- Joined
- Oct 12, 2005
- Messages
- 281,619
- Reaction score
- 100,389
- Location
- Ohio
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Right
Not only are you demonizing liberalism, but you are claiming HOW liberals define their position on issues. Sorry. You are in NO position to do that. Everything I see above is nothing but an extreme version of an issue and an assumption that you cannot prove.
Hitler was more intelligent than Dick & Joe combined. Doesnt mean thet he was GOOD. And Im NOT saying Dick wasnt good or Joe wasnt good. Im saying intelligence with WISDOM is quite important.
I can define liberalism as I see it based on the positions the supposed liberals take on this board. If you support more government control over individuals' economic choices you have to claim that the government is in a better position to make those decisions than the individuals
I don't recall anyone claiming HItler was very bright.
I can define liberalism as I see it based on the positions the supposed liberals take on this board.
If you support more government control over individuals' economic choices you have to claim that the government is in a better position to make those decisions than the individuals
Basic gun control is absolutely necessary, and it'd be good if we could prevent guns above a certain caliber from being in public hands without special permits. For example, I'd rather not see my neighbor walking around with an M60, or something as powerful as that; a good idea would be requiring a special permit for guns that can penetrate body armor.
"If you support more government control over individuals' economic choices you have to claim that the government is in a better position to make those decisions than the individuals "
No, you don't have to make that claim. YOU may think so, but that is nothing but your opinion.
Ok, I'll play. If you support more government control over individuals' economic choices and it is not because you believe the government is in a better position to make those decisions, then what is the alternative reason to support the additional controls? Any other reasons I can think of are much more sinister...
To pay for services that assist in running the government and for needed services for society itself.
but can he spell potatoe?
I can define liberalism as I see it based on the positions the supposed liberals take on this board.
Or in a better position than the banks (which are coincidentally only there because of government).
Yes, you do have that freedom.
thanks to the effects of liberal political philosophy that has resulted in our acceptance of this basic assumption.
there are lots of banks-no one is killed or put in prision by a bank
and claiming that because some government is good more government is better is a specious argument
Dick Cheney evil genius
Joe Biden evil nickumpoop
I don't recall anyone claiming HItler was very bright.
I should quantify my answer. Intelligence is relative. I guess I could buy into into Cheney being more intellectually aware. I would also add that he is more ethically challenged. Additionally, he has less of an intellectual moral understanding of the plight of others.
Maybe they have something in common.10 Cheney, 1 Biden.
The sole Biden vote? Disneydude.
Seriously, was there ever a doubt?
snbl11225 said:I should quantify my answer. Intelligence is relative. I guess I could buy into into Cheney being more intellectually aware. I would also add that he is more ethically challenged. Additionally, he has less of an intellectual moral understanding of the plight of others.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?