- Joined
- May 6, 2016
- Messages
- 1,908
- Reaction score
- 489
- Location
- Colorado
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
This sounds like a very ultra conservative thing to say but the government needs to be stricter on divorces. The reason for this is because it is a huge contributor to poverty and juvenile (and later adult) crimes. Divorce contributes to poverty and juvenile delinquency because it is often up to single mothers to work and parent their kid(s). It's often difficult for parents to do their job as parents if they're too busy fighting. As noted by the below statistics, black couples have the highest rate on divorces; this is part of the reason why blacks on average are poorer than whites and even most minorities. This is also why asian kids tend to be smarter than other races (they're the lowest). Most abduction perpetrators are parents who lose custody.
Divorce statistics here: https://divorcescience.org/2012/06/29/351/
A good solution is to create a longer process for couples with kids under 18 to go through wanting to get a divorce and make it stricter. A good reason will be needed for a divorce (such as abusiveness on one part of the parent and/or contributing to the deliquncy of the child); financial reasons will be denied. If a childless couple wants a divorce then it should be as quick and simple as nevada's. Adoption centers should make the process more simple for law abiding couples with children and more strict for single wannabe parents.
P.S. I wasn't sure where to put this thread so I just put it here
It's often difficult for parents to do their job as parents if they're too busy fighting.
So the poor are forced to stay with someone they hate?This sounds like a very ultra conservative thing to say but the government needs to be stricter on divorces. The reason for this is because it is a huge contributor to poverty and juvenile (and later adult) crimes. Divorce contributes to poverty and juvenile delinquency because it is often up to single mothers to work and parent their kid(s). It's often difficult for parents to do their job as parents if they're too busy fighting. As noted by the below statistics, black couples have the highest rate on divorces; this is part of the reason why blacks on average are poorer than whites and even most minorities. This is also why asian kids tend to be smarter than other races (they're the lowest). Most abduction perpetrators are parents who lose custody.
Divorce statistics here: https://divorcescience.org/2012/06/29/351/
A good solution is to create a longer process for couples with kids under 18 to go through wanting to get a divorce and make it stricter. A good reason will be needed for a divorce (such as abusiveness on one part of the parent and/or contributing to the deliquncy of the child); financial reasons will be denied. If a childless couple wants a divorce then it should be as quick and simple as nevada's. Adoption centers should make the process more simple for law abiding couples with children and more strict for single wannabe parents.
P.S. I wasn't sure where to put this thread so I just put it here
This sounds like a very ultra conservative thing to say but the government needs to be stricter on divorces. The reason for this is because it is a huge contributor to poverty and juvenile (and later adult) crimes. Divorce contributes to poverty and juvenile delinquency because it is often up to single mothers to work and parent their kid(s). It's often difficult for parents to do their job as parents if they're too busy fighting. As noted by the below statistics, black couples have the highest rate on divorces; this is part of the reason why blacks on average are poorer than whites and even most minorities. This is also why asian kids tend to be smarter than other races (they're the lowest). Most abduction perpetrators are parents who lose custody.
Divorce statistics here: https://divorcescience.org/2012/06/29/351/
A good solution is to create a longer process for couples with kids under 18 to go through wanting to get a divorce and make it stricter. A good reason will be needed for a divorce (such as abusiveness on one part of the parent and/or contributing to the deliquncy of the child); financial reasons will be denied. If a childless couple wants a divorce then it should be as quick and simple as nevada's. Adoption centers should make the process more simple for law abiding couples with children and more strict for single wannabe parents.
P.S. I wasn't sure where to put this thread so I just put it here
If that's true, wouldn't it be better for the parents to get divorced rather than stay together and fight all the time?
Marriage councellors should do a better job of helping parenting couples get along
It should be harder to get married and easier to get divorced.
As was the norm in decades passed.So the poor are forced to stay with someone they hate?
Wouldn't those with the money and means just travel to somewhere where the divorce laws are more lax?
This sounds like a very ultra conservative thing to say but the government needs to be stricter on divorces. The reason for this is because it is a huge contributor to poverty and juvenile (and later adult) crimes. Divorce contributes to poverty and juvenile delinquency because it is often up to single mothers to work and parent their kid(s). It's often difficult for parents to do their job as parents if they're too busy fighting. As noted by the below statistics, black couples have the highest rate on divorces; this is part of the reason why blacks on average are poorer than whites and even most minorities. This is also why asian kids tend to be smarter than other races (they're the lowest). Most abduction perpetrators are parents who lose custody.
Divorce statistics here: https://divorcescience.org/2012/06/29/351/
A good solution is to create a longer process for couples with kids under 18 to go through wanting to get a divorce and make it stricter. A good reason will be needed for a divorce (such as abusiveness on one part of the parent and/or contributing to the deliquncy of the child); financial reasons will be denied. If a childless couple wants a divorce then it should be as quick and simple as nevada's. Adoption centers should make the process more simple for law abiding couples with children and more strict for single wannabe parents.
P.S. I wasn't sure where to put this thread so I just put it here
So the poor are forced to stay with someone they hate?
Wouldn't those with the money and means just travel to somewhere where the divorce laws are more lax?
But you see, the rich tend to be able to support their children much better than the poor can when a divorce is going on. Plus like I said, financial reasons are the most common reason for a divorce, at least in america.
How would that affect anything? Divorce, like marriage, is just paperwork. What matters is the relationship. Even if you make divorce impossible people will still breakup and live separately from each other and move on with their lives apart from one another.
How would that affect anything? Divorce, like marriage, is just paperwork. What matters is the relationship. Even if you make divorce impossible people will still breakup and live separately from each other and move on with their lives apart from one another.
putting tighter restrictions on divorce would heavily reduce crime, increase family income, and make teens less likely to turn to drugs and booze and then end up in a broken relationship themselves
So in other words,only the rich can get divorced according to your scenario.
That just doesn't seem fair.
This sounds like a very ultra conservative thing to say but the government needs to be stricter on divorces. The reason for this is because it is a huge contributor to poverty and juvenile (and later adult) crimes. Divorce contributes to poverty and juvenile delinquency because it is often up to single mothers to work and parent their kid(s). It's often difficult for parents to do their job as parents if they're too busy fighting. As noted by the below statistics, black couples have the highest rate on divorces; this is part of the reason why blacks on average are poorer than whites and even most minorities. This is also why asian kids tend to be smarter than other races (they're the lowest). Most abduction perpetrators are parents who lose custody.
Divorce statistics here: https://divorcescience.org/2012/06/29/351/
A good solution is to create a longer process for couples with kids under 18 to go through wanting to get a divorce and make it stricter. A good reason will be needed for a divorce (such as abusiveness on one part of the parent and/or contributing to the deliquncy of the child); financial reasons will be denied. If a childless couple wants a divorce then it should be as quick and simple as nevada's. Adoption centers should make the process more simple for law abiding couples with children and more strict for single wannabe parents.
P.S. I wasn't sure where to put this thread so I just put it here
putting tighter restrictions on divorce would heavily reduce crime, increase family income, and make teens less likely to turn to drugs and booze and then end up in a broken relationship themselves
Well, I wouldn't put it that way, I'm just saying that children are more likely to turn to crime when their parents divorce and they are poor than if they're rich
Well, I wouldn't put it that way, I'm just saying that children are more likely to turn to crime when their parents divorce and they are poor than if they're rich
putting tighter restrictions on divorce would heavily reduce crime, increase family income, and make teens less likely to turn to drugs and booze and then end up in a broken relationship themselves
All you're going to do is reduce marriage, period. You won't be able to stop people from breaking up if they want to break up. If you make divorce too difficult, people just won't get married in the first place.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?