly comprehend. Haven't you been paying attention?

Thanks, but my anomolous sleep patterns don't allow me that pleasure.

And what pleasures do your anomolous sleep patterns allow you...wait...strike that...I'd rather not know.

Lobstering during the winter season isn't exactly my vision of a safe occupation, yet those guys are the salt of the land, nonetheless.

Fishing...salt of the land...good one. The guys that do that are about the toughest there are.

Hey, I can rise to the occasion as well as the next guy. Its not always that hard, but I substitute lack of firmness with 'length' and 'duration'.

Just remember the old adage, kid: Overrated...length, underrated...width. Also, it is not the size of the missile that counts, but the accuracy of it's guidance system.

Its not racism at stormfront...its called WHITE PRIDE!

Really? I thought stormfront was a place where all the 'special' people hung out.

I didn't mind answering; just didn't want to play your redundancy game any longer.

Hey, remember, you can't win if you don't play...guess that means I win.

So long as you agree with me, things are kosher.

Well, I guess we won't be dining at the local Jewish deli, then.

Try using spellcheck next time. The word is IDOL!

I like how it came out my way, better.

 

[Duke]

Hey Kid, can you give me an example of when, due to segregation, different races or creeds or peoples lost all of their hate for each other?


Duke

 

[ptsdkid]

Hey Kid, can you give me an example of when, due to segregation, different races or creeds or peoples lost all of their hate for each other?
Duke

***I know that this will be hard for you to grasp, but I can't see where segregated peoples' had ever hated other different races or creeds. Again, the personal choice to segregate mostly comes from not wanting to live with multiculturalists and racists alike. In this case I'm pro choice; I choose not to be a racist, and not to live among racial tensions. I might add, my personal choice to eliminate racism from my personal life is doing wonders for my stress-free PTSD treatment plan.

 

[Duke]

Originally Posted by Duke
Hey Kid, can you give me an example of when, due to segregation, different races or creeds or peoples lost all of their hate for each other?
Duke

***I know that this will be hard for you to grasp, but I can't see where segregated peoples' had ever hated other different races or creeds.

So the answer is no. Then why are you still arguing? The rest of us have proved plenty of times that segregated people, when coming into contact with each other later, are ridiculously intolerant. You don't have a point, you don't have an argument, and most importantly, you don't have a clue.


Duke

 

[ptsdkid]

So the answer is no.

***Answer is no to what question?


Then why are you still arguing?


***Who's arguing?


The rest of us have proved plenty of times that segregated people, when coming into contact with each other later, are ridiculously intolerant.


***Be precise by showing me one time how segregated people are intolerant with each other. By intolerant, do you mean when I get upset with my neighbor for drooling when he talks? That does bug me a bit, but I wouldn't consider it racism.



You don't have a point, you don't have an argument, and most importantly, you don't have a clue.


***My point has been that segregation prevents racism, and I didn't get to see a debatable argument against that fact--the clue being that I as a segregationist am one happy and contented American.

 

[Duke]

***Answer is no to what question?

\

Could your memory actually be that bad? Or do you just have so little hindsight that you won't go through the effort of looking one post in the past?

http://www.debatepolitics.com/513887-post161.html

***Who's arguing?

***Be precise by showing me one time how segregated people are intolerant with each other. By intolerant, do you mean when I get upset with my neighbor for drooling when he talks? That does bug me a bit, but I wouldn't consider it racism.

Fine. Drop intolerant. Racist. Let me rephrase that for you:

The rest of us have proved plenty of times that segregated people, when coming into contact with each other later, are ridiculously racist.

Now, are you going to face it, or just bluster on unintelligibly?


You don't have a point, you don't have an argument, and most importantly, you don't have a clue.

***My point has been that segregation prevents racism, and I didn't get to see a debatable argument against that fact--the clue being that I as a segregationist am one happy and contented American.

Your point is that segregation prevents racism, but you have no facts whatsoever supporting that point, so it's not really a point at all, is it? In fact, it is so not a point, that there are mountains of facts that contradict it. Too bad.


Duke

 

[Pull My Finger]

The 'no' reply is unfair.

Segregation condones racism.

Peace

 

[CaptainCourtesy]

Is this thread still going on?

 

[Duke]

Is this thread still going on?

Not since the Kid jumped ship, no. Okay everyone, enough is enough, the exit's that way. :2razz:

It's been fun.


Duke

 

[ptsdkid]

Not since the Kid jumped ship, no. Okay everyone, enough is enough, the exit's that way. :2razz:

It's been fun.

Duke

****I never jump ship. I'm the Captain at the helm, but I refuse join the swabbies in bailing out the water once she starts to sink.

 

[Duke]

****I never jump ship. I'm the Captain at the helm, but I refuse join the swabbies in bailing out the water once she starts to sink.

More like the whipping boy.:roll:


Duke