Welcome!:2wave:Saboteur said:Okay I would like to clarify somethings. I'm realitivly new here and I've been debating on both issues. But I would like to know where you stand.
fair enough.Me: Pro-Choice, Anti-Death Penalty
I am pro-life, but feel the same way, do convenience abortion advocates deserve clean and safe, I don't think so, but the humane side of me doesn't want to see an American suffer through use of a back-alley abortion that got botched. I guess you could call me a choose-life Republican, I would rather people use other options.Why:
Abortion will happen even if it is illegal and I think women deserve to have it done in a clean, safe environment by a medical professional.
This is where we disagree, the problem is in the appeals process, if there is no doubt that the person committed a capitol offense, such as solid evidence, or very credible witnesses(let's say 5 or more) then appeals should be limited and quick. When there is doubt, extra time should be given to insure that we kill the right person.Putting a person in prison for life IMO is worse than a death sentence.
Here's how I differentiate; Innocent children didn't ask to be concieved, they have committed no crimes and hurt no one. Murderers, by their heinous acts have forfeited their rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. In fact, I think violent rape, child molestation, and child rape should be added as capitol offenses. We actually have two capitol offenses here in Louisiana, Murder(can't remember if it's one or two), and rape of a child under 12.
Saboteur said:Okay I would like to clarify somethings. I'm realitivly new here and I've been debating on both issues. But I would like to know where you stand.
Me: Pro-Choice, Anti-Death Penalty
Why:
Abortion will happen even if it is illegal and I think women deserve to have it done in a clean, safe environment by a medical professional.
Putting a person in prison for life IMO is worse than a death sentence.
That's why we have preventative measures that work 97-99.9% of the time...Don't want the baby, then protect yourself.hipsterdufus said:Safe - Legal and Rare - that's where I would like to see abortion. It would help if these abstinece only idiots would go away! There is no evidence that this form of education is working. Abortions have gone UP under Bush's presidency.
But, on the flip side it has proven beyond the shadow of a doubt that some did it. Meaning in my own opinion that we have an even smaller margin of error.hipsterdufus said:Ditto on my vote. I would also add the DNA evidence has proven that people have been unjustly put to death. There's no overturning that.
Convenience abortions disgust me, but the unsafe abortion alternatives are worse. I think the only cases I totally agree with are rape and the health of the mother, however, in my long-winded way I agree with you.Safe - Legal and Rare - that's where I would like to see abortion. It would help if these abstinece only idiots would go away! There is no evidence that this form of education is working. Abortions have gone UP under Bush's presidency.
mixedmedia said:I didn't vote, because my view on abortion is complicated. I believe abortion is ethically wrong. Birth control should be free and easy to obtain for all women and teen girls. I'm still on the fence with the "morning after pill" but it could possibly be very effective in reducing the abortion rate assuming it is free and easy to obtain. Perhaps then we could see the demand for abortions reduced to a manageable level, and then eventually stop the practice altogether.
But until such a time I see abortion as wrong but, with no practical alternatives, necessary.
I remember seeing a news release on the process of releasing new drugs into the American consumer market. The biggest obstacle seems to be the FDA itself, it requires ten years and billions of testing before a drugs release, the only way to deviate from said requirement is to get a release from the FDA, there was a drug, for example, that was meant for a particular type of cancer, the company wanted to test on terminal patients and couldn't get the release, I would think for those kinds of situations there should be some leniency, but this is what happens when a beuracracy gets too big.Saboteur said:Unfortunately, corporations are allowing pharmacists to refuse filling a perscription of the pill if they don't support it's use. I think that by not filling the perscription they're doing more harm than good.
Navy Pride said:It is hypocritical to be anti death penalty and pro choice.......
On the one hand you want to spare the lives of murderers and rapists who have committed violent crimes.
On the other hand you want to murder and innocent baby in the womb who has committed no crime.............
Plain old me said:This argument doesn't hold water with me...a lot of people base their view of abortion on the idea that what is in the womb is not an 'innocent baby', and therefore is not being murdered. Whilst the person sentenced to death is DEFINATELY a living human being - the foetus quite possibly isn't.
Navy Pride said:It is hypocritical to be anti death penalty and pro choice.......
On the one hand you want to spare the lives of murderers and rapists who have committed violent crimes.
On the other hand you want to murder and innocent baby in the womb who has committed no crime.............
Hornburger said:That's why we have preventative measures that work 97-99.9% of the time...Don't want the baby, then protect yourself.
Not really. A fetus never intentionally killed anyone.mixedmedia said:It is also hypocritical to be anti-abortion and pro-death penalty.
Navy Pride said:And a lot of people believe that if a scum bag kills and mutilates somone that the perpertrator should pay the ultimate penalty......
As far as whether its a life or not that is yours and the liberal viewpoint so you can sleep better at night........What if you are wrong? Have you ever considered that? Never mind I already know the answer.....:roll:
mixedmedia said:It is also hypocritical to be anti-abortion and pro-death penalty.
hipsterdufus said:How do you put the genie (abortion) back in the bottle?
When Roe v Wade is overturned it goes back to the states - people will go to states where abortion is legal.
If all that is overturned - the rich will leave the country for abortions and the poor will go to the back alleys.
As a man - I have a hard time interfearing with a woman's right to control her own body.
Sooner or later - science will get to the point where every fetus can be saved artificially. Then what?
Will the neo-cons fund that and the subsequent aftercare?
LaMidRighter said:I remember seeing a news release on the process of releasing new drugs into the American consumer market. The biggest obstacle seems to be the FDA itself, it requires ten years and billions of testing before a drugs release, the only way to deviate from said requirement is to get a release from the FDA, there was a drug, for example, that was meant for a particular type of cancer, the company wanted to test on terminal patients and couldn't get the release, I would think for those kinds of situations there should be some leniency, but this is what happens when a beuracracy gets too big.
I agree... too many cooks in the kitchen. But I think they did approve RU40 or a form of it but now the drug is meeting opposition from the people providing it for sale.
Navy Pride said:It is hypocritical to be anti death penalty and pro choice.......
On the one hand you want to spare the lives of murderers and rapists who have committed violent crimes.
On the other hand you want to murder and innocent baby in the womb who has committed no crime.............
LaMidRighter said:Not really. A fetus never intentionally killed anyone.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?