- Joined
- Sep 25, 2005
- Messages
- 15,675
- Reaction score
- 2,979
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
easyt65 said:You try your best to dismiss my entire post as Republican talkig oints, focussing on the wire taps and Plame while wisely dodging all the other well-documented points.
Well, lets address the 2 you hit upon:
1. Plame. Youdo not deny that the investigation into Plame ruled she was never a 'Covert' operative by definition, so there was never any law broken. the whole 'scandal' was poltical BS. You may call the fact that she posed for magazines and gave interviews in which she talked about working for the CIA, but you don't deny it - and just because you call them talking points doesn't mean it isn't true, which you do not try to say, either. as far as Joe Wilson's books and your demand that I do your homework for you - why is it that every Dem demands that I spoonfeed them in a debate. Do your own research - it can't be that hard because Jow Wilson has onlyput out somethig like 2 books, the books I am referring to. Do your own research! As far as other proof, if you kept up with the investigation and reporting while they were on-going, you would have heard numerous reporters sayin interviews how they all knew Wilson's wife was known among Washington circles to work for the CIA! Several Seanators, including Lieberman, said that he and many congressmen knew as they had been introduced to Plame by Wilson at functions, at which time Wilson introduced Plame as his 'CIA wife'!
After years of investigations and millions of taz payer dollars to determine plame was never covert thus no crime was ever committed, the only result has been to indict libby for not remembering the exact details of his actions and whereabouts on 1 day inquestion several years ago! i guess he should have used the ol' "It depends on what the definition of 'IS' is" defense that got Clinton off (so to speak :rofl )!
You can claim 'talking points', but they are also FACTS!
I agree with you that it does not appear that Plame was covert. What does that have to do with the questions I asked you? I am asking you to provide evidence to substantiate your "talking points" because I would be utterly shocked if you could provide me such information. Putting the burden on me to prove your assertions is a desperate attempt to avoid admitting that you don't have any evidence. LOL
Inregards to Bush's wire taps:
1) Do you have anyidea what the role/job of the Attorney general, who has stated that he has already investigated and found the Dem's claim of illegality to be bogus, is? Do you have any idea what the NSA's agency that has been reviewing this is? You mention checks and balances - yes, and they are being done! The U.S. justice Department, whose job it is to determine this, has decided there is nothing to the Dem's claims.
Well considering that my husband works for the Dept. of Justice, I have a pretty good idea of the role/job of the AG. Thanks for checking with me. To continue to assert that since the AG found no wrongdoing means that you don't know what you're talking about when it comes to the Constitution and the balance of powers. Why do you think that Congress has to hold hearings on this issue? Just because they want to? NOPE. That's what the Constitution tells them to.
While you try to lecture me on checks and balances and say just because I, the NSA, the AG, and the Justice Department say there is nothing illegal about the wire taps, the truth is that they ARE illegal becaue YOU, Kerry, and Dean say so! (Nice dodge, BTW, not mentioning Clinton's FBI Files, wiretaps, AND illegal search and seisures without warrants!) Your only defense of that entire post outlining the illegal, immoral, hypocritical, and unethical behavior (FACTS) of the Democrats is to label the facts as 'GOP Talking points! :spin: :rofl
Hmmm, you may not be mature enough for me to be having any sort of meaningful discussion with you about this. Buh bye. :2wave: