- Joined
- Nov 24, 2018
- Messages
- 13,199
- Reaction score
- 2,896
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Slightly Conservative
The writer of The Art of the Deal, Tony Schwartz, portrays Trump as a very unloveable person. Someone no one should ever trust. The last person you would ever want in charge of the world (which he more or less is).
Now, Schwartz was paid a lot for writing the book, back in the 1980s. Now he says he did it for money and fame, even though he didn't like Trump even back then.
So, I wonder, is Schwartz doing the same thing now but in reverse? Is someone paying him a ton of money to discredit Trump?
Or is Schwartz just being honest and trying to warn the world?
Now I know that everyone's opinion here will depend on if they are left or right, so there is no real point in my asking.
The writer of The Art of the Deal, Tony Schwartz, portrays Trump as a very unloveable person. Someone no one should ever trust. The last person you would ever want in charge of the world (which he more or less is).
Now, Schwartz was paid a lot for writing the book, back in the 1980s. Now he says he did it for money and fame, even though he didn't like Trump even back then.
So, I wonder, is Schwartz doing the same thing now but in reverse? Is someone paying him a ton of money to discredit Trump?
Or is Schwartz just being honest and trying to warn the world?
Now I know that everyone's opinion here will depend on if they are left or right, so there is no real point in my asking.
He has been president for a while now, with no major disasters.
Now I know that everyone's opinion here will depend on if they are left or right, so there is no real point in my asking.
Who are you crapping? Trump just emerged from a 35 day government shutdown disaster.
The writer of The Art of the Deal, Tony Schwartz, portrays Trump as a very unloveable person. Someone no one should ever trust. The last person you would ever want in charge of the world (which he more or less is).
Now, Schwartz was paid a lot for writing the book, back in the 1980s. Now he says he did it for money and fame, even though he didn't like Trump even back then.
So, I wonder, is Schwartz doing the same thing now but in reverse? Is someone paying him a ton of money to discredit Trump?
Or is Schwartz just being honest and trying to warn the world?
Now I know that everyone's opinion here will depend on if they are left or right, so there is no real point in my asking.
He has been president for a while now, with no major disasters.
Who are you crapping? Trump just emerged from a 35 day government shutdown disaster.
Trump has proven The Art of the Deal to be a work of fiction, to put it kindly.
Without the benefit of creative editing to make him come across as a smooth operator, he has revealed himself to be a complete screw-up at pretty much everything except rabble-rousing.
The writer of The Art of the Deal, Tony Schwartz, portrays Trump as a very unloveable person. Someone no one should ever trust. The last person you would ever want in charge of the world (which he more or less is).
Now, Schwartz was paid a lot for writing the book, back in the 1980s. Now he says he did it for money and fame, even though he didn't like Trump even back then.
So, I wonder, is Schwartz doing the same thing now but in reverse? Is someone paying him a ton of money to discredit Trump?
Or is Schwartz just being honest and trying to warn the world?
Now I know that everyone's opinion here will depend on if they are left or right, so there is no real point in my asking.
He has been president for a while now, with no major disasters. That could be dumb luck, I don't know.
We won't really be able to judge him unless something really bad happens, and we see how he deals with it. He might just keep on skating through the first term.
It does amaze me, a little, how Democrats find "evidence" that Trump has been a disaster as president, all real evidence showing he's been ok.
Your original post concluded with "So there is no real point in my asking."
It must be soooooo stimulating trying to have a real conversation with you. You probably ask and answer your own questions all the time, then stand there with your hands on hips, expecting nods of approval, and if none are forthcoming, it's because everyone else is wrong.
And you even call yourself Good4Nothing, but you seem desperate to have folks think you're good for something. I don't think you're very good at this "debate" thing because it is impossible to debate someone who thinks that they already know all the answers.
Forgot to take your tranquilizers today???:shock:
Who are you crapping? Trump just emerged from a 35 day government shutdown disaster.
Was I the one who started a thread by asking a question, then answering it, then concluding "there is no real point in my asking." ?
Was that me?
Uhhhhhh, no...it was
View attachment 67249512
When you start a thread that way, you're basically saying that you don't really care what the answers are.
Now, maybe that is just what you do on the internet because no one on the internet is a real person to you, and maybe you're nothing like that in real life.
But we are on the internet, yes?
So...you're "good for nothing" and we're not real to you anyway, am I right? Am I wrong?
Is anybody supposed to take a thread like that seriously?
I just want to know, that's all.
The writer of The Art of the Deal, Tony Schwartz, portrays Trump as a very unloveable person. Someone no one should ever trust. The last person you would ever want in charge of the world (which he more or less is).
Now, Schwartz was paid a lot for writing the book, back in the 1980s. Now he says he did it for money and fame, even though he didn't like Trump even back then.
So, I wonder, is Schwartz doing the same thing now but in reverse? Is someone paying him a ton of money to discredit Trump?
Or is Schwartz just being honest and trying to warn the world?
Now I know that everyone's opinion here will depend on if they are left or right, so there is no real point in my asking.
The reason I said that is because I am HOPING to see thoughtful answers, not just reflexive partisan answers. I was hoping to see THOUGHT not raw blind emotion.
I was hoping someone would prove me wrong in expecting knee jerking and mindless screaming. But you sure didn't.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?