but dear our subject is capitalism. You had en masse enslavement all over the world 100,000 years before capitalism was invented and under all forms of govt. Certainly, even as a liberal, you have the ability to understand that???
dear, I didn't say capitalism was people going shopping. I said "capitalism is free people freely shopping with their own money and free businesses competing for customers and employees on basis of price and quality. Its hard to imagine how that killed even one person. Care to rethink???"
Notice the way you lied to yourself and believed it. We this creating a strawman. Do you understand?
if simplistic why is the liberal so afraid to say why?I parodied the simplistic nature of your analysis
The slave trade saw the industrial scale enslavement of people
all pervasive capitalism we see all around the globe today is the culmination of a system of profiteering that goes way back.
Reading the posts here from Conservatives concerning history and Hitler is a very sad indictment of the American Educational System.
My God!!
But neither[ Hitler or Stalin] practiced socialism of the form it takes today - they had far more emphasis on authority, and less on the social aspect. At least as I understand history.
One of these days read a good book, Jimmy.
Bull****.wrong I'm afraid. Today's socialism is identical except its held back by the huge success of Republican Capitalism. Govt is huge and Sanders, Obama, Clinton only want to make it far far more huge. Without Republicans a sensitivity and caring arms race would soon develop and Hitler Stalin Mao would soon be back in style to instantly solve all problems with huge magical govt. Liberal power corrupts; absolute liberal power corrupts absolutely.
Hitler's Nazi party and Stalin's communism were authoritarian in the extreme,d.
Authoritarian policies are held back in the USA by the constitution and the rule of law.
The Constitution has been a barrier to Republican ideas just as much as Democrat ones.you mean by Republicans who agree with the Constitution and not by liberals who want a non Constitutional or non originalist reading of it. Do you understand?
The republicans have long had a large faction which wants to ban abortions entirely, which is an authoritarian policy.
What policy or policies that Sanders suggested is, was, or would be authoritarian in nature?actually liberals like Sanders want always bigger and bigger more authoritarian govt. Our Founders were exact opposite
wanting to keep govt very very tiny with only a few enumerated powers. Now you've got it??
What policy or policies that Sanders suggested is, was, or would be authoritarian in nature?
Another thing that is subject to debate is the how precisely the "Founders" thought things should work.
And any interpretation of the same has to be viewed in the context of today's issues - many of which they had not even an inkling of. Interpretations are almost always fraught with disagreement.
Being opposed to murder is hardly authoritarian. It would be like saying parents are very authoritarian for making their kids brush their teeth. Civilization must have some basic rules to be a civilized. The Constitution promotes these few good rules. Make sense now?
Yes they were. I just listed the principles that unite them
I worded the post perfectly. Communism and fascism are both collectivist dictatorships. They are two sides of the same coin. Hitler and Stalin had the same goals and used the same methods. A person who believed in individual rights and human liberty would meet the same fate at the same rate of speed under either man. Hitler repsresnted the collectivist right and Stalin the collectivist left. The basic ideology of both men was collectivism.
The Constitution has been a barrier to Republican ideas just as much as Democrat ones.
.
I certainly don't think either party is infallible or even CLOSE to always right.
.
The healthcare industry shouldn't BE in control. We're the customers, WE should be in control. Otherwise where is the competition and free market forces?his very nature is violent authoritarian. For example, he wants to put a gun to the heads of everyone in the healthcare industry to force them to relinquish control and let his huge liberal govt control all of it. Got it now???
Being opposed to murder is hardly authoritarian. It would be like saying parents are very authoritarian for making their kids brush their teeth. Civilization must have some basic rules to be a civilized. The Constitution promotes these few good rules. Make sense now?
Fascism is definitely Alt- right ideology.