I don’t think trumps crimes should be ignored.If you think Trump's crimes are being ignored.....lol.....what can be said?......LMAO. Guess Biden is being aggressively prosecuted for his crimes........
Not that it matters in this instance, but the House Speaker has no constitutional authority to “direct” any standing Congressional committee to investigate anything/anyone.
Paul Manafort did sell campaign information to Russia. He went to jail for lying about it. Trump did condition Congressionally-approved aid to Ukraine based on them digging up political dirt on Biden. It's in an audio recording. Trump did try to pressure Secretary Raffensberger into cheating 11,000 votes into existence. That's also in a publicly-available audio recording. And Trump did try to lie, cheat, defraud, and then violence his way back into illegitimate power. That's according to eyewitness testimony under oath and video evidence. The fact that the two-tiered justice system, and partisan Congressional Republicans, have not yet, or have in the past chosen not to, hold him accountable doesn't mean he didn't actually do it.
You seem to want them to be ignored. Why is that?
Sure. And if they find him guilty then lock his creepy ass up. What's so hard about that? But here we're talking about holding Trump accountable. Biden is in another thread somewhere. If Trump is indicted, will you actually look into the charges and decide for yourself whether they have any merit, or will you dismiss it out of hand as just another partisan hoax meant to change the votes of those who somehow are still on the fence about voting for a lying traitor?
The left isn’t going to indict anyone, that’s not possible given our legal structure.
But he shouldn't let them go ahead and do their stupid little song and dance and eventually get embarrassed by it I mean I've been doing it for 6 years and they've been failing over and over and over at it.
You have it twisted. “The left” won’t be indicting Traitor Trump. The people of New York County’s DA’s office will be indicting “individual 1”.
Oh but Merrick Garland was appointed by Biden so it must mean the Dems are attacking poor innocent conservatives who never do anything wrong just because they're afraid of Trump winning again and really draining the swamp this time.
www.politico.com
We're always near an election.Let's indict Trump on all his jaywalking high crimes and the fines he paid, but we have to do it near an election to influence voters minds......yeah that's the ticket......then we'll get our FBI and DOJ to not indict Hunter, and get 50 of our butt buddies to cover for us.....yeah that's the ticket.....then we'll collude with Russia to get a dossier on Trump to blame him on collusion.....yeah that's the ticket.......
You were mistaken when you said it's been "one insane false narrative after another". I showed you why but you seem to have missed the point. I'm heading off, have a great evening!
That will be explored in court.Clinton settles sexual harassment suit, Nov. 14, 1998
The settlement with Paula Jones, reached without the suit going to trial, heaped fuel on Clinton’s impeachment proceedings by the Republican-controlled House.
What was the issue again? Trump paying off Daniels with 'hush money'?
Because Kenneth Star declined to take that step.
It’s an example of two different cases with two different outcomes. If you were truly interested in that question, you would have to show that the cases were exactly alike in every major detail.
he still isn’t the left but someone charged with enforcement of the law.
You think any Republican unwilling to join Traitor Trump in his illegal/unconstitutional attempted coup were in the wrong.
Unedited recordings and transcripts cannot be opinionated. A nonsensical assertion.
Didn't he campaign on that particular issue? Trump and Daniels?
So ignore Clinton's crimes then?
In the case of Democrats it's better to ignore their crimes, but a non-Democrat, the NY AG faking up a misdemeanor to a felony for political purposes is perfect accetpable.
Perhaps.
That’s between you and Star. If you disagree then send him a strongly worded letter or something.
Or you could try not being a liar. The simple fact is that the Clinton thing has been done for over two decades.
I'm not.
Where have stated anything different?