- Joined
- May 13, 2009
- Messages
- 20,630
- Reaction score
- 14,981
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
There is a difference between "embrace" and "expresses interest" in ideas from actually implementing those ideas.
You confuse the demorat's voluntary acceptance of some GOP ideas with republicants giving ZERO votes for PPACA as making them responsible for its content.
The country does NOT want Obamacare!
RealClearPolitics - Election Other - Public Approval of Health Care Law
They shouldn't have watered the bill down to appeal to Republicans then, who weren't going to vote for it anyway.
Exactly. They should have passed some kind of single payer version. Medicare for everybody who wants it, essentially. It would have been embraced by every thinking American, which of course doesn't include any Republicans.
Or, at the very least, the public option, the fate of which lies more in the hands of conservative Democrats (i.e. Nelson) than the GOP.
& that in a nutshell is liberal logic right there. We know what's good for you & what you want doesn't really matter because we are smarter than the "common man".
That is of course unless the people elect Dems to office.......then the people are brilliant & thoughtful & forward thinking! LOL, you guys really make me laugh.......& cry sometimes.
& that in a nutshell is liberal logic right there. We know what's good for you & what you want doesn't really matter because we are smarter than the "common man".
That is of course unless the people elect Dems to office.......then the people are brilliant & thoughtful & forward thinking! LOL, you guys really make me laugh.......& cry sometimes.
Wrong.
Obama embraces some GOP health care proposals - CNN.com
Obama expresses interest in four GOP healthcare ideas - Los Angeles Times
If this country did not want Obamacare, they would have voted for Romney.
Thats a ridiculous contradictory statement.
The Republicans had ZERO input or influence in the passing of Obamacare.
This is a Democrat creation and failure and Conservatives and Republicans tried you people.
If this country did not want Obamacare, they would have voted for Romney.
Then vote to repeal it. Meantime stop supporting an unconstitutional attempt to defund a law no the books.
But of course, you don't have the votes to repeal it. So much for your dishonest argument.
Exactly. They should have passed some kind of single payer version. Medicare for everybody who wants it, essentially. It would have been embraced by every thinking American, which of course doesn't include any Republicans.
Wow. It's amazing that politicians aren't advised of the secondary and tertiary effects of their actions. You would think that they would have a working group of leaders in the industry advise them on such things. I just don't understand how our elected officials, of both parties, aren't more educated on what they vote on. However, when gov't is as big and far reaching as ours is, it would almost be inhuman if they did know it all I guess.:shrug:Right now I'm just a second year Pharm.D. student (P2). I've worked as a pharmacy tech/pharmacist intern for 2 years and have had several rotations so far in pharmacy school ranging from regular community pharmacies to clinics, compounding pharmacies, and most recently a hospital. My preceptor was the pharmacy manager for the hospital and in the hospital all of their staff pharmacists are hybrid staff/clinical so I got to see both sides of the coin. In nearly every area I've worked and rotated through the practitioners from various disciplines (nursing, physicians, PA/NP, and pharmacists) do not have a favorable view of the law. Some of my professors do though and have shared why they think that way. I'm by no means an expert, but I have seen some diverse experiences so far and have talked with various healthcare providers and heard their views on it. I know the hospitals in my area are making big cuts and those in administration roles are not happy with the changes. As I said, it appears to be at least for hospitals a very upsetting thing to have no to minimal payment for readmissions and the hospitals essentially being graded under grounds of "customer satisfaction." If the hospital food isn't to a patient's liking they can rate them as lower and thus the hospital and healthcare staff will get less payment for their services by the insurance companies and government paying systems. If a patient has a heart attack, goes home and doesn't take their meds after discharge and comes back for angina or other problems they will blame this on the hospital and consider it a readmission that they won't be paid for but will have to be forced to provide care for.
How many Republicans voted for the final monstrosity ??
None. I wonder why.
If you're referring to the Republicans as the "honest people," you're unbelievably gullible.
He only "inherited " what the democrats constructed as far as a economy in free fall, and because of his incompetence has made things exponentially worse.
I'll ignore the rest of your steaming pile of a post and address this ...
1. Are you claiming that the economic collapse was all the fault of the Democrats? That's patently absurd.
2. Are you claiming that the economy is "exponentially worse" than it was the day Obama took office? That's just stupid.
Passing Obamacare was never about what the country wanted. it was about what they could snake through congress with a majority house, senate and WH and what they could use as a ploy to get reelected. Most that voted for it never bothered to read it.
The BEST thing the republicans could have done politically is FORCED compliance with the public AND corporate mandate and let people see for themselves just how much this is going to hurt jobs and the economy. What they are doing now will cost them probably the house and most likely the WH in 2016.
Nice framing of an evasive point ... let's put it this way, after a 5 year slog through a recovery that ain't happening, yes, the situation we're in is their fault.
Bullcrap. To insist that one party and one party only deserves 100% of the blame for the economic collapse is so utterly asinine as to defy all logic.
Congress critters care about two, very closely related, things: campaign cash and getting re-elected. In the 2012 elections 92% of our congress critters got re-elected even with congressional popularity ratings only slightly above roadkill - polls mean nothing, elections mean everything.