What's the point of an off the record briefing to the media? They can't do anything overt with the information.....
A better question would be: WTF is an off-the-record briefing??
A better question would be: WTF is an off-the-record briefing??
A better question would be: WTF is an off-the-record briefing??
It's the start of one of their stories, you know, the ones that go "a senior White House source today would not confirm on the record but hinted that President Obama can, indeed, turn water into wine".
Anything that is discussed in the meeting can not be reported on it has to be kept from the public
Which begs to ask the question: why tell the media if they can't do anything with the information?
so to help the lap dog media spin it away so to help coordinate their stories to protect Obama and ClintonWhich begs to ask the question: why tell the media if they can't do anything with the information?
I wonder if Fox and ABC had a seat at the table.
Of course not. Fox isn't "mainstream" :roll:
Of course not. Fox isn't "mainstream" :roll:
The White House held an off-the-record briefing with reporters on Friday afternoon to discuss recent revelations about the Benghazi investigation, sources familiar with the meeting tell POLITICO.
The meeting began around 12:45 p.m. and postponed the daily, on-the-record White House press briefing to 1:45 p.m. White House press secretary Jay Carney did not respond to a request for confirmation of the meeting.
The off-the-record session was announced to reporters in the wake of an ABC News report showing that White House and State Dept. officials were involved in revising the now-discredited CIA talking points about the attack on Benghazi.
W.H. holds off-the-record Benghazi briefing - POLITICO.com
so why off the record? what was the purpose of the meeting ? is it so the media can coordinate the WH talking points with each other? is it so they can all perform the same spin to make this go away
Just more proof we have a state run media
Of course not. Fox isn't "mainstream" :roll:
Anything that is discussed in the meeting can not be reported on it has to be kept from the public
If by "mainstream" you mean carrying water for Obama on a daily basis, then right you are. But FNC is in the news line up of every other "MSM" source, MSNBC, CNN, ABC, CBS, NBC...
I think what you mean to say is that you don't like FNC because you like your news to ideologically agree with your point of view.
He accused the Republican party of leaking the emails that had been openly shared with congressional committees and the Republican leadership by the White House. "The Republicans have chosen to politicize this, to leak this information to reporters – information we provided months ago." But he added: "The whole effort here by Republicans to find some hidden mystery comes to nothing."
I think Fox is as mainstream as anyone else. Usually when people are bitching about the "lame stream" media, they leave Fox out of that.
So what I mean to say is that any realistic interpretation of the term "mainstream" includes Fox. But a lot of people like to forget that when talking about the "mainstream."
I would guess it's to give them marching orders. I mean it. I no longer trust the press. Frankly? I think Fox is doing a good job reporting. I don't watch or listen to their infotainment -- just read the news on their website. It's one of the few. I'm more apt to get good information on Drudge them I am from major network news.
We're in trouble, folks. We really are.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?