We have proof of Trumps guilt which is why Mitch stated that he was guilty
No response from you on that
Why do you hate America so much?
Enough to convince McConnell and others that Trump was guilty. McConnell was just to much of a political coward to vote guilty unlike some of his Republican colleaguesMcConnell’s statement is not evidence, just his personal opinion.
What other “evidence” do you think your side offered for Trump’s guilt in the riot?
Support for a traitor to the USA demonstrates hatred of the USAWhen did a disdain for cheesy debate tactics become the same as hatred for America?
And when are Mad Libs going to work that one into their plan to “build back bloodier?”
I'm going to recap what happened just for you. Donald lost the 2020 election to Joe Biden. Donald, being an extremely arrogant, obstinate and egotistical man couldn't psychologically handle the loss. So Donald fell Into an abyss of denial and started fervently claiming that there was no way he could of lost and that he had actually won the election.... By a landslide. Now, Donald's moronic base felt the same way. They felt there was no way Donald could of possibly lost to Joe Biden and they decided to take action. So, they gathered at the Capital on Jan. 6th to "stop the steal". Ashli Babbitt went as well. She went inside the Capital with the rest of the mob. There was a set of double doors, the kind that had windows on them. The doors were baracaded shut and the windows were broken and an armed plainclothes cop had his service weapon trained on the broken window........ Ashli, for some unbeknownst reason, decided it would be prudent to climb through that window..... The officer guarding that door fired one shot and Ashli was killed. ... The real question here is, why did Ashli try to climb through that window? When an officer of the law has his weapon pointed at you and you do not follow their verbal commands chances are you're going to get shot. And that's what happened to Ashli.In Mad Lib dreams.
Months ago I remember some Libs here exulting that Trump was about to be tried and jailed for some economic offenses.
Nothing happened there either, and that’s because the Left’s desperation to find a smoking gun makes them disregard things like evidence. Whatever the sins of “stop the steal,” that farrago should be seen as a response to an unending stream of Democratic dirty tricks (of which Russiagate was the most egregious).
I still care less about whatever confused opinion you hold on the rioters than on the fact that you falsely tried to extend that opinion to me as part of a lame rhetorical strategy.
On a forum like this, there’s no such thing as protesting too much. That’s the whole attraction of the site: the sometimes dubious thrill of arguing with strangers on matters on which no one ever agrees (except the members of one’s own choir).
Enough to convince McConnell and others that Trump was guilty. McConnell was just to much of a political coward to vote guilty unlike some of his Republican colleagues
But you an look here:
The internet is full of evidence for Trump's second impeachment trial
Senators could consider Trump's actions from thousands of angles by looking at social media feeds from those present.www.cnet.com etc, etc...The most devastating piece of evidence at the Trump trial | CNN
Elie Honig writes House impeachment managers presented one devastating piece of evidence that decisively refutes Trump's attorneys' claim about their client's state of mind: Trump's tweet on January 6 shortly after the insurrection.www.cnn.com
I'm going to recap what happened just for you. Donald lost the 2020 election to Joe Biden. Donald, being an extremely arrogant, obstinate and egotistical man couldn't psychologically handle the loss. So Donald fell Into an abyss of denial and started fervently claiming that there was no way he could of lost and that he had actually won the election.... By a landslide. Now, Donald's moronic base felt the same way. They felt there was no way Donald could of possibly lost to Joe Biden and they decided to take action. So, they gathered at the Capital on Jan. 6th to "stop the steal". Ashli Babbitt went as well. She went inside the Capital with the rest of the mob. There was a set of double doors, the kind that had windows on them. The doors were baracaded shut and the windows were broken and an armed plainclothes cop had his service weapon trained on the broken window........ Ashli, for some unbeknownst reason, decided it would be prudent to climb through that window..... The officer guarding that door fired one shot and Ashli was killed. ... The real question here is, why did Ashli try to climb through that window? When an officer of the law has his weapon pointed at you and you do not follow their verbal commands chances are you're going to get shot. And that's what happened to Ashli.
What case? You made a comment and it's clear you let the right-wing media lead you around by the nose. You completely failed on the discussion at hand...the danger of the mob. And all this about the media is just a diversion from you bobbing and weaving around that and falsely accusing me of saying 'every person in the mob was dangerous.'Look how much you just posted to defend yourself? LOL "Me thinketh thou does protest too much"
Except to continually highlight your fail.
When y'all have enough valid evidence to prove, in a court of law, that the election was fraudulent, then I will concede. Until then Donald's nothing but an arrogant, obstinate and egotistical reality show host who can't admit he lost.As forTrump’s actions, I’m not surprised you don’t want to talk about their being a reaction to Democratic dirty tricks.
Wow, you’re really in love with your misapplied Hamlet quotation, and with your skewed perception of Fox News, even though my original argument had nothing to do with anything Fox said.
See the text in orange? That text is so stupid and dishonest that that's the best reason not to answer the actual question you asked, which could have been legitimate. Until you added the stupid hyperbolic nonsense.Here’s a question from that argument that you have failed to answer: if the rioters had somehow come across Mike Pence, do you really think they would have killed him? And what are your reasons for that belief? Just because they said they would? If so, does that mean that everyone who ever makes such a statement is capable of murder?
Because their moral values are based on political advantage, not right and wrong.
.
You must be joking the first link is to the US senate website showing you didn't even pay attention to what I postedYou must be joking.
No one’s going to read a whole Wiki article to find whatever point you think has been made. If there’s a section that you think supports your argument, excerpt it.
The next citation talks about what evidence MIGHT be presented.
The last presents its “evidence” as something Trump did AFTER the outbreak of violence.
Do you even know what “evidence” means?
When y'all have enough valid evidence to prove, in a court of law, that the election was fraudulent, then I will concede. Until then Donald's nothing but an arrogant, obstinate and egotistical reality show host who can't admit he lost.
What case? You made a comment and it's clear you let the right-wing media lead you around by the nose. You completely failed on the discussion at hand...the danger of the mob. And all this about the media is just a diversion from you bobbing and weaving around that and falsely accusing me of saying 'every person in the mob was dangerous.'
Look how much you just posted to defend yourself? LOL "Me thinketh thou does protest too much"
Except to continually highlight your fail.
See the text in orange? That text is so stupid and dishonest that that's the best reason not to answer the actual question you asked, which could have been legitimate. Until you added the stupid hyperbolic nonsense.
You must be joking the first link is to the US senate website showing you didn't even pay attention to what I posted
Unlike you I understand what evidence is, as well as reality
I understand that you cant defend your God/Emperor
Oh? My mistake then....... What did you mean by " democrats dirty tricks"?I didn’t bring up the allegations regarding the election at all. Go back and read what I wrote.
Actually I did but you refuse to look at it because you dont want toBig deal; the first citation has no more applicability than the one from Wikipedia. So you still offered no evidence, just things you think bolster your position in vague ways.
Like I said I understand that you cant defend your God/EmperorI’ve already spoke of Trump’s possible “sins,” so I haven’t given him a pass. So your screed is meaningless. But the idea of a Mad Lib calling Trump a “traitor” after totally failing to cite evidence is hilarious beyond words. Just like trying to upgrade a riot into an insurrection.
No dodging from me; it’s you who claimed that the mob was uniformly dangerous
and then tried to backpedal by making a special definition of what a mob is or does.
It's not logical...it completely fails in scope and application. You reduced your question down to an overly-simplistic generalization as your 'conclusion.' It was a stupid and obvious attempt.You clearly don’t even know what “hyperbolic” means. I defined the logical failure that must arise from anyone who claims that word=deed, and your only honest responses would be to say that you don’t know whether or not the rioters would have killed Pence or anyone else.
Oh? My mistake then....... What did you mean by " democrats dirty tricks"?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?