• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

White Nationalists Love Donald Trump’s War on a ‘Mexican’ Judge

You don't even know what "racist" means. Learn and use it properly.

Let me guess. White nationalists are disgusting bigots but illegal scum waving their Mexican flags on the U.S. soil and burning ours are cool dudes. Right?

And that judge belonging to an offshoot of the racist La Raza is even cooler?



A racist is defined as “a person who believes that a particular race is superior to another.......
synonyms: racial bigot, racialist, xenophobe, chauvinist, supremacist

I think the use of the word was proper given the facts of how it was used.......and there is bipartisan support for that view point you might notice..........


You best not try guessing............you do not have the talent or skill to do so..........

And to use you logic........... If I were a judge and was a member of the Knights of Columbus I should recuse myself for any case before me where the parties were other than Catholic................Is that what you are saying

I think your logic is flawed........but more so UNAMERICAN
 
Bull****. The Republicans control the House AND the Senate, no Democrat President is going to be able to get everything they want, and our nation has gone through twelve years of the same party in the oval office.

Bull***. You are a one-party country already. The RINO's no longer even pretend to be an opposition party after the last two congressional elections.

And spare me grade school civics 101 how you have a "two-party system", which is nothing else than one socialist party divided into two factions needed to create an illusion of a fight. Just like during army war games.

To the naive, RINO's "control" Congress. Cool. And they gave everything to Obama what they told the faithful suckers in 2012 and 2014 they would fight against: ACA, amnesty, refugees, Planned Parenthood funding, and TTIP.

Can you name what the RINO's denied to Obama lately?
 
There's the enlightened left again, asserting that if the "white people could just die off", then harmony and utopia would abound. Good luck with that.


As a Republican white person I believe it sure would help the party a whole lot........... It is not a matter of luck.............it is just a matter of time and having patience...........:)

BTW

I am not liberal............I have been a registered Republican conservative for over 60 years...........
 
When was the last time that we had 12 consecutive years of Democrat presidents? FDR. Think Hillary is this generations FDR?

This election will be historic in many ways but the days of the GOP winning the Whitehouse are over for a long while if not forever. You might as well get used to it. The GOP aint what it used to be.
 
If Hillary pulls a high percentage of the vote than Dukakis did, it might very well be time to concede that the US is headed for disaster. I know that education standards aren't as high as they were in 1988, so it might happen.

The Real GOP election machine that engineered the state legislative take-over in 2010 is still the DEMs worst nightmare.

It's all about the state and federal remaps coming on the heels of the 2020 census election.

Blaming the educational standards for electing HRC is rich coming from a party that nominated trump .
 
As a Republican white person I believe it sure would help the party a whole lot........... It is not a matter of luck.............it is just a matter of time and having patience...........:)

Well, why not make that a part of your party's platform?

Vote Democrat. We hope white people die off

Should Hillary use this to lure in all the gullible soccer moms that support her?
 
It's not a conspiracy theory. It's a fact that if she wins, this country will never have a republican president. Ever.

You mean when Trump loses big he will bring the party down with him don't you? It really make little difference for the GOP who he is running against.
 
12 years of crooked Harding and the GOPs was quite enough before 20 years of FDR/Truman. While Bush-41 was/is a beloved figure, we all prayed for his health with Quayle as his VP.

Wondering how you feel about a challenge from Rand Paul to Gary Johnson in 2020 for the LP nomination ?

I'm definitely a Johnson supporter. I feel like Paul's been compromising on social issues to keep in good graces with the Republican establishment, and I doubt he's gonna jump ship after spending so much time in the party. And even if he did, the Libertarian party might not accept him with open arms.
 
Bull***. You are a one-party country already. The RINO's no longer even pretend to be an opposition party after the last two congressional elections.

And spare me grade school civics 101 how you have a "two-party system", which is nothing else than one socialist party divided into two factions needed to create an illusion of a fight. Just like during army war games.

To the naive, RINO's "control" Congress. Cool. And they gave everything to Obama what they told the faithful suckers in 2012 and 2014 they would fight against: ACA, amnesty, refugees, Planned Parenthood funding, and TTIP.

Can you name what the RINO's denied to Obama lately?

As one example to your last question, you must be MIA when it comes to the Garland fiasco.

Ask Speaker Ryan why he can't get a budget right now--he's got the same Freedumb Caucus problem that Boehner had, the one that caused the credit downgrade and shut down the government .
 
Bull***. You are a one-party country already. The RINO's no longer even pretend to be an opposition party after the last two congressional elections.

And spare me grade school civics 101 how you have a "two-party system", which is nothing else than one socialist party divided into two factions needed to create an illusion of a fight. Just like during army war games.

To the naive, RINO's "control" Congress. Cool. And they gave everything to Obama what they told the faithful suckers in 2012 and 2014 they would fight against: ACA, amnesty, refugees, Planned Parenthood funding, and TTIP.

Can you name what the RINO's denied to Obama lately?

How many gun control bills has Obama passed so far? Haven't you noticed that the military's budget hasn't been cut in any significant way? Has Obama even gotten around to closing Gitmo yet?
 
A racist is defined as “a person who believes that a particular race is superior to another.......
synonyms: racial bigot, racialist, xenophobe, chauvinist, supremacist

I think the use of the word was proper given the facts of how it was used.......and there is bipartisan support for that view point you might notice..........


You best not try guessing............you do not have the talent or skill to do so..........

And to use you logic........... If I were a judge and was a member of the Knights of Columbus I should recuse myself for any case before me where the parties were other than Catholic................Is that what you are saying

I think your logic is flawed........but more so UNAMERICAN

So what did Trump say about that judge that was "racist"?

Also, I noticed you evaluated my lack of talent to guess - an inconsequential throw-away word - but so skillfully ignored, White nationalists are disgusting bigots but illegal scum waving their Mexican flags on the U.S. soil and burning ours are cool dudes. Right?

Judges should not belong to racist organizations like La Raza, KKK, Black Panthers, or their affiliates. The fact that we have Democrat or Republican judges is a disgrace.
 
Well, why not make that a part of your party's platform?

Vote Democrat. We hope white people die off

Should Hillary use this to lure in all the gullible soccer moms that support her?


Silly post.............which requires no reply...........When you get serious..........Try again........:roll:
 
Silly post.............which requires no reply...........When you get serious..........Try again........:roll:

Who exactly do you hope to see die off? All white people? Just poor white people?

Which group dying off will give you the best chance of winning elections?
 
So what did Trump say about that judge that was "racist"?

Also, I noticed you evaluated my lack of talent to guess - an inconsequential throw-away word - but so skillfully ignored, White nationalists are disgusting bigots but illegal scum waving their Mexican flags on the U.S. soil and burning ours are cool dudes. Right?

Judges should not belong to racist organizations like La Raza, KKK, Black Panthers, or their affiliates. The fact that we have Democrat or Republican judges is a disgrace.


The leadership and almost all the GOP in Congress have said Trump's remarks were racist...........Don't you read the news reports.......I have been watching Faux and they have given little coverage to the GOP's outrage .........

And you have no talent in reading minds but your post is a great example of what racist remarks are like
 
Who exactly do you hope to see die off? All white people? Just poor white people?

Which group dying off will give you the best chance of winning elections?


Where did I say I hoped folks would die?

Do you have problems with reading comprehension?


And if I can give you a clue........the important issue being discussed was changing GOP policy to be attractive/meeting the needs of minority and people of color groups.......

Is this helpful for you?
 
I'm definitely a Johnson supporter. I feel like Paul's been compromising on social issues to keep in good graces with the Republican establishment, and I doubt he's gonna jump ship after spending so much time in the party. And even if he did, the Libertarian party might not accept him with open arms.

Stein and her Greens need to get behind GJ if he's to make the 15% threshold for debates. Watch trump fight that one.

Sen. Sasse is looking at GJ, but GJ needs money guys like Romney and especially Huntsman Sr. to get his message out, especially before the two conventions.

Paul will be a sitting Senator in 2020, much different than this go around. He'll tack back to his Libertarian roots, which is where I believe USSC Justices Roberts and Kennedy are. I think Garland would have joined them. Liberals weren't too thrilled with the Garland pick.

If HRC wins, she should ignore Reid on Garland and pick a liberal if DEMs win the Senate. Schumer can then pull McConnell's nuclear trigger on the USSC pick if McConnell filibusters. McConnell first threatened the nuclear trigger last decade when Daschle was filibustering Bush's picks below the USSC.

GOP ML Trent Lott did a similar thing to Clinton his last two years, just as McConnell has done to Obama. Pretty messed up system we're leaving to the next generation .
 
Where did I say I hoped folks would die?

Do you have problems with reading comprehension?


And if I can give you a clue........the important issue being discussed was changing GOP policy to be attractive/meeting the needs of minority and people of color groups.......

Is this helpful for you?

"But that will never happen until a sufficient number of poor uneducated white GOP men die off in sufficient numbers and can no longer hold sway over party policy........ "

What number is "sufficient" would you say?

How do you propose this is going to happen? The middle class is shrinking, which means less of a chance that poor whites will move up the ladder.
 
Where did I say I hoped folks would die?

Do you have problems with reading comprehension?


And if I can give you a clue........the important issue being discussed was changing GOP policy to be attractive/meeting the needs of minority and people of color groups.......

Is this helpful for you?

"But that will never happen until a sufficient number of poor uneducated white GOP men die off in sufficient numbers and can no longer hold sway over party policy........"

Sounds like you've given it some thought. I'm curious, what's a "sufficient" number in your estimation? How is such a thing going to occur?
 
"But that will never happen until a sufficient number of poor uneducated white GOP men die off in sufficient numbers and can no longer hold sway over party policy........ "

What number is "sufficient" would you say?

How do you propose this is going to happen? The middle class is shrinking, which means less of a chance that poor whites will move up the ladder.

Ya really think so?
 
Ya really think so?

It's no secret that many on the left think that they can have their warm and fuzzy liberal utopia when whites are removed from the equation.
Years of anti-white rhetoric in public schools and universities has fostered this ignorance.

I'm not saying that you believe in this, but usually people who throw around statements about a racial group "dying off" are closet supporters of racial genocide, regardless of that person's political slant.
 
It's no secret that many on the left think that they can have their warm and fuzzy liberal utopia when whites are removed from the equation.
Years of anti-white rhetoric in public schools and universities has fostered this ignorance.

I'm not saying that you believe in this, but usually people who throw around statements about a racial group "dying off" are closet supporters of racial genocide, regardless of that person's political slant.


But you believe this?



What I said is a matter of both fact and reality............To pave any possibility of changing GOP policy to attract minority voters is stymied by so-called conservatives which are mostly by the numbers older white men..........They sure do not seem to have any plans in leaving the Rep.Party............so the only way the numbers can be reduced is thru natural developments...........like death .......

But the current question now seems to be.......Will there still be a GOP? Many of the GOP think not..............Not only will Trump lose by a landslide...........he will be taking down the party too..........

This is no liberal made up BS...........These are serious concerns of professional leaders of the GOP and people familiar with US politics....

This is stuff you'll never hear or reported in the RW media.......

I am as a life long member am concerned..........Trump will take the p[arty down with him.........and then blame it all on someone else.
 
Back
Top Bottom