• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

White libs, race traitors & multiculturalists

Comrade Brian said:
And David Irving is an idiot. He thought the USSR was controlled by Jews.

And it was.Marxism as with most "isms" is the product of jewish minds and furthermore most of the instigators of the October Revolution and the people that subsequently gained power were atheistic jews:that is a matter of fact.
 
Aryan Imperium said:
And it was.Marxism as with most "isms" is the product of jewish minds and furthermore most of the instigators of the October Revolution and the people that subsequently gained power were atheistic jews:that is a matter of fact.

Doesn't being an Atheist negate your religion?
 
Gandhi>Bush said:
Doesn't being an Atheist negate your religion?

I never stated that I was an atheist.
 
Gandhi>Bush said:
Doesn't being an Atheist negate your religion?

Not if you're a Buddhist or Unitarian Universalist, and some others. But it does for Jewish.
 
Aryan Imperium said:
And it was.Marxism as with most "isms" is the product of jewish minds and furthermore most of the instigators of the October Revolution and the people that subsequently gained power were atheistic jews:that is a matter of fact.

That is a matter of lies.
 
Comrade Brian said:
That is a matter of lies.

It is quite amazing how jews out of all proportion to their numbers played a prominent part in the bolshevic revolution.The stirring up of strife and war appears to be a specialism.
 
You should learn how to spell 'Bolshevik'. Another reason your just another human.

And it wasn't started by Jews.
 
Last edited:
Comrade Brian said:
You should learn how to spell 'Bolshevik'. Another reason your just another human.

And it wasn't started by Jews.


http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v14/v14n1p-4_Weber.html


In the Communist seizure of power in Russia, the Jewish role was probably critical.

Two weeks prior to the Bolshevik "October Revolution" of 1917, Lenin convened a top secret meeting in St. Petersburg (Petrograd) at which the key leaders of the Bolshevik party's Central Committee made the fateful decision to seize power in a violent takeover. Of the twelve persons who took part in this decisive gathering, there were four Russians (including Lenin), one Georgian (Stalin), one Pole (Dzerzhinsky), and six Jews.

To direct the takeover, a seven-man "Political Bureau" was chosen. It consisted of two Russians (Lenin and Bubnov), one Georgian (Stalin), and four Jews (Trotsky, Sokolnikov, Zinoviev, and Kamenev). Meanwhile, the Petersburg (Petrograd) Soviet -- whose chairman was Trotsky -- established an 18-member "Military Revolutionary Committee" to actually carry out the seizure of power. It included eight (or nine) Russians, one Ukrainian, one Pole, one Caucasian, and six Jews. Finally, to supervise the organization of the uprising, the Bolshevik Central Committee established a five-man "Revolutionary Military Center" as the Party's operations command. It consisted of one Russian (Bubnov), one Georgian (Stalin), one Pole (Dzerzhinsky), and two Jews (Sverdlov and Uritsky).
 
People may have been Jews, but I doubt it was because specifically of their religion that started it.
 
Aryan Imperium said:
I never stated that I was an atheist.

I never said you were. I meant the statement about "atheistic Jews."

Out of curiosity, what is your religion, if you don't mind me asking?
 
Comrade Brian said:
People may have been Jews, but I doubt it was because specifically of their religion that started it.

Who mentioned "religion"?
 

The scholarly publication USA Today. The veritable pinnacle of scientific exactitude.

How 'bout something more definitive than the simplifications and implications of a journalist?
 
Furthermore, the article offered no definition of race.

What is the biological definition of race?
 
Comrade Brian said:
The Jewish religion maybe?

Few bolshevik jews are "religious".They are referred to as jews beacuse of their race.
Don`t try to convince me that the jews do not regard themsleves as a racial group.Racial jewishness is one of the prerequisites for israeli citizenship.
Indeed it is traced via the maternal line,nothing to do with religion.Judaism is merely the glue that holds them together as a people.
 
Gandhi>Bush said:
I never said you were. I meant the statement about "atheistic Jews."

Out of curiosity, what is your religion, if you don't mind me asking?

I am a Wotanist.
 
Aryan Imperium said:
I am a Wotanist.

So wait, you worship a pagan god of storm, frenzy, and battle lust? That begins to explain quite a bit.
 
jallman said:
So wait, you worship a pagan god of storm, frenzy, and battle lust? That begins to explain quite a bit.

And who do you whoreship?
 






Rob, ..there is much truth in your post. I do not hate people, or other races but because of liberals most whites are not permitted to even tell the g-damn truth anymore without being labeled as racist!

It is pathetic as to what has happened the last few decades; especially in regard to Television, & the cinema. As always the white man is portrayed as evil, a hater, an exploiter...just waiting to pounce upon others who are different.

This crap is also interjected into the public schools by these same fools who eulogize Jesse Jackson, H. Rap Brown, Louis Farakkan & Stokely Carmichael etc.

It is a feeble guilt complex that indicts the caucasion for every sin known to man, & it is also rife with phoney afro-centrist teaching as well, used as a sort of "affirmative" action to help make them feel better about themselves etc.

For them exposing the sins of the caucasion is a duty, ..but god forbid IF one ever attempts to address the problems of the black community, its PAST history of violence upon their own in the country of Africa, or its violent past & present behavior in America!

Many blacks will tell you that "seperate" but equal is illegal, & yet...they themselves enjoy, & actually engage in it themselves.

White liberals love convincing the american community that Blacks are ALWAYS victims of white america, & racism...& the blacks enjoy believing it, for it grants them "entitlement", both materially, morally & politically!

The liberals also love to justify black crime by tying it to socio/economic conditions, ..otherwise its a topic that is off limits, as WE must not ever discuss it, & those who do are then labeled racist!

When a people who comprise only 12-14% of the American population (actually the real number may never be known, I suspect it is probably closer to 20%)...are committing nearly 80% of ALL CRIME something is NOT right here, & it is NOT for lack of need as social programs have given them their daily needs for generations & generations.

I suppose American liberals in America are one of the few countries that loves to indict its majority for hate, bigotry, racism, & inhumanity while it continues to feed, house, clothe & educate the 'so called'; disinfranchised, & the exploited etc.

One would think the slave traders have arrived again, which actually were only a small minority who practiced the foul deed of slavery, ..which historically was NOT just confined to the african negroe, or America down through the millennia.

But then, ..whitey was never modernly compensated for the color of his skin, ..or for the sufferings of his ancestors, & whitey does not play the part of the victim by 'day', ..& then play the part of the justified criminal by 'night' either!

Your post will be looked upon as "racist", just as my words will be...because it cannot be refuted, & throwing out the racist label is much easier to explain than the white liberal who espouses affirmative action forever AFTER he is assaulted, robbed or humiliated in almost in any large inner-city!

Caring white liberals have done well to exacerbate race relations, ..as they have told blacks EXACTLY what they want to hear, & hasn't the 5-trillion dollars spent by the "great society" of LBJ brought an end to black poverty, & greater education opportunities?

Why no, ...they still claim they are poor, exploited & discriminated against all the way to the food stamp line, the free or subsidized housing line, the free medical card line,..& the right to be exempt from their own choices in life while appreciating the white man's guilt complex that pays dividends, & keeps them seperate but equal (entitled)...by their choice!

It is truly amazing that there are so many gripped by this guilt complex as well; even the white immigrants who never stepped foot on the shores of America long after slavery's end!

What the hell, might as well blame them, & their children for something, ..afteral they are white too!
 
Originally Posted by Stu Ghatze:
there is much truth in your post. I do not hate people, or other races but because of liberals most whites are not permitted to even tell the g-damn truth anymore without being labeled as racist!
Why don't you just shitcan this whole liberal rant of yours. Its garbage, total garbage. You are so FOS!
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…